PC 81-64RCSOLUT(0;~1 P;O. Pi.~31-CI!
A RF.SOLUTIOtI OF THE ll'~~1H[IM CIT`( PLf•.~~1~11tJq C~~1~IISS1~!I
TYAT PETITIO!I FOR VA!',I:~,'IC~: ~10. 3201~ EF. G~/1!:TFD
WHERcI',S, the Ma'~eim City Planr:nq Canmission did receive a v~rified
Petition for Variancc from RICHA4D R, Hr LEr1nRr q,~p ~~Eyn E, HC 1_F'tO~E, 172~ ~iort`i
Holbroo!; Strcet, Anaheim, California 92'',^7, oo-mers of certain real pronerty situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California descrihed as:
Lot S of Tract 590!? as per map recorded in Boolc 23'~, Pages 37 and
3? of tqiscellaneous ~taps records in r.he office of the ^^cor•~ier of
said County. -
VHERE/1S, the City Planning Cor~nission did holci a pu'~lic hearinn at the Civic
Center ir tfie C;ty of Anaheim on Ma;~i~ ?3~ ~~~~~ ~t ~.~,~ ~~
hearing having b~en du1~ r' , n~tice of ;aid puhlic
/ ~ i vcn as requ i rcd hy 1a~ ~ and i r accor,ia„re +:; i tF the
provisions of U~e Anaheim Municipal Cod.~, Chapter 13,03~ ~.~ hear •,n,~ consider
evidence for a~d against said p-oposed variance and to invesl'i:,ate and m~t,_e findings
and recomrendations in connection therei~it'i; and
41f~EREAS, said Commission, af*_er due inspection, investtq~tion and study ~~~~,
by itself and in its behal`, and aftar due consideration of a11 evi•fencr and re.ports
off~red a"t said hearing, does find and det~rnine the follot•i;n~ facts:
1• That thr_ peti~ioner pr~poscs a~ratver o* ;h~
room addition: fnlin~~~ina te
cnnstruct a
SEC7l0~1 1~.2].(1~?,~2~ - Haximum lot eoveraqn,
(2C°
_~ .. ,. ~~....:~ ~__ ~~fO~IUSP~i)
Z. That the a~~ove-menticned a~ai~~er is ' erebv ~ranteo on the hasis that :he
petitioncr demon~trated that a hardship exists in t~at denial r,ould ~ieprive subject
property of a privilege enjoyFd hy ~th~r pro~erttes in °~~e samc zone a~d vicinity and
that the request is ninimal,
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conrlitinns
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that ,~o
.:,~t apply qeneraily to the property or class of use in the sane vicinity and zone.
i~• That the requested variance is necessary for the preservat(on and
enjoyment of a substantial property riqht possessed by other property in the same
vicinity and zone, ,~nd denied to the ?roper[y in question,
5. That the requested variance ~vill nor_ ~~ naterially ~letrimer,tal to the
public welfare or injurious to tfie property or im~r~vnr~ents in such vicinity and ~one
in ~~~hic'i thc property is located,
~• That no one indicat~d their nresenrc~ ~t ;~i~ n~F,~~~ hearing i~
opposition; ond tl~aC no correspcndence o-~as received in o~onsitlon tr the suhject
petition.
P~ ~ 1-!~'f
EtlVIR011MEtJTl1L 119PACT Flfl~lt;;: Thc Planning Dir~~ctor or hi, ~uthorized
representative iias determined that the ~ro~osed nrnj~ct `alls l~~ithin the definition
of Categorical Exr_m;~ti~ns, Class >, ~s defined in the State Ei~ ~uidelines and is,
therefore, c~tegor;cally exemnt from thc rnr~uirrment to prepare an Fif'.
NCW, TNEREFORE, FE IT RESOLVED that the ;~n;~heim City Planning Cormission
does hereby grant su5ject Fetition `o;- Variance, upon the foll~~•-inn con~iitions which
are herehy fnund to be a necessary nrerequisite to the pro~+osed use of the subject
property in order to ~res~rvc the saf~~ty and general ~:~elfare of the Cittzens of the
City of Anaheim:
1. That suh;ect property shall I~e develope~.l suhstartially in aceordanr.e
with plans and specifications on f~1~-~:.i[h the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit tlos. 1
and 2.
EF IT FUP,THER RESOL'![D that the Anatieim City Plannin~ Commission do~s herehy
find and deternine that ado~tion of this Resolu~ion is exnr~essly predicated upon
applicant's comn~iance ~~itn eac'i and a;1 nf the cnnditic~ns hereinahove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, ~,e ~i~~~~;ed invalid or unenforceable
hy the fina! judgment of any court of conpetent jurisdict~on, tnen this Resnlutlon,
and any apNrov~)s herein contain~d, shall i~e deemed null and void.
TfIE FOREGOING RE5f1~1ITI0i! is si9ned a~d a~prove~i hy me this ?3rd ~lay of
~~arch, 1:~II1.
ATTEST: ~
' ! ./) , i
l.....~~ e.~-~'..., .~ i.~.1~~
SECRET/1RY, APIANE IFi C I1'Y PLAFlG 1 WG COP1H I SS I Ot!
STP.T~ OF CALIfORFlIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtdAHElM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary nf the Anaf~eim City t'Ianning Comrission, do
hereby certi`y that the foregoir.g resolution ~~ras passerl and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plann~ng Commission held on 1larch 23, 1~~31, hy the fo11o~;~tnc~ vote of
the memher, thereof:
AYES: COM!~ISSIONERS: [~APIJES~ f3011AS, ~USH02E~ FRY~ f;l!1R, 7~LAR
NOES: CQMHISSI0NER5: P!Otl:
ABSE:~7T: COM111SSIONFRS: H[RE~S'f
IPl 4lITNESS IlhIEREOF, i %~~ve ',ereiint~ set ,roy h~in~l t~i ;?lrc! -1ny of ~1.3fCI1~
193t, -
~.
,' , .
' ~ ~ J
S~C.RETAR , Ap!l1~CITY PLANNIDIf; COMMISSIOPJ
; ~~~~; , (~.;'~~ ~ _ ~ ,
~ ~'% c
CNAIR'tA!, A~IAI'Ei~t CITY PLAN~IItJ~ CO"'HISSI~P!
-2- F'f. ~1-i,'~