PC 82-35~,
~cso~urion ~io, res2.-;s
P. RG501_UTI n~1 oF TfIE n;JAf(E I M c i ri c~~nri~i i~i~ r,~-~~S i ss t nr~
TiIAT PETITI~~I FnR C~PIDITIf!F1~L ~!SE PCR!~IT ~!~. ?~~~ fiF ~^h,~ITF.D
4lIIF('E/15, the ~.naheim fity P)~nninci f,ommissinn did receive a verified
Petition for Condition~l Use Permit from RICIIP,RD f,. IIIINSAR[P, ?^,P~ ~qain Street,
Santa P,n~, California, °7.7'17, ovrner, of certain real pr~~erty situ~ted
in the City of Anahcir+, Coimty of Orange, State of Californi~, descrihe~i as:
PnRCEL A
PARCGL ~ r15 SHO~I~i o~~ n. ~~n~ ~' I LED I ~! Ei~qi; 1 1"s, P/1~FS ~~ 1 A!ID 1~? OF
~'~.RCEL ttAPS I t! TfiE OFFI CE OF TIIE COUNTY REC~RDFR f1F OR,qllf'E f,OUPITY,
CAL I POR~1 I A.
viir:~~ns, the City Planning Commission did hold a puhlic hearinn at tfie City
liall in the City of Anaheim on Plarch ^, 1~87, at 1;3~ p,m., nntice of said ruhlic
hearing having been duly given as rer~uired by l~t•~ and in accor~lance ~•iith the
provisions of the: Anaheim 1lunicipal Code, Ch:~pter 1R.'13, to he~r and consider
evirlence `or and against said pro~osed conditional use ~ermit ancl t~ investi9ate and
make findings ancf recommendations in connection therer~ith; ind
I/11ERFAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study rrNde
by itself and in its hehalf, and after due conside n tion o` all evidence and reports
offered at said hearin9, does firni and deterr~ine the follo~•~inn facts:
1. Tliat the pro~~sed use ~s pro~erly one for ~•rhich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipat Code Section 1".(1.n(n,~.n~ to o~it'to ~ermit
retail sales in tiie IiL (Industrial, Limited) Znne. ~
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted suhject t~ the petitioner's
stipulation that total retail sales shall be lir~ited to 2; ef the total sales volume of
the business.
3. That the proposed use is herebv granted fnr a period ~f ~~~ (1) year,
subject to reviea~ by the plannin~ Cor~mission for ~ossihle extensions of time.
~E. That the proposed use, as granted, ~•~ill not adversely ~ffpCt the
adjoininp land uses and the 9ro~•ith and development of the area in ~.rhich it is
proposed to be located.
5. That tlie size and sha~e of the site prnposed fnr the use is adec~uate to
allow the full developnent of the proposed use in a manner n~t detrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, healtli, safety, and general o-relfare of tlip Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
~. That the granting of the Condition~l Use Perr~it under the conditions
imposecJ, if any, ~,~ill n~t he detrimental to the ~eace, he~ith, safety and general
welfare of thc Citizens nf the City of Anahein.
PC82-35
t~r ,.:.. .. . . . . . . . . . - . ..
~
7. That the traffic generated by the ~ro~osed use wPll nnt impnse an ur~due
burden upon the streets ~nd hiph~•iays desi~ned and ir~proved tn carry the tr~~fir, in
the are~.
F, That no one indicated their presence at said public he~rin~ in
opposition; and thnt n~ c~rrespondence was received in onpos~ti~n t~ the sub.ject
petition.
EMVIROtJt1E~JT/1L IMPACT FIt,Dfll~: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
revie~:~ed the proposal to permit retail sales in the ~iL (Industri~l, Limited? lone on
an irre~7ularly-shaped p~rcel of lancl consistinr~ oF an~raximately 1.2 acre, hiving a
frontage cf approximately ~ti feet on the south~•~est side of Regal Park Drive, and
bein~ located approximately F•70 feet west of the centerline of f31ue ~um Street (?72~
East Regal Park Drive); and does hereby ap~r~ve the tlegative ~eclarati~n frnm the
requirement to prepare an environmental im~act report on the h~sis that there would
be no si~nificant indivi<lual or cumulative adverse environr~ental imoact due to the
approvai of this tJegative Declaration since the Anaheir~ General Pian desinnates the
sub_ject property for general industr'ial land uses commensurate a~ith the pr~~osal;
that no sensitive environmen:al im~acts are involved in the pr~posai; that the
Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individuai or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the tle!iative ~eclaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of llnaheim Planninq
Department.
NOl•!, THERFFORE, QE IT RCSOL\/ED that the Anaheim City Plannin~ Commission
does hereby grant suh.ject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, ur~n the follcnving
conditions 4lhich are hereby found to be a necessary prere~uisite t~ the ~ronosed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general t•~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheirn:
1. That the a•~ner(s) of s~b,ject prnnPrty shall ~ay the difference between the
industrial and commercial traffic si~nal fees (~rdin:~nce -Jo. 3F~(} f~r 11(•,~
square feet of building, in an amount as determined hy the City Council,
o-~ithin a period of G~ days of apprnv~l bv the Plinning Commission or no
later than ~tay 3, 1~i2.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file ~~ith the City of /lnaheim marl;ed Exhibit
tlos. 1 through 4.
3. That the proposed retail dinner~•~are outlet shall comply with ail sic~ninn
requirements of the P1L zoning.
1~. That the retail sales activiL~es shall be limited to 2a of the total sales
volume.
5. That the proposed use is hereby granted fcvr a period of one (1) year,
subject to reviet~r for nossible extensions of time by the Planning
Commission, upon written renuest fram the ~etiti~ner if it is determined
that the use has not had an adverse im~act on surrounciinq industrial
businesses. -
IiE IT FURTtIEP, P,ESOLVEI~ that the llnaheim Citv Planning Commission does herehy
find and determine that ad~ption of this Resoiution is expressly predicated upon
apnlicant's compliance a~ith each and all of the c~ndittons hereinahove set forth.
-2- Pc82-35 I
/ ~
/'-\
Sh~uld any such candition, or any rart thereof, be declared inv~lid or unen~orceable
by the final judgment of any court of cor:petent jurisdicti~n, then this Res~lution,
and any approvais herr_in contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE rnF~r,o~ r~r. RFSOLUTI (1M i s s i gned and approved by me th i s °th d~y of I~arch,
19$2.
9~ Q. ~~
CNP,IRHAPI, P.NAHE1~1 f,ITY PI.AFI~JIPI~ C014MiSSIOM
ATTEST:
~uC.C~ oL ~ /~i1~~/
SECRETARY, ~qflHEIM ~ITY PLAtI~~INr. COMfllssl~t!
STATE OF CALIF~RIJIA )
COUt~TY OF ORAIlGE ) ss.
CITY OF l1PL~HEll1 )
I, Edith L. Ilarris, SecreCary of the /lnaheim f.ity I'lanninn Commission, do
hereby certi`y tiiat the fore~oing resolution was passed and ~d~~ted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission held on 1larch ?, 1~R2, by the folloi~~inn vote of
the members thereof:
AYLS: COFt1•11SSIOMERS: 6ARtlES, 6USli0RE, FRY, IiERE35T, I:INR, MC QUR~lF.Y
tlOES: COt•1h11S5(O~tERS: QOUAS
AE3SENT: C(1Mt11 SS I Oh1ER5 : ~lOFI[
I t! 4l1TIlESS l•lHEREOF,
have hereunto set my hand this ith day of t4arch, 1~R2,
`~~ •~ 1~~+.~,
SECRETARY, ANqHEIM CITY PL!ItJ!JI~Jr. C~MMISSInr~
-3- PC82-35