PC 82-203, '~`\ /"'•.
R~SOLVPION NO. PC82-203
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITZON FOR VARIANCE NO. 3302 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Variance from MICHAEL GULAND, 20221 Prairie Street, Chatsworth ,
CAlifornia 91311, owner and WILLIAM RAFF, 20221 Prairie Street, Chatsworth,
California 91311, agent of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as:
PARCEL 1, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE
1 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFZCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on November 1, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearinq having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anah~im Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to
investigate and make findings and reconunendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
st+i3y made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner p.ropose a waiver of the following to expand
a self-storage facility:
SECTION 18.06.060.038 - Minimum number of parking spaces
and 18.61.066.050 (69 spaces required; 12 proposed)
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis
that the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that the nature of
the proposed use consisting of a self-storage facility with individual rental
storage units does not require the number of parking spaces required by code
for regular warehouses and that denial would deprive subject property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same zone and vicinity.
3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
propezty that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question.
5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
6. Tha`. no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corresponc?ence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
#0307I PC82-203
~G.::i~d;;:~.:, .._r: ..,,~aietl~
~""., ~:..
ENVIRONMENTAL ZMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand a self-storage facility with
wai•ver of minimum number of parking spaces on an irregularly-shaped parcel of
land consistinq of approximately 2.8 acres, approximately 600 feet south of
the centerline of La Palma Avenue an3 further described as 1050 North Armando
Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration from the requirement
to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the
approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan
designates the subject property Eor general indus}rial land uses cowr.ensurate
with the proposal; that that Initial Study submitted by the petitioner
indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse e~:vironmental
impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL~D that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessarl prerequisite to the
proposed use of the s:ibject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
I. i'~iat the owner of subject property shall execute and record an
agreement in a form approved by the City Attorney, agreeing to pay
the cost of installation of all street improvements on that portion
of La Mesa Avenue heretofore dedicated to the City of Anaheim for
public street purposes. Said agreement shall be binding upon any
succession in interest to said property and provide that such cost
shall constitute a lien on the subject property until paid.
2. That proposed Huilding "F" shall be sprinklered unl.ess othe.rwise
approved by the Chief of the Fir.e Department>
3. That a twenty (20) foot wide water easement shall be dedicated to the
City of Anaheim as required by the Public Utilities General Manager.
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plan:. and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 1.
5. That Condition No(s). 1 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with prior to the coinmencement of the activity authorized under this
res~lution, or prior to the time that the building permit is issued,
or within a period of one year from date hereof, whichever occurs
first, o~ such Eurther time as the Planning Commission may grant.
6. That Condition Nos. 2 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be complied c•~ith
prior to final buil3ing and zoning inspections.
-2- PC82-203
"'\
Fri`,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or ~iner.forceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lst day of
November, 1982.
~
N, I,d EIM C Y LANNZNG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~a~r~ ,~ /~~~,c.~w
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 1, 1982, by
the following vote of the members there of:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, KING, LA CLAIRE,
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~1BSENT: COMMSSS20:1~RS: ii~RgST, MC BURNEY
I2I WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this lst day oi November,
1982.
~~~-~ ~ ~.,,, _, •
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3~ PC82-303