PC 81-78RE~OL~JTIO~`J PIG. PC81-7P
A RESOLUT I OiJ OF THE ANAHE I t1 C I TY PLAPIP! I 6JG CQNM I SS I OM
THAT PETIT106! FOR RECLASSIFICA7I~M hln, 80-41-7_!i [~E Gn~NTED.
41HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissior. did receive a verifi~d
petition for Reclassification from MAURICF PINTO, P. 0. Box 3~21, Anaheim, California
g28~3, o~•!ner, and JERRY DRUY.ItJ, 128fi East Flower Strcet, Anaheim, California ~2805,
agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of Caiifornia, described as follows:
PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 27, Anaheim Extension as sho~,~r on a
map of survey made by lJiliiam Hamel in 1£358 and `iled in the
office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County, Califor~ta,
described as folica~s: Beginnina at a point in the center line of
Vermont Avenue, distant thereon 162.09 feet tiortheasterly from Its
intersection with t(ie center line of Palm Street; running thence
Northeasterly along said center line of Vermont Aver,~~, 300 feet;
thence Southeasterly parallel with the Easterly line of the parcel
of land described in Certtficate of Title Plo. 7725, in the office
of the Registrar of Land Titles of Orange County, California, and
thie extensions of said line, 257 feet; thence Sou~hwesterly
parallel with the center line of Vermont Avenue, 300 feet; thence
Northoiesterly parallel with the Easterly line c•i= the parcel of
land described i~i said Certificate of Tltle No. 77?_5, and the
extensions of said line, 257 feet to the point of beginninq.
WHEREAS, the City Piznning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Ar~aheim on February °, 1981, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly 9iven as required Ey iaw and in accordance with the
provisior.s of the Anaheim Municipal ~ode, Chapter 1£i.03, to hear and consider
evidence `or and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connectton therewith; said public hearing having been
continued to the Planninq Commission meetinq of April 20, 1qA1; and
WHEREFlS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itsel` and in its behalf, a~d after due consideracion of all evidence and r~ports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the petitioner propose> reclassification of subject property from
the RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Famiiyi Zone to the CL (Cortmerctal, Lir~ited) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject prdperty for lo~•~-
medium d.snstty residential and or general coi~imercial land uses.
3. That the proposed reclasslfication of subject pt'operty is necessary
and/or desirable for the orclerly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reciassificaticn of subject property does oroperly
relate to Che zones and their permittec~ uses locally estahlished in close pr~ximity
to subject property and to the zo~es and thefr permitted ^ses generally established
Lhroughout the community.
Pf.81-7$
1
im rovement oflabuttt~P Proposed reclassification of subjer,t pro ert r
P g streets in accordance with the Circulation Elenient of
General P1an, due to the anticipated ircrea;e in trafftc ~~~hlch ,, P Y e~utre; r~e
the intensification of land use, the
~i>> be generated by
E. That 4 persons indicaCecl «
oPposttion; and that a petition containir, ~heir presence at said
in oppoS~tion to the sub' `~ ~Proximately 2~ pUh~~c heartn9 ~n
Ject petition, ~~ s~9natures was received
EWVIROP~MFNTAL IMPqCT FIp!Dlp~r,; That the Anaheim City pla~ni~c~ Commtsslon has
reviewed the proposa to rec assi
Single-Family) Zone to the CL y S~h~ect property frnm the ag_
a residentlal structure with ~Commercial, Limited) Zone to 72~~ ~RPSidential,
landscaped setback o~ ~~aivers of max,imum structura)r~he~ch~mercial use of
approximately 0,4 acre a rectangula~ly-shape~ 9 and ~nlntmum
of Vermont Avenue, havinhaa~n9 a f~Ontage of a Parcelof land consisttng of
9 maximum d Pp~OX~mately 75 feet on the south side
approximately 24p feet east of ePth of approximatel 221
Avenue); and do tne centeriine of Y ~ feet and bein_q l~cated
es hereby approve the Ne Harbor Boulevard (406 West V
prepare an environmental -m a 9ative Declaration from the requirement~to
sig~ificant lndividual or cumulativeeadversenenvironmental imoact due to Li~
of thts Negat(vP Declaration since the Anaheim Genera~ p~a~t~desithere would
propert be no
Y for loo-~-medium e aPProval
commensurate with the r ~ensity residentia) o.- 9nates the sub'
in the P oposal; that no sensitive env9ronme~ta~~ mnacts,are i~volved
slgnificant~Pndavidualao~ ~he Initial S ~and uses
umulative adversesubmitted by tne petttioner indicates no
Negative De~)ardtion substant(a environmental im , and that
Anaheim Planning Department, t~ng the foregoing findin s ~s Pacts•
9 on file in the Cltytof
h10;/. THEREFORE, BE
does hereby grant subject Petition fo~ORecl~assafi~ae Anaheim Cjt p
18-Zonin9 of the Anah~~~ ,~. Y lannina Cnm~t~~',.-
r`cperty r"rom ~-~nicipal Code be amended ' ur~U, °y so dofn ~~"
descr~bed the RS-720p (RESIDEFITIAL, SINf;LE-FAPtILy) I~~~EXandde the abovehdescribed
cond(tlons wh(chrare hereb tfe ~~ ~COMMERCIA
~, LIMITF.D) Z~N~to tncorporate sald
of subject propert y°Und to be a necessar upon the fotloWt~9
~~tizens of the Cft Y~~ °rder to Y prerequisite to the
Y of Anaheim: prPServe the safety and proposed use
general welfare of the
~• That the ot•mer(s) of subject
a fee, in an amount as determined by the Cit C
along Vermont Avenue. ~rOP~rty sha11 pav to the Clty of Anaheim
Y ounctl, for tree pianting p~~PosPs
the City En That sidewa)ks shall be instalied along Vermont Avenue as r
the Offtce ofneer and 1n accordance wlth standard
the City Engineer, Pians and spectflcations onUfile bn
=tandards3• Tthe ~he exist~n
of 9 structure sha)1 be brouqht ~
Eiectrfcal, Mechanicaltd °f Anaheim, includtn P to t;~
nd Flre Codes as adopted9hYtthe ~i~t~AOf Aguilding, Plumbin~m
~~' Thet the oiJner(s) af naheim,
assessment fAe (Ordina~~e h,o, subject
fo~' commerclal ~~96 ~~Op~rtY shall pay the traffic
residence r~, b~~~dings p~~~r ~~~ ~" a~unt as determined h Sf9na1
commercfal use, t~ the issuance of a hUildjn y the
9 Permit toitY ~ouncil,
convert this
-2-
s PCB~-~~j
5. That the existing driveway shall be removed -and repl~csd witn a
standard curh, gutter and sidea,all-.
~. That appropriate ~•~ater assessment fees as de*ermined by the Office of
Uti]itles General Pianager shall be paid to the City of Anahei^~ ~rior to the issuance
of a building permit.
7. That completion o` these reclassification procee~iings is contingent
upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit ~lo. 2171,
8. That subject property shall be developed substartially )n accordance
with plans and specif(cations on file t~~ith the City of Ar.aheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1
through 4 (Revision No, 7).
9. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance wttF approved
plans on fi le ~•~ith the Office of the Executive Director of Publ ic b/orl;s.
~~. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Firv Department prior to commencement
of structural framtng.
11. That pr(or to the introduction of an orciinance rezoning subject
property, a reciprocal parking and access easement across the adiacent property,
located westerly of the south~~est corner of subject property, sha)1 be submitted to
the C(ty A~torney's Office for review and approval and then recorded H!?th the County
Recorder's Office. Satd easement shall also provid£ for access to Harbor Boulevard
from subject property.
12. Prior to the introduction of an ordinanc~ rezoniiig sub.ject property,
Condition No, 1, 7 and 11, above-menttoned, shall he completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the
Planntng Commission unless said conditi~ns are complled with within one year frorn the
date hereof, or such further time as the Pla~„~.. ~~T,~e,_•
~ . ~~cn riiay yrant.
~3. That Condltion PJos. 2, 3, 8, and 9, above-mentioned, shall be compll~d
with ~rior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commtsston does hereby
ftnd and determine that adoption of th(s Resolution is expressly pred(cated ~pon
applicant~s compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Shouid any such condition, or any part thereof, be deciared invaiid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of r_ompetent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nul) and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOPd is signed and aoproveci by me this 20th day of
April, 19$1,
ATTEST:
SECRETAR , Nqf{FIM CI Y LANhl~JG COMM15S10~!
___~~U~
CHA Rt•tAN, APlAHEI.M CIT PLANNING COM,~~SS10N
~3 PCEt-78
STATE OF CAL I FOP,N IA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Pianning Commission, do
herehy certify that the foregoing ;esol~~tion ti•Jas passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on Aprii 20, 19F1, by the following vote of
the mambers thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSNORE, FRY, KI~lG, TOLAR
NOES: COFiMIS510NERS: HEP,eST
AESENT: COMMISS IQIJERS: tJ(1NE
fN WITPdESS IdHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of April,
19$1.
-~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
SECftETAP,Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLA~lNIPIG COMMISSION
-4- PC81-78