Loading...
PC 82-194'~ ~ RESOLUTION NO. PC82-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2384 BE GF2ANTF.D WHEREAS, the Anahei.m City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ROGER LEE & ICATHLEEN P. NELSON, P. O. Box 6082, Anaheim, California 92806, owners, and JOSEPH FARGO, 2820 East Miral.oma Avenue, Anaheim, Cali£ornia 92806, agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anahei.m, County of Orange, State of California, described as: LOT 9 OF THE EUCALYPTUS POREST TRACT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 5, PAGES 29 AND 30 OF MISCELLANEOUS :2ECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall ,in the City of Anaheim on October 18, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice o£ said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence £or and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommPndations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation arid study made by itself and in its benalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.503 to wit: to retain a truck and trailer storage yard in the bII, (Industrial, Limited) Zone. 2. That the proposed use is hereby granted for a period of two (2) years, to expire on October 18, 1984. 3. That the proposed use will not advarsely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the traffic generated by the propased use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. #0284I PC82-194 ~", ~ '=~i"~."' 7• That no one indicated tlieir presence at said public hearing in y'i.r: : ; f~!~ ~~.:~. . :~tx,:, opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition. .:,`:. C.~; < ~ ~", . ~~''~" ENVIRONMENTAL I~ypACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Plenning _ Commission has reviewed the prooosal to retain a truck and trailer storage ~ yard in the ML (Industrial, Limited) Zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of :"'~°:'~,~,' land consisting of approximately 0.86 acre, having a frontage of approximately <'c,'". ; , 'i'"' 132 feet on the south side of Miraloma Avenue, and further described as 2830 ;;~" East Miraloma Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from ~ri:.'. the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that t'F;; ~ there would be no si gnificant individual or cumulative adverse Pnvironmental :$.;; impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general industrial land uses ;;.-V; commensurates with the proposal; that no sensitive environmen*_al impacts are ,,. involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner ;:;,i 5`-~:~ indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental r;: impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing bYi;`~,' findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. .~~,:-".' i NOS9, THEREFORE, BE Ii RESOLVBD that the Anaheim City Planning ;??,~~ Commission does hereby qrant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon i<~'< j ' the following conditions which are hereb,y found to be a necessary prerequisite ~"; to the proposed use cf the subject property in order to preserve the safety o,;u j `'M~ and qeneral welfere of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: ~ ~. ,~''.;~ That sidewalks shall be installed along M~raloma Avenue as required k' by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and ~'r', specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer. ~,`-. ~'; Z• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with ~-, jti'' approved plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works. ~ 3. That appropriate water a ~ ssessment fPAs as determined by the Office ~: of Utilities General Manager shall be paid to the City of Anaheim. •~.S': 4• That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the tra£fic signal '" assessr~ent fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determined by ,I ` City Council for open land uses (15,180 square feet). ,ey~ 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance r<I with plans and specificatio~ia on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit No. 1. ~• That Condition Nos. 1 through 5, above-mentioned, shall be completed within a period of sixty (60) days from the date herein. , 7• That the proposed use is hereby qranted for a period of two (2) years, i:o expire on October 18, 1984. -2 PC82-194 ~ ~''~°, + does herebBE IT FURTH~R RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plarining Commission i y find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly ;~; predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. S:,ould any such condi.tions, or any part thereof, be ~ declared invalid or unenforaeable by the final ud competent jurisdiction, tlien this 7 9ment vf any court of i ~ containeC, shall be deemed null and volaesolution, and any approvals herein ? THE FOREGOING REgOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 18th day ~ of October, 1982. HA2 , ANAHEIM CITY ING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~~~~ ,1° ~~,~, ' SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIJN ST11TE OF CALIFpgD7=A ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF AfI}~fiEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meetinq of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 18, 1982, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOUA~, BUSFIORE, FRY, HERBST, KING~ LA CLAIRE NOES: CUN',MISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MC BURNEY IN WITNESS WHEREpF, I have hereunto set my hand this 18th day of October, 1982. SECRETARY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ''' . ANAHEIM CITY PLAND7=NG COMMISSION -3- PC82-194