PC 82-83RESOLUTION N0. PC82-83
A RESOL'JTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2326 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from ANTRANIK AND VERCIN OZBAG, 1 Plymouth
Irvine, CA 92714, owner, and Robert F. Rife, 1901 East Fourth Street, Santa Ana,
~A 92705, agent, of certain real property~situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as:
THE WEST 230 FEET OF THE NURTH 5 ACRES OF THE WEST 20 ACRES OF THE NORTH
ONE-HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 18, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE
10 WEST, AS PER MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS
MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE 40RTH 254 FEET THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Canmission did hold a public hearing at the City
Hall in the City of Anaheim on May 3, ~982, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against sa~d proposed conditinnal use permit and to investigate
and make findings and recoromendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Cortmission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the followings facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit
is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.050 to wit:to permit
a veterinary hospital in the CL (Commerciai, Limited} Zone.
2. That the proposed use is hereby aranted for a period of one (1) year,
subject to review by the Planning Commission for possible extensions af eime to
determine whether or not the use has had a detrimental effect on the adjacent
residential area.
3. That the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the following stipul-
ations made by the petitioner at the public hearir~g;
a. That no animal board and care facilities, other than the overnight
stays of animals in connection with the normal veterinary hospital
functions, shall be maintained on the facilities.
b. That all animals shall be confined inside the building at all times.
c. That sound ~ttenuation measures shall be provided inside the building,
if needed, in order that no animal noises or sounds are discernable
outside the building at the property lines.
4. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the g~owth and davelopment of tfie area in which it is proposed to be located.
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the porposed use in a manner n~r detrimental to
the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and genaral welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
PC82-83
6. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general
~aelfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic
in the area.
e
8. That 20 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that a petition containing approximately 64 signatures was received
in opposition to the subject petotion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal to permit a veterinary hospital in the CL (Commercial,
Limited) Zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land ~ansisting of approximately
0.3 acre, having a frontage of approximately 79 feet on the east side of Magnolia
Avenue and being located.approximately 250 feet south:uf'the centerline of~Lincoln•
Avenue (116 South Magnolia Avenue);and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report on the basis that
there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact
due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan
designates the subject property for corixnercial professional land uses commensurate
with the proposal; that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the
porposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no sognifi-
cant individual or cumulative adverse environmental lmpacts; and tliat the Negative
Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of
Anaheim Planning Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
conditions which are hereby Found to ba a necessary prerequisite to the proposed
use of the subject property in ord:r to preserve the safety and general welfare of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That vehicular access to and from the property as well as on-site
vehicular circulation shall be subject to the review and approval
by the City Traffic Engineer.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 and 2.
3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complcied with
prior to final bnilding and zoning inspections.
4. That no animal shall be boarded at the premises except for o'vernight
stays in connection with normal veterinary hospital functions.
5. That all animals shatl bo confined inside the building at all times.
6. That sound attenuation measures shall be installed, if needed, to prevent
any animal noises from being heard outside the building at the pr•operty
lines.
PC82-83
-2-
7. That the use is approved for one (1) year at which time and upon written
request uy the petitioner, the use may be extended if there has been no
detrimental effect on the adjacent residential properties.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolutio~,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREG01~^ RESOLUTION is signed and approved by this 5th day of May,
1982.
~...k~ GZ • ~.~.-.,.~...
ATTEST: CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
n ~-~l K ~w ~ •
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby, certify that the foregoing resolutio~i was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 5, 1982, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYtS: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES, BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRi, HERBST, K)NG, h!C 8tlP,NEY
NOES; COMMISS10tdERS: N(~NE
ABSENT: CUMMfSSIONERS: NuNE
IN WITNF_SS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of May, 19$~,
~~2~ .~° ~r,ti,~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3-
PC82-83