PC 82-52RESOLUTIOP! ~10. PC32-52
A RE50LUT1011 OF THE AIJAFIE111 CITY PL/1?1PJIIIR C011F11SSIOtI
TIIAT PETIT1019 FOR f,qPJDITIt1PJAl_ USE PERt11T td~. 7_310 GE f,RAt1TED
1dIiEREI~S, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a veritied
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from STATE COLLEGE ASSOCIAT[5, 359 San
P1iguet Drive ~`304, (lea~port f3each, California, 92(~60, owner, and OP,04![AT FOQDS
COt1PAtJY, ATfE1dT1011: JQIitJ QAICER, it80 South Vaii Avenue, hlontebello, Calif~rnia
90G1+0, agent, of certain real property situatecl in the City of /lnalieim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as:
PAR.CEL 2, IPd ThiE CITY OF APIAIiEi11, COU~ITY OF ORAMGE, STATE OF
CALIFORN1/1, FlS SNOIJN OP! A PARCEL HAP FILED III 6001: 1E~, PAGE 43 OF
PARCEL P1FlPS, I IJ TII[ OFFI CF OF TNE CpUNTY R[CORDER OF SAI D ORANr,E
COUPJ'fY .
b/IiEREAS, the City Piann~no Commission did holcl a public hear~ng at the City
ilrll in the City of Anaheim on htarch 22, 1°$2, at 1:3~ p.m., notice of said public
hE~~r}ng having been duly civen as required by ia~y and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Plunicipal Code, Chapter 18.~3, to hear and consider
evicience for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recorcanendations in connection there~aith; and
4111EREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reoorts
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the follo~•~ing facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~~hich a conditional use
permit is auttiorized by l;nalieim ~iunicipal Code Section ~~.03•~3~•~1~1 to wit: To
permit a retail bakery in the IIL (Indu:trial, Limited) Zone.
2. That rctail sales shalt be limited to eight (3;;) percent of the total
sales volume.
3. That the proposed use, as granted, ti•rill nat adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and devetopment of the area in a~hich it is
proposed to be located.
~F. Tliat the size and shape of the site praposed for the use, as granted,
is adequate to aliow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, ~oill not be detrirt~ental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use ~aill not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and higharays designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
PC82-52
~.
/• Tliat no one indicated tfieir presence at saicl public hearing in
opposition; and that no co;respondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EPIVIROMMEfdTAL IHPACT FIfIDIIiG: That the Anaheim City Plannin_ry Lommission has
reviewed the proposai to permit a retail 6al;ery in the 11L (Industrial, Limited) Zone
on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approxi:nately 1.3 acres having
a frontage of approximately 2l~4 feet on the east side of State College Boulevard,
approximately 185 feet north of the centerline of 1•linston Foad (1310 South State
College Boulevard); and does hereby approve che IJegativr-_ Declaration from the
requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that tfiere would
be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the
approval of this PJegative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the
subject property for general industrial land uses commensurate ~vith the proposal;
that no sensiLive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the
Initia~ Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individua~ or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
s ubstantiating the foregoing findings is on file in ttie City of Anaheim Plar~ning
Department.
tJ06l, TI1ER[FORF, DE IT RESOL'JED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the followtng
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1, That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for street lighting
along State College Boulevard.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property sfiall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for tree planting
purposes along State College Bouievard.
3, Th~t the rnrner(s) of subject property shall pay the ~ifference between the
industrial and commercial traffic signal assessment fees (Ordinance Fdo.
3~96) for an area of 975 sGuare-feet, in an arnount as determined by the City
Council.
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance taith
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marl:ed Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 4,
5, That Condition Ilos, 1, 2, and 3 above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to thr: comn~encement of the activity authorized under this resolution,
or prior to the time that the building permit is issued, or a~ithin a period
of one year from date hereof, whichever occur~ i`~rst, or such further time
as the P;an~ing Commission may grant.
6. That Condition tlo. 4, above-mentioned, shall be comp)ied with prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
-2-
~
CE IT I"URTIIER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this f;esolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance aiith each and all of ti~e conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any sucfi condition, or any ~art thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any c~urt of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall 6e deened null and void.
Tt1E FOREG011JG RESOLUTIOPI is signed and approved by me this 22nd day of
f1arch, 1982.
~~ ~~~
CHA I RMAN, AtlAliE I Pi C I TY 1sLANIJ l t•IG COMM I SS I ON
ATTES7:
. ~
SECRETARY, AFlAtIEIM CITYy PLAN~11~1F11S5101!
STATE OF CALlFORMIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF AfJAliElld )
I, Edith L. Ilarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Ar~aheim City Planning Commission held on hlarch 22, 1982, by the following vote of
the members thereof:
AYES: C0,1MISSIOF![RS: k3ARIJES, f~OUAS, [3USHORE, FRY, HERBST, KID7G
F~OES: COP1t1lSSIOh1EP.S: P10^JE
A[iSENT: COF1M1 SS I ONERS : h1cE3UR(JEY
IF! YIITPJESS WFIEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of March,
1g82.
` ~.~ ~ .,,, -
~ ,~ ~ ~
SE~RETARY, ANAhIEIM CITY PLA~1DItPJG COMMISSION
-3-
PC82-52
r~'--:.:,,.••~..........._._. __.. _ ._.._....,