Loading...
PC 82-224,-, RESOL_ UTI _ON NO. PCA2-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3312 SE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance from LOUIS & MANUEL WF_.TER CO., ET AI,,, 9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Snite 212, Hever2y Hills, California 90212, owner, and STOVALL PROPERTIES, 1110 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802, agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California described as: PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN BY THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP RECORDED IN BOpK 22, PAGE 13 OF PARCEL MpPg, ggCORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of. Anaheim on December 13, 1982, at 1:30 p.m,, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 1B.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make flndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and atudy made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the fol'.~~ring £acts: 1• That the petitioner proposes waivers of the following to expand an existing ~otel: ~a) SECTION 18.06.060.0243 - Minimum number of parking spaces and 18.48.066.050 (300 spaces required; 221 s - paces proposed) ~b) SECTION 18.48.062.011 - Maximum structural hei ht (25 1/2 feet permitted 51 feet from single-family residential zoning; 26 1/2 feet proposed). 2• That the above-mentioned waivers are hereby granted on the basis that at the public hearing the petitioner stipulated to: (1) eliminate four units or. the third floor of Huildings A and B, (2) eliminate the balconies at the southern end of Buildings A and B, (3) provide a 10-foot landscaped strip adjacent to the residences to the ~outh, (4) provide an 8-foot block wall along the southern property line, and (5) provide a master television antenna system to improve reception to the residences to the south if the proposed construction interferes with said reception. 3• That there are :xceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the groperty or class of uce in the same vicinity and zone. #0380I PC82-224 y:. , ,_ v~ 4• That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 5• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the prcperty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. 6• That 5 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was rer_eived in opposition to subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL ZMPACT FINDING: That the Ar.aheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand an existing motel with waivers of minimum number o: parking spaces and maximum structural height on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 4.0 acres located at the southwest corner of Katells Avenue and West Street, having approximate frontages of 268 feet on the south side of Katella Avenue and 575 feet on the west side of West Street and further described as 1110 West Katella Avenue (Inn of Tomorrow); and does hereby approve the Neqative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for co~mnercial recreatiott land uses commenaurate with the proposal; that that Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOF1. THEREFORE, HE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commissian does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby ffluZa ~Q be a n~cessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the existing unused driveway on West Street at the most southerly end of the subject property shall be removed and replaced with e standard curb, qutter and sidewalk. 2. That tzash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with aPprove.i plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of public Works. 3. That the westerly drivew.:y on Katella Avenue shall be relocated and the southerly driveway on Weat Street shall be redeaigned as required bY tho City Traffic Engineer. 4. That the existing handicapped parking stalls shall be relocated closer to the existing buildings as required by the City Traffic Engineer. -2- PC82-224 ~ -. 5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and sperifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nus. 1 through 6; provided, however, that the pe*.itioner shall (a) eliminate four units on the third floor :,f Buildings A and B~ (b) eliminate the balconies at the southern end of Buil.dings A and B, (c) provide a 10 foot wide lan3scaped strip aiijacent to the residences to the south, (d) provide an 8-foot block wall along the southern property line, and (e) provide a master television antenna system. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final buildinq and zoning inspec~iotts. BE IT FURTHER R~SOLVED that the r:iaheim City Planning ~ommission does hereby find and determine that adoptirn of this Resolution is er.pressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with eaah and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of December, 1982. ~- CHAI N, ANpHE M CITY ING COMMISSION ~z:.:,.;..,.:. :,.: ATTEST: ' nY~_/~,r~ri ~~~~~~,~_ SECRETARY PRO TEI~ORE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C''1MMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Pamela Starnes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certi£y that the foregoing resolution was passed and aflopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December 13, 1982, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONER,S: 230UAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, iCING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE AB5ENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of December, 1982. ~t~/~/ ~i~%:~1~/~jlii/~f7~~ SECRETARY FRO TEMPORF. ~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC82-22~.