PC 82-85~S~ /~\
R[SOLUTION H0. PC~i7_-35
A RESOLUTIQ~! OF TNE AtlAiIEIM C~TY PLA~l~JIMG COMMISSIO~•I
THAT PETiTIO~J FOR RECLASSIFICATIOt! ~JO. 3t-B2-2n BE GRAFITED,
WNEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from [LSIF R, LUSIGEY, 60S East [3roadway, Anaheim,
Californta 92f305, owners, of certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of prange, State of California, d~scribed as follows:
LOTS 52 A~in 53 APJD TI1E EASTERLY 2 FEET OF LOT 54 IN DLO.r,K F OF TI1E
HOTEL DEI. CAMPO TRACT, I I! THE C I TY OF AFIAH[ I M~ COUPITY QF ORAMGE ~
STATE OF Cl1LIFOR~lIA AS PER t9AP REC~RDED I~~ E30~1< 24, PAGES 69 A~ID
70 QF MISCELLAP~EOUS RECORDS OF LOS A~lGEL[S COU!JTY, CALIFORNIA.
WNEREAS, the City Planning f.ommission did hold a pui~lic hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on May 17, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been ~vly given as required by laa~ and in accordance wlth the
provisions of the Anahetm Municipal Code, Chapter 13.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
IJHEREAS, said Commission~ after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and arter due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
1. ThaY the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject pro~erty from
the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) zone to the 11L (Industrial, Limited) zone
to expand an existing tndustrial manufacturing facility.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan dESignates sul~.ject ~roperty for medium
density residential land uses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of suhject pronerty is necessary
and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community because
adjacent properties are zoned for and developed with industrial uses.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly
relate to the zones and their permttted uses locally establisiied in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses gener~lly established
throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclasstfication of subject property re~uires the
improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the C~rculation Element of the
General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated hy
the intensification of land use.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the sub_ject
petition.
Pc82-85
EWVIROIJNEWTAL IMPACT FIIlDI~IG: That the Anaheim City Plannin9 Commission has
reviewed the proposal to reclassi y subject property from the RM-120~ (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone to the ML (Industrial, Limited) lone to expand an existing
industrial manufacturing facility on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting
of approximately 6,994 square feet, havin9 a frontage of appr~ximately 57_ feet on the
south side of Eiroadtvay, 1'13 feet east of the centerline of ICroeger Street (G08 East
Groadway); and does hereby approve the Plegative Declaration from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report on the basis tliat there would be no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental irnnact due to the approval
of this IJegative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject
pro~erty for medium densilty residPntial land uses commensurate with the pronosal;
that no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; tha the
Initial Study submit'red by the petitioner indicates no significant tndividual or
cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning
Department.
IaOW, TIfEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing, that Title
18-Zonfng of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zonr_ and to tncorporate said
described property into the F1L (IndustrTal, Limited) 7_one upon the following
conditions whi~:ii are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pronosed use
of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Cittzens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the oi•rner(s) of suhject property shall pay tfie traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3396) in an amount as determined by the City
Council, for industrial buildings prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
2. That the owner(s) of sul~ject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for street lighting
along E3roadway.
3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance ~aith approved plans
on fite with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Worlcs.
4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 3, provided, however, that the proposed truck driveway from
f3road~aay shall be redesigned to the satisfaction of the City Traffic
Engineer to eliminate the backing of trucl<s onto 6roadway.
7. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subJect property,
Condition ~Jos. 2, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provisions or
rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of
tlie Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied with a~ithin one
year from the date hereof, or such furthar ttme as the Planning CommissTon
may grant.
6. Tliat Condition Wos. 3, and !~, above-mentioned, shall be com~lied with prior
to final buiiding and zoning inspections.
-2- PC82-85
' „u-.,:~.~w,~.~.~....,...,~......_<_._.____...
~ r.. _
_
,--~
DE IT FURTIi[R RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine tl~at the adoption of tliis Resolution Ps expressly predicatPd upon
applicant's compliance ~vith each and ali of the condittons hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof~ he declared invalid or unenforteable by the
final judgment of any court of competent _jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, sliall be deemed null and votd.
Tf~E FOREGOI~JG RESOLUTIOIJ is signed and approved by me this 17th day of May,
1g82.
~ ~~
CII i A PRO TE!1PORE
ATTEST: APJAHE 1 M C I TY PLAtdN I Nr, COHF SS I ON
SECRETARY, AtJAHE I M C I TY~PLAp~N ~ ~~g COMM I SS I
or~
STATE OF CALIFORFJIA )
COUhlTY OF ORAMGE ) ss.
CITY 0~ AtlANEIM )
~, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Cor~mission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Commiss(on held on 11ay 17, 1~i32, at 1:3n p,m,~ by the
follov~ing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMFIISSIONERS: BARPlES, DOUAS, FRY, lIERDST~ KIFJr,.~ Mr, DURn1EY
NOES: COMMISSIOtlERS: tJO~dE
ABSEtdT: COMMISSIOtJERS: BUSfIORE
I-J WITPJESS WIIEREOF, I have here~to set my hand this 17th day of ~4ay, 19g2,
~Q.[.,P~G. ,~ ~-1~~^ ^~
SECRETARY, APlA11EIN CITY PLA~JNIN~ COMMISSION
-3- PC82•~o5