PC 82-120RESOLJTIOh! N0. PCf32-120
A RESOLUTI ON OF T4E AhIAfIE I M C I TY PLAiJId I ~JG COMM I SS I OP!
THAT PETITIOD! FOR COPIDITIO~~AL USE PERt11T P10. 2346 (3E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Analieim City Planning Cummission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from GEtlERAI, AMERIf,A~~ LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY, 1630 South Sunkist Street, "B", Anahetm, California 92806, owner~ and
LESLIE LEIS, 150Q South Sunkist Street, "F", Anaheim, California 32806 , agent,
of all that certain land situated in the Ctty of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, described as:
PARCEL 21 OF A PARCEL M/1P RECORDED IN DOOK 1G2, PAG[S 27 TO 31,
BOTfI INCLUSI`.'E, OF PARCEL 11APS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CAL I FORP! I A.
WFiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pubiic fiearing at the City
Hail in tlie City of Anaheim on June i4~ t9IIz, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHERE{1S, said Commission, after due inspection, invr_stigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follovring facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18,61.050.39~ to wit to permit
on-sale beer and wine in an existing sandwich shop in the t1L (Industrial, Limited)
Zone.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and development of tne area in which it is proposed to be iocated.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the fult development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health. safety, and general welfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace. health, safety and general
welfare of "•.e Cltizens of the City of Anaheim.
S. That the traffic generated by the prorosed use ~aill not impose ~n undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
6. That ~~o one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
PC82-120
~, .- .
EPlVIROt•JIIENTAL IMPACT FINDI~•!G: The Planninn Dirr_ctor or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed proJect falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prep~re an EIR.
N04l, TNEREFORE, E3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the C~ty of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall b? developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
No,1 and 2.
I3E IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Cemmission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition. or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained~ shall be deemed null and void.
t982.
THE FORE601~JG RESOLUTIOPI is signed and approved by me this 14th day of June,
~'5.~.~-~- ~ ~~.~
CI1AIRhiA~d~ AtdAHE!M CITY PLANPlIPaG COMMISSIOP!
ATTEST:
~[ a~~ i~B.~.~..a.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAtJNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CRLtFGRIdiH )
COUNTY OF ORAiJGE ) ss.
C ITY OF AtJAHE IM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of t`~e Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passad and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 14, 1982, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES~ BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOPJE
AaSENT: COFIMI~SIONERS: NONE
IN WITtJESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of June, 1982.
l~ ~,c_.GL, ~C . ,~V~.,~_
SECRETARY, A~lANEIM C1TY PLANPIING COMMISSION
-2- Pc32-120