PC 81-91_ ~
...,
RESOLUTIOPI N0. PC~i-~1
RFSOLUTIOt! OF TS;E r^,';AF!EI!1 f~TY PLA~JhIIM~ CON'11SSION
THAI' PETITIO~! :=OR VARIA~lCE N0. 321(1 BE G2~NTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petitio~, fnr Variance from Of?A'1GF COU"ITY PU3LIC RELATIONS, ItIC., i?~ Fiarhor Ridge
Drive, ~lewport Beach, California ~26h~, o~vner, and bIILLIA.'< J, McGEE, 1_('R2 Southeast
Bristol Street, l~2Zl, Santa F,na, Califnrnia 92702, aaen[~ of certain real nro erty
sttuated in the City of Anahcin, County o` Oranqe, State of California described as:
The northeast quarter o~ the northeast quarter of the northeast
quarter of Section 24, Toom;hip 1~ South, Range 11 ldest, in the
C i ty c~f Anahe im, CoiinEy of Orange, S ta te of Ca 1 t fonr ta , i n the
Rancho Los Coyotes~ as per ma~ recerded in hoc~L 51 page il nf
Niscellaneous '4aps, in the officr~ o~` the county recorder of sald
county, EXCEPT the 'dest 132,np feet thereof, ALSO EXCEPT the
South 328.~0 f~et thereof, A~SO EXCEPT t'ie East 2F~2,3~ feet
thereof, Saici land is included ~~~ithin the area s',o~m nn a man
filed 1n boo4: ?5 paq~ 4 ~f Zecor~i of Surveys, in Che office of the
county recorder o` said county.
bIHEREAS, the City Plannina Conmission did hold a ni!hlic hearinp at thn Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on April 20, 1^81, at 1:3n p,m „ notice of said nublic
hearing having heen duly qiven as required !~y la~•~ and in accordance ~•rith the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipat Code, Chapter 18.~3, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investi9at,^ anrt make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
4/NEP,EAS, said Commission, after due inspectic,n~ investiaatinn and study made
by itself e3nd in its behalf, ~~,t -~f...~ .~,,, _
orrered at said hearing, does find and deterni,neuthe~foiloo-iin~lfactser.ce and reports
~. That tl~e petitioner ~roposes a~~aiver of the `ollo~-~ina to estabiish a
23••lot, 22-unit condominium subdivision:
SECTIOM iR,01,130 - Cequlred lot fronta~e.
rontage on pub ic street or al)ey required;
22 lots wfthout rontaqe nronosed
2. Tha~ the above requested waiver is hereby gr~nted on the hasis denial
requested waiver is herehy granted on the hasts denial ~~ould deprive subject property
of a privilege being enjoyed hy other properties in the same zone and vlcinity and
that mutual access ~oil) be avai~ahle across the property to the puhlic street.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circur~stances er condittons
appiir.abie to L'he property involved or to tFe intended use of th~ property that do
not apply generally to the property or class of use in the sarne ~icir.ity and zone,
1F. That the re~uested variana is nrc~ssar~• for the preservation and
~^Joy~ent of a substanfial property right possessed by ather nr~nerty in the same
vicinity and zone, and denied to the property ~n questicn,
PC81-~1
5, That Y.i~c re~u~~st~~d v~riance ~•ii 11 n~t be materiil ly cietrimental to *_hP
puhlie ~•.elfare or injurious to the pronerty ~r imnrnvemenrs in such vicinity an~i zone
in ~lhich thz property is l~cateu.
6. That no one indicated their ~I'CS?f1Cr at said pu!?lic hearinn in
opposition; and that no corresponcfenc~~:~at receivnd in opnosition to the subJect
petition.
EtIVIROtlME."ITAL IHP/lCT FIMDI~if,: F. !~egativ~ Declaration >>as previously
approved by the Planning Comnission on DecemF~er 1, 1~~~, i~ c~njunction with
Reelassificatiion Nu. P~-~1-1~, Variancr_ Mo. 31?' and Tentative Tract ~~o. 113.'n,
N~IbI~ THEREFORc, BE IT RF.SCLVED that 'he Anaheim City Plarnin~ Commission
does hereby grant sub;ect °etition for Uariance, upon the fnllu4~inq conditions ~.~hich
are hereby found to be a nec~ssary prerequisite t~ the prop~sed USP. of the subject
property i~ order to preserve the safcty and general wc~lfare of the Citizens of the
City of Anahein:
1. That suhject property shali be develo~ed substintially in accordance
with plans ard specifications on file ~~itn the Citv nF An~S~in TarF:ed Exhihit 'Jos. 1
throuah :i.
BE IT fURTHER RESOL~iFb that: t'ie Anahcim Cit~~ Piannin~ Cemnission does herehy
find ~nd de~ermine that ado~tion of this Resolution is ex.nressly nrwdic.ated upon
applicant's compliznce o~ith each and all of the conditions hereinahove set forth,
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, he drelar~d invalid or unenforceable
by thc `inal judgment of any court ~` crncpetent jurisdictinn, then this Resolution,
and any approvals hercin cnntained, s!i~ll he deen~d null and void.
THE FOREGQ1~7r, RFSO~.~fTl(lt' is signed ,~nd a~nrove~l hy me thic ?:lth day of
Anril, ~nn~,
e~/~ ~c~
CIIAIP,r+~t1, A.~V1h!Elti C TY PL~"lP7ltlr, r,n~~HI5510~1
ATTFS7:
~~..~. ,~ 1~.~
SECRETARY, A~dAHE IM C ITY PLAtI~J f t1G COMMISS IOt!
-?- °C£~1-~1
ST~TE OF ;.~L i FOP,!! I!~ )
COUNTY OF ORAPIr,~ ) ss.
CITY OF AHl1HEIN )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secrerary ~f t~~,e Anahrin City P;~nnin~ Ca~nission, do
hereb•% certify that the foreqoinc~ resoiution ria5 passrd and ~d~pt~d ~t a meeting of
the F.naheim City Plannine, Commission held cn April ?~, 1~~11, hy [he followin9 vote of
the nembers thereof:
AYES: COHMIS510?lERS: BARNES, EO!IAS, B!~SHORE, FRY, HFRPST, f;l~1r,, 7~LA°.
NOES: CQMHISSIONERS: BUSN~2E
ADSE~~T: CrMr~IS510tlER5: BARNES
IN IJITtJFSS blNEREOF, I have hereunto set ny f~anci this 2~th day of April,
1~81.
~~ ~ ~~
SEC"ETARY, Ar~qHEIN CITY PL11~!*lIMG C~~IMISSIOPI
-3- PCt31-91
~
~
~
o:
c
rr
O
~
Z
O
N
~
C'7
~
W
N
i -~!
•!:~
,°`