PC 82-8RESOLUTIOIJ N0. PC87_-8
A RESOL~JTION OF TNE ANAHE111 CITY PLANNING CnMMI551~U
THAT PETITION fOR CONDITI~NAL USE PERMIT PIO. 2294 13E GP,At~TED
WHEREAS~ the
Petition for Conditional
Westmont Drive, Anaheim,
Bannon Drive~ Cerritos~
situated in the City
described as:
Anaheim City Planning Commission dtd receive a verifted
Use PermTt from R06ERT K. AND Ml1RY L. WON~, 120~
California, 92801, aoner, and BAP1AR51 L. A~ARIJAL, 13707
Californta 907~1~ ager,t. of certain real property
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
That portion of the Northeast auarter of the Northeast quarter of
the Northeast quarter of Section 12~ Ta•mship !~ South~ Range 11
West. sho~,m as Parcel 1 of Parcel Nap in 8ook 35, paqe 12.
WfiEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 25~ 1q82. at 1:3n p.m,, notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by laa~ and in accordance with the
provislons of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chaoter 18.~3~ to hear and constder
evidence for and agalnst said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connectton therew(th; and
WHEREAS, said Commtsston, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its 6ehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~ohich a conditional use
Fer'r~it Is auLhorized by Rrtshelr~ flurFclp.:~1 Cade Sec[tan i~,4~.Q5'1.,;10 t~ wi t: [o
permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed restaurant.
2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adJoining land uses
and the growth and developm~nt of the area in which tt is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimenta) to the
particular area nor to the peace. health, safety, and general welfare of the Citlzens
of the Ctty of Analieim,
4, That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
imposed~ if any, will not be detrimental to the peace~ heaith, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the oroposed use will not Tmpose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in
the area,
E. That no one indicated their presence at saTd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspon~ence a~as recetved in opposttion to the subJect
petitlon.
PC82-8
ENVIRONMENTAL I!4PACT FI~~DING: That the Anahetm Citv Planning Comm(ssion has
reviewed the proposal to permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed restaurant on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consistin9 of approximately 0.72 acre having a
frontage of approximately 130 feet on the south side of La Palma Avenue,
approximately 290 feet ivest of the centerline of Magnolta Avenue (2632-34 West La
Palma Avenue); and does hereby approva the Negative Declaration from the requirement
to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that there Nould be no
stgnificant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact du~ to the approval
of this Negattve Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
property for general commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no
sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the initlal study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no stgnificant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the NegaYtve Declaration substantiating the foregoing
ftndfngs is on file in the City of Anaheira Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE~ BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject PetitTon for Condttional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general ~~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specificatio~s on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 and 2.
BE IT FLIRiHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Pianning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoptton of this Resoiution is exnressly predicated upon
applicant's compiiance ~vith each and all of the conditions nereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invaltd or unenforceabte
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdlction, then this Resolution~
and any approvals he~etn contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THF FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sig~ed and approved by me this 25th day of
January~ 1982.
ATTEST•
9~ ..-~..~ ~. .~,~5-=-
CHAIRMAP7~ A~AHEIhi CITY PLANNING COMMISSIOM
• le ~G~/ ~~A/~/i.as.
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAPINIPlG COMMI55lON
-2- PC82-8
STATE OF CA~.IFORNIA )
CAUNTY OF OrcAtiG[ ) ss.
CITY OF Ap1AHEIM )
1, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion~ do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January 25, i9$7_, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: CUMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHQRE, FRY~ HERBST, KI~I(;, MC BURNEY
NOES: CG~4MISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMM~SSIONERS: NOME
IP! WITNESS WHERCOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of January,
1g82.
SECRETARY, ANAHETM CI~ LAN~~Ot1MISSION
-3- Pca2-a