Loading...
PC 82-180~~. /~\ RESOLUTION NO. PC82-180 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COiNMISS20N THAT PETITION FOR CONDZTIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2376 BE GRANT~D WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ANAHEIM SCHOOL DISTRICT OF ORANGE COUNTY, 412 East Broadway, Anaheim, Cdl.ifornia 92805, owner of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PAR('EL 1. LOT 7 OF THE KELLOGG HOMESTEAD TRA~T, AS SHOWN ON A MAP i2ECORDED IN BOOK 8, PAGE 51 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEItEAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at tite City Hall in the City of Anaheim on September 20, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., n~~tice of said public hearing having been dulp given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine •the following fact~:: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.21.050.270 to wit:to permit a private college in an existing school facility with waiver of the following: SECTION 18.Q6.G60.0261 - Minimum number of parking spaces (188 spaces required for a technological college; 137 spaces provided) 2. That the proposed use is hereby limited to a maximum enrollment of one-hundred-fifty (150) st~udents at any one session. 3. That the requested waiver is hereby granted on the ba3is that the use shall be limited to a maximum enrollment cf 150 students, and on the basis that there is property on the northerly portion of the site which ca.n be developed for additional par;c?ng spaces, if necessary. 4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses :.nd the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. #0~292 PC82-180 /^ 5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for t,he use is adequate to allow the full development of the pruposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and genera]. welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 7. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and 'nighways designed and improved to carry +-he traffic in the area. 8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commi.ssion has reviewed the proposal to permit a private college in an existing school facility wit~: weiver of mini*~um number of parking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 7.8 acres, having a frontage of approximately 446 feet on the south side of Ball Road, and further described as 2000 West Ball Road; and does her.eby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property Eor elementary school site land uses commensurates with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negati~~e Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grar_t subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance w:.th approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works. 2• That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for street liqhting along Hall Road. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal assessmPnt fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determined by the City Council, for commercial buildings prior to the issuance of a building permit. '2' PC82-180 ,-~ ~ 4. That the easteriy driveway shall be removed and replaced with a standar~' curb, gutter and sidewaik in accordance with the recommendation of the City Traffic Engineer. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in acrordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3. 6. That Condition No. 2, above-mentioned, shaJ.l be complied with prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 4 and 5, above-~entioned, shaJ.l be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 8. That the use shall be limited to a maximum of one-hundred-fifty (150) stuclents at any one session. If the number of students exceeds 150, a new use permit shall be filed. H~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereb~. find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 20th day of September, 1982. ATTEST: 0 1/J ~ • ` /~A~A SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tl~e Anaheim City Planning Cosm'~~~:~on, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adoF ^:~ at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held cn September 20, 1y82, by the following vate of the m~mbers thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERSST, KING, LA CLAIRE MC BURNEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONEFS: NONE , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto e~t my hand this 20th day of September, 1982, - ~N~~~~.~ ~~ G`K-~~~~~ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PL7INNING COMMISSION -3- PC82-180 N, ANAHEIM CITY ING COMMISSION ',~;~;.