PC 82-6~-,,
,-,-
---~ ,
RESOLUTIOPI N0. PC32-6
A RESOLUTI ON OF THE ANAHE I l; C ITY P~AP1N I N~ COMM I SS ION
THAT PETITION F012 CONDITIUNAL USE PERMIT N0. 228g gE GRANTED, I~1 PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did recr.tve a vertfied
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from Robert L. and Ethel Wetzler, 959~
Garuen Grove E31vd. f~212, Garden Grove, California, 9261+4, o~aner, and Gregg
Savala, 2952 lJ. Ball Road, Anaheim, California, 92ROh, agent, of certaln real
property sttuated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Callfornia,
described as:
PARCEL 1:
The IJorth half of the North~vest quarter of the Northwest quarter
of the Northa~est quarter of Section 2G, in Township 4 South~ Range
11, West, 1n the Rancl~o Los Coyotes, as shown on a map thereof
recorded in book 51, page 11, Miscellaneous Maps, records of satd
Orange County.
EXCEPTItJG THEREFROM the Easterl•r 1~4.5 feet thereof;
ALSO EXCEPT:~~G THEREFROt1 the North 173 feet of thr_ West 217 feet
the reof ;
WNEREAS, the City Planning Commissfon did hold a puhltc hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anahetm on January 11, 1~82, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by law and ln accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,(13, to hear and consider
evtdence for and against satd proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and reccxnmendatfons in connection therewith; said pub)tc hearing having
been continued to the 'lanning Commissl~n meeting of January 25, T9$2; and
WNEREAS, said Commisslon~ after due inspection, investigat(on and study made
by itsel` and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said heartng, does find and determine the folloa~ing facts:
1. That the proposed use ts properly one for which a conditional use
permit ts authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sectton 18.44.050.010 to wit: to
permit on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant with waiver of:
SECTIOPI 18,05.093.045 - Maximum size of wa11 siqns.
a s gns not exceed ng 2~b of face of
bu ng wa perm tted;
50 and 100$ proposed)
Z. That the requested waiver ~s denied on the basis that approval could
set an undesirable precedent and th~t a hardship was not shown,
PC82-6
,~-~, .-~
r.
3. That the proposed use, as granted, will not adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the gro~.~th and developrnent of the area in which It is
proposed to be located.
4. That the size and shape of the site proposed fo~r the use~ as granted,
is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety~ and general
welfare of the Citizens of the C(ty of Anaheim,
5. 7hat the granting of the Condttional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be datrimental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of tlie City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed usP, as granted, will not
impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways destgned and improved to carry
the traffic tn the area.
7. That no one indicated their f,resence at sald public heartng in
opposition; and that no correspondence ~•~as received in opposition to the subject
petition.
ENVIRONMEt~TAL IMPACT FIP7DING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definitton
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined Tn Paragraph 2 of the City of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from
the requirc~ment to prepare an EIR.
NOIJ, TfiEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant, in part, subject Petitton for Conditional Use Permtt, upon the
following conditions which are herehy found to be a necessary prerequtsite to the
proposed use of the subject aroperty in order to preserve *_he sa`ety and generai
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accor~iance with approved ~lans
on ftle with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance ~vith
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhlbit
Nos, 1 through 4.
3. That Condition P~o, 1, at>ove-mentioned, shall be completed a~ithin a period of
sixty (60) days from the date herein.
BE IT FURT(iER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pla~ning Commission does heP~by
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly pred'cated ;y~,~_~
applicant's compliance ~vith each and all of t~ie condltions hereinahove set forth.
Should any such conditton~ or any part thereof, be deciared invali~i or unen.'orceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent Jurisdtction, then this ~-~lution,
and any approvals h~:rein contained~ shall be deemed null and void.
PCf32-6
Y.fi~='`x;;= `
a._.,....._ . .. .~
r.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIOP! is signed and approved by me this 25th day of
January, 1982.
C~ ~ • J~W~"~.._-
CH lRMAN~ AN HEI!1 CIT LAPJNIPJG COMM SS QN
ATTEST:
lU ~ ~ ~Aw/~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLAPINiNG COM141SSION
STATE OF CALIFORtJIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of tf~e Anaheim City Planning Commiss!on, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 25, 1q$2~ by the foilowing vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOPlERS: 3ARNES, BOUAS, BUSH9RE, FRY, HERBST~ KINR, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: P70PlE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NODJE
It•J WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of January,
1 ~382.
fC/ O~l '~ ` ' ~'~b'rn//w !i
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANPlIN.r, C~MMISSION
PC82-fi