PC 82-165^'~ ,:,~..,.
RESOLUTION NO. PC82-165
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIUN
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2370 BE GRANTED
WIiEREAS, the Rnaheim City Planning Commission did rer.eive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Pe±-mit from OMER J. AND CONSTANCE J. GIBSON, 215
South State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805, owners and PHILLIP
A. ZYWICIEL, 300 South Harbor Boulevard, Suite 802, Anaheim, California 92805,
agent of certain real property situated in the City o£ Anaheim, County of
Oranye, State of c:ali~ornia, described as:
LOT 5 OF TRACT NO. 1758~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ IN THE
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED
IN BOOK 53, PAGE 19 aND 20 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 8, 1982 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as r~Zuired by law and in
accordance with the provisiona of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recoaunendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does £ind and determir.e the
follow±ng facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to
wit to pe::'mit an office use in a residential structure:
2• That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
iand uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
3. That the size and shape of r.h~ site proposed _°or the use is
adeguate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anahei.m.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
~pposition; a-3 that no correspondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
#0196I PC82-165
r-.
,~~~.
~x;~ ~IRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim
;y,; Commission has reviewed the ro osal to ermit and office use City Planning
` structure on a rectangularl P P P in a residential
~'!~' y-shaped parcel of land consistin of a
~'~ 0.14 acre, having a frontage of approximately 64 feet on the s uth side e~f
; Ball Road, and further described as 324 West Ball
apprave the Negative Declaration from the Road; and does hereby
prepare an
-„•~ environmental impact report on the basis t:hat thereulwouldtbeto
:.i individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to n~ significant
~ this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan the approval of
~~; subject property for commercial professional office uses ~ommensurates wgth
t; the propoaal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the
„ proposal; that the Initial Study submitted b
"~ significant individual or Y the petitioner indicates no
~' cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that
~~ the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in
~f the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
C~
NO{9, THEREFORE, BE ST RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Cammission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the followinq conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1• That the owner(s) of su!~ject property shall deed to the City of
1lnaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the centerline of the
street along Ball Road for street widening purposes.
2• That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for
street lighting along Ball Road.
3• That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Counci2, for
tree planting pqspOSe~ aloriy Bail Road.
4. That the vehicular access rights, except at approved acceas points,
to Ball Road ~hall be dedicated to the City of Fnaheim.
5• That the existing structure shall be brought up to the minimum
standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building,
Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the
City of Anaheim.
6. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordina~ice No. 3896), in an amount as determined by
the City Council, for comatercial buildings prior to the issuance of a
building perutit.
7. That trash i:torage areas shall be provided in accordance with
aPproved p1anN on file w.ith the Officc of the Executive Director of
Public Works.
e. That this Condition Use Permit is grantad subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 67-68-33, now pending.
9. That subject property shall be developed substantialYy in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit rro. I.
-2-
PC82-165
a.M
10. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 an9 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resoli;tion, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued,
or within a period of one year from date !~ereof, whichever occurs
first, or such further time as the Planning Commission may qrant.
11. lhat Condition Nos. 5, 7 and 9, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to fina7. building and zoning inspecti.ons.
12. That medical offices will not be established on subject property as
stipulated to by the petitioaer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of tY,is Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's conpliance with each and all cf the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final iudqment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any aop=ovals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOir~ RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 8th day of
September, 1982.
~
A N, ANAIiEIM CITY p NG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
_ //~ 1 .L - KYFJit.vd
SECRETARY, }~NAFiEIM CITY PLANNING C~MMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September
8, 1982, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS; BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, MC SURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of
September, 1982.
~~ .~° ~/~,t~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CZTY PLA~ NNING COMMISSION
_ f ,:'
_ -3- PC8'1-165 _'~