PC 82-213.~..,
RESOLUTION NO. YC82-213
,~..;,.
A RESOLUTION Or THE ANAHEIM CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIUN NO. 82-83-11 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 76 South
Claudina Street, Anaheim, Califorr_ia, 92805, owner, and ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE, P. O. Box 6268, Anaheim, California 92805, ATTN: OBIE MOOR~, SUNSET
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, agent, of certain real praperty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OE ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING PORTIONS OF
LOTS 1 THROUGIi 7 INCLUSIIVE OF THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF THE
NORTHERLY PORTION OF HLOCK "A" OF '.?'FIE CENTER TRACT~ PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 3, PAGE 22 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF CLAUDINA
STREET, OLD LINCOLN AVENUE (FORMERLY CENTER STREET) AND THE
ALLEY ADJACENT TO SAID LOTS~ ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIHED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF ANAHEIM
BOULEVARD (FORMERLY THE CENTERLINE OF LOS ANGELES STREET)
AND THE CENTERLINE OF OLD LINCOLN AVENUE (FORMERLY THE
CENTERLINE OF CENTER STBEET PER THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF SAID
HLOCK "A") AS SAID INTERSECTION IS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAPS NO.
79-22i~ RECORDED IN BOOK 148, PAGES 27 THROUGH 24
TNCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE
ALONG &AID CENTERLINE OF OLD LINCOLN AVENUE NORTH 75° 27`
55" EASi', 125.27 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF
THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE
NQRTX 75° 27' S5" r^r~ST, 36.31 I'~LT, TO T1IE BEGiNL32NG OF A
CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 133.00 FEET;
THENCE EASTERLY 4.1.08 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17° 41' 51"j THENCE SOUTH 86° 50' 14"
EAST, 71.87 FEET, TO THE SEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 187.00 FEET; THENCE
EASTERLY 57.77 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CEIQTRAL
ANGLE OF 17° 42' 06"; THENCE NORTH 75° 27' 40" EAST, 37.66
FEET, TO THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION OF THE EASTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CLAUDINA STREET (60.00 FEET WIDE)
AS SHOWN ON THE RE-SUBDIVISION OF SAID BLOCK "A"; THENCE
ALONG SAID Pf20LONGATION AND EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
SOUTH 14° 24' 48" EAST, 148.49 FEET, TO A NON-TANGENT CURVE
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.50 FEET AND
TO FIHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE OF SAID CURVE HEARS NORTH 50°
07' 26" WEST; THENCE SOUTH~RLY 18.24 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34° 16' 15" TO THE SOUTHERLY
LINE OF SAID ALLEY (20.00 FEET WIDE) AWACENT TO THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OP SAID LOTS; THENCE NON-TANGENT ALONG THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ALLEY SOUTH 75° 18' 07" WEST, 324.16
FEET, TO A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWE5TERLY AND
HAVING A RADIl3S OF 29.31 FEET AND TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL
LINE OF SAID CURVE BEARS NORTH 58° 15' Ob" EAST; THENCE
NORTHWESTERLY 13.99 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 27° 21' 13" TO THE BEGINNING OL' A REVERSE CURVE
CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 11.31 FEET;
#0360I PC82-213
~~
,.
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY g•92 FEET A~ONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45° 12' 12" TO A NON-TANGENT LINE; THENCE
NORTH 76° 06' 05" ETO /THEOOHEGINNIINGENOF NARCURVE CONCAVE
yJEST, 9.00 FEET,
SOUTHEASTEI2LY 1~1~ F?AVING A RADIUS OF 10.68 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERL7C 9•18 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTR~I,
ANGLE OF 49° 15' 00" TO THE BEGI USNOF 21 OORFE TSE T;EN E
CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RAD
NORTHERLY 36.10 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAI.
CONCAVEFNORTHEASTGRLX ANDT HAVINGIrAI1tA~IAS OF~~10 66 FEETE
CENTCRALNANG ~OFE 9° 151800 EE THENCE NORTH 13 °V5 'r 55OUGF7~ST
9.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 76° 06' 05" WEST, 1.00 FOOT; THENCE
NORTH 13° 53'~O SF~~TESTHENCEaNORTHTI3° H~CE 55~RT~ST6o 9 00
OS EAST, 1.
FEEP TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUT1iEASTERLY 1~N
HAVING A RADIUS OF 11.50 FEET; THENCE NORTHF.ASTERL7C 14.93
FEET ALONG SAID CUR~1E THROUGH A CE~NTV ~EAN CURVE CONCAVE
09" TO THE SEGZNNING OF A
NORTHWESTERLY 11ND HAVING A RADIUS OF 21.00 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERLX 21•76 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH RSE ECURVE
p1~7GLE OF 59° 52' 28" TO THE AEGINN=NG OUS OF~11•50 FEET.
CONCAVE SOUTHEASTEfu.`I ~t1D HAVIt1G A RAD
THE NORTHEASTERL7C TERMINUS OF SAID CURVE BEING TAt3GENT TO A
LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTAIJT SOUTHERLY 1.00 FOOi FROM
SAID CENTERLINE OF OLD LINCOLN AVENIIE; THENCE NORTHWESTERI+Y
14.93 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH LINENNpRTHA75oE 27F 55'
22 ~ p9" ; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALI+ET~ 1.00 FOOT ~
EAST~ 9.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 32' 05" WEST,
TO TEiE TR[7E pOINT OF BEGINNING
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Ananeim cr. :Iovember 29, 1982 at 1:30 p•m•.
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Muni=oPosed rec assification,and
hear and consider evidence for and against said p P
to investigate and make findings and recommendations in cannection therewith;
and
y~ggg~g, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evid~nce and reports offer~d at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner propcses reclassification of subject
property from the CG (Commercial, General) Zono~ercial o£fic bui.lding,Office
and Professioral) Zone to construct a 3-story
Z, That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
general commercial land uses.
3, That thr pYOposed reclassification of subject property is
necesaary and/or deairable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
PC82-213
-2-
~ ~,
4• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposi.tion to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
CG (Commercial, General) Zone to the CO (Conunercial, Office and Professional)
Zone to construct a 3-story commercial office buildina on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.45 acres
located at the southeast corner of Old Lincoln Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard;
and does hereby approve the Negative Beclaration from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impa.ct report on the basis that there would be no
significant individual or cum~.tlative adverse environmental impact due to the
approval of this Negative Declaration since i:he Anaheim General Plan
designates the subject property for general commercial land uses commensurate
with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the
proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitionzr indicates no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that
the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in
the City of Anaheim Planning Depart^+ent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from CG (Commercial, General) Zone to the
CO (COmmercial, Office and Professional) Zone upon the following conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1• That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans oii file with the Office of the Executive Director of
Public Works.
2. That 10-foot curb returns shall be provided at all driveway
epproaches as required by the Cii:y Traffic Engineer.
3. That the petitioner and the City of Anaheim shall enter into a
parking agrPement to provide 92 off-sit~~ parking spaces in a proposed
ci~_y-owned parking Eacility to be constructed on the north side of
Old Lincoln Avenue, eaet of subject property.
4. That the owner(s) of subject property shsll submit a letter
requesting termination of Variance No. 132, to the Plan~iing
Department.
5. That subject pruperty shall be developed substantiall;• in accordance
with plans and ~pecifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 through 6.
-9-
PC82-213
`d3or .,~- ' ---- -
~
,'`"~,
6. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 3 and 4, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution ahall
become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said
conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or
such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
7• That Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be compli.ed
with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon appiicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set fortli. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgement of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TH~ FOREGOING RESOLUTIpN is signed and approved by me this 29th day
of November, ,igg2,
-~
'~HA , ANAHEIM CITY PI~AdQb}' NG COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~~
~~~~w~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STAT~ OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gg,
CITY /JF ANAFIEIM )
2. Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Pianning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November
29, 1982, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: HOUAS, FRY, HERBgT, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMIgg20NERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
IN WITNESS WHEREOL', 2 Have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of
November, 1982,
_ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~(p~il .n
SECRETARl, ANAHEIM CITY PLAIVNING COtI1~IISSION
-4-
PC82-213
~Y3Rf:k.ti~ a.l. ::,.. . _,:~.,.. . :, ... ~. , .. _. .. - . . .