PC 81-87aESC~!irinv rin. rc~3i-8
A RESOLUTIOh! OF 7H[ AIIFlIIE I'+ C ITY PLAtIN I td~ C01?I115S I OH
THA.T PETI710N FOR VARIAFICE 'ao. 3209 eE RRA"dTED, IPI PA?.T
LlHERFAS, the Anaheim City Plinning Conmission did receive a verified
Petition ror Variance from C~t~RAn J~ LFTTE~ A~ID JOSEPIiINF M, LFTTER, 31~? Vallejo
Drive, Flnaheim, Cal ifornia 92$~4, o~mer~, and IdALTE~ K. 6~~:1MA~1, 7~3~• Cerritos Avenue,
Stantcn, California °2714, anent, nf certain real pro~erty situaterf in the City of
A~iahelm, County of Oran9e, Statc of California descrihed as:
That portion of Lot of Lot 1 of the Anaheim extension as shorm on
a ma~ of Survey made by blilliam Hamei and filed for recordinq in
ttie office of the County Recorder of Los Angeles County,
Califnrnia, described as follo~•:s: Reginninn at a ooint in the
North li~e of said Lot heina in the South llne of La Palma Avenue,
distant thereon 255.33 feet L•lest of the FdorthFast c~rner of said
Lot runninq t5ence bl~st along the North line o` said Lot 79.91
feet, thence South parallel o-rith the Fa=terly line of saic~ Lot
3~2.23 fer_t thence PJorth 73 degrees 51.' 2S" East 77 Feet to a line
alhich is parallel ~iith the Easterly line of said Lot thru a ooint
of beninninq. Thence Hortherlv al~nn s~id Int nFntinnA~i nar~ll?1
line 27Q.~?4~ feet to th~ point of heginning. Said land is sh~vm
on a licensed Surveyors Hap filed in Book lI, Page ~ of Records of
Survey in the office of thc County Recorder oF said f,o~~nty.
4;HEREAS, the Cit~~ Plannin9 Comnission dtd hold a pubiic hearina at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on April Z0, 1~Si, at 1:3`1 p.m., n~tice o` said oublic
hearing fieving beFn duly given as required hy la~•i anci in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Hunicipal Code, Chapter 13,n3, to hear and consider
evidence for and anainst said proposed variance and to investioate an~! maF:e flndings
anu rrcorrirnaations in connection [h~r.r.with; and
4IHEREP.S, said Cormiission, after due inspection, investination and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due cnnsideration of all evldence and renorts
offered at said hearinn, does find and determine the Follo~•~in~ f~~ts:
1. That the petitioner pror~ses t•»ivers of the follo4~in~ •o construct a 1-
lot, E-unit condominium subdfvision:
(a) SECTIOhJ i3,31.~02.~12 - htaximum structural heiqht.
1-story permitted ~•fithin 15~ feet
ot~` single-family residential zcnina;
2-stories oronosed ai f,3 feet)
(b) SECTIOPd 1~3.31.'152.~12~ - Haximum site c~vera~e.
0,, permi tted; ~ E,7i pr~nose~i)
(c) SEf,T10!! 13,3i.(1!,3.~31 - Minimum recreat(onal-leisure area.
~ 10~0 square eet par ~nit required;
_29 squarc cct proposedi
PC3i-87
?_. That ti~e requestr~d ~•~aivers (a) .~n:l {t>) are herel•y granteri on the t~asis
that denial ~,nu1d deprive suhject proi.erty of ~rivil.^ges enjc~yed by other propertir_s
in the same zone and vicinity and t'iat a nenrlinn ~oninq co~e anonciment a+i11 elfminate
the need for ,aid ~•~aivers. ~
3. That the reque5teci ~~aiv~r (c) is herehy d~nied on the basis that
revised plans ~•rere suhmitted rleleLin~ t'~e neerl t'or ~;aid ~raiv~r.
4, That t'iere are excention~l or extr:~ordi~~arv circumstances nr conditlons
applicah~e to the pronerty involved or to Chr, intPnd~d ~ise, a5 qranted, of the
propertv that do not apply c~enerally to the prnr.crty or class of use in the same
vicinity anci zone.
S. That the requested variance, as qranted, is necessarv for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial nroperty right possessed by other
property in the same vicinir.y and zone, and d~nie~ to the nrooerty in question.
~. That the requested variance, as aranted, will n~t he materlally
detrimental [o [he puhllc welfare or injurious to tlie oronerty or improvements in
such vicinity and zone in i•,hich the pr~per*y is located.
7. That no one indicated their nrPSnnc~• at said public hear;ng In
opposition; and that no correspondencc~ ~~as rer.rived in oroosition *o the si.rbject
petition.
E~JVIROtlMEtJTAL INPACT FI~!DIP~G: T!~at t'ie Anahei~~ Cit~~ Pianning Com;~i~sion has
reviewed thP pr~posai to establfsh ~ 1-iot, ~-unit co~derainiun subdivisioi; with
waivers of max(mum structural height, maximui7 site covera~E and mininum recrea:ir,•~al-
leisure area on an irregularly-shaped p~~rcel of land cor,sist`ng of apnroximaCely 0,4]
acre, having a frentage of anproximately ~r1 feet on the south ;ide of La Palma Ave~ue
(12(,0 East La Palma Avenue); and does hero~,y aoprcve the tlegativ~ Derl.?rati~n frn~~
thc. rnm~ i ~~...~.....
~~ '~ r'~~~:-~: ~~~ Cuvironmer~af in;nact r~oort on C'ie hasis that there
would be no significant individual or cumuiative adverse envirn~mr_rt;al irr,pact due to
the approval of this Negative Declara*.ion sir.c~ the Anahein General Flan designa*_es
the subject property for mediurrdensity residential land uses commens~rate ~.oith the
proposal; that no sensitive environmental inract~~ are involved in the nroposal; Ch~[
the Initial Study suhmitCcd by the petitioner indtcate5 no sfanifi~ant individual or
c~mulaYive a:lverse environmental imnacts; and that the ~egative Declaratlon
substanLiating the foregoing findin~s is on file in the City of Anaheim Flanning
Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, EE IT RFSOLVFD thaY
~oes hereby grant, in part, suhject Peti*ion
conditior,s ~vhicl~ are herr_by found *_o be a neces
of the suhject proper!y in order t~ preserve the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
the A~ah~ein Citv Ptanninv Commission
`or ~/ariance, ~ioon the follov.~ing
sary prereauisite to the proposed u;e
safety anri .~eneral weifarP of the
~. That suhjeet property shali be developed suhstant;a)~y i~ aecr~rdar+ee
~.ith plans and sper_ifications on file ~ri;h ih~ Cit•~ or Annh~im marL~~l ~.evi:i~r, ii;~, 1
of Exhibit Nos, i thr~uah ?.
BE IT FURT~iER RESOLI'ED that th~ Aniheim ;:ity Plannl~~ Commission does hereby
find and deterr~tne that adoption of th~s Fesolution is exnressly prrdicateo itoon
-`- PC~31-fi j
apPlicant's cemniiance t•~ith each and all of the c~nc!itior~s hereinabove set `orth,
Should ~nv such condition, or any part thereof, h~ d~cla~e~l invalid or unenforceahle
by the final jiidyment ~f any c~urt ~f competent jurisdiction, thr_n this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, sha)1 he clc~~m~.~ null and void.
TNF. FORE~n~~~~ RE~OLi)TION is signed and aoproved by mA this ?Oth day of
APril, 1~~1.
c f,n~''„/~'`~a.~~~ ~G'-~'-~c_
ATTE3T: , ANAHEIII CITY PLP;dNlh~r. CQMMISSI~N
SECRETARY ~ ~ ~
, ANAHEIt CITY PLANr,IWG COMMISSI~N
STATE OF CALIFO?NIA )
COUNTY OF QqqiJGF ) ys,
CITY OF ANqHElt1 )
~+ Edith L. Harris, Sec-etary of the Anaheim Citv Piannfno C~r~r+ission, do
hereby ~P~t~py that the foregoin~ resolution ti•ias passed and ado~t~d at a^~eting of
the Anahelm City Pl~nnj~Q ~~~~,s;~n heid on April 7n, 1~R1, hv tf;P f, ~~~yinq vote of
the members thereof:
AYES; CnM'~ISSlONEt?S: COU~S, EUSHURE, FRY, HERRST, ~~~ir,~ Tn~f~o
NOES: C0~1M15S 10!:ERS: tlO~lc
A95EPJT: C~!~HISSIO~;EFS: BAR~lES
IFI WIThJESS 4JHEREOF, I have hereunto set mv nanri thts 2nth a~y ~,f April
1^81.
`~~ ~° ~~~.
SECR.TARY, AM,4HEIFt CITY P(~p~~NIN~ CO~~P~ISSION
-3-
PCF31-$?