PC 82-98~~..:~~:.:~,~ :~:: ,_ . .. .
R[SOLUTION I~O. PCB2-98
A RESOLUTIOM OF ThIE AidNiEIN CITY ?LAPIPJIPlG COt1FllSS101!
TfIAT PE71T10~•! FOR COtdDIT10~lAL US[ PER~iIT N0. 233o E3E GftAN7ED
Wf{EREAS, the Anafieim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Peti tion for Condi tional Use Permi t from VERtJOPJ bl, r•tONROE AND I•11CK BECKER, 163G
Sequoia, /lnaheim, California, 92801, o~mers, and of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARC[L 2, CITY OF IINAHEIM, COUPJTY OF ORAPlGE, S7ATE OF CALIFORPlIA,
AS SilOl•1N 0~! A t•tAP FI LED I P~ C00lG 122, PAGES 11 APlD 12 OF PARCEL
Pt/1PS, I N THE OFFI CE OF THE COUtiTY RECORDER OF SAI D COUPITY.
: ;i
4lHEREAS, the City Planning Cortmission did hold a public hearing at the City
Flall in the City of Anaheim on t1ay 17, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public
hearin9 having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim ~tunicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recammendations in cannection thereo-~ith; and
41fIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ali evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and detcrmine the follouring facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for ~•~hich a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim tiunicipal Code Section 18.61.050.050 to o~it to
permit an automobile whoiesaling facility in the ~!L (industrial, Lir~ited) Zone.
2. That tfie proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the grn,,rth and develo~r~nr. of the area in ~•rhich lt is propesed to bc located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the ~se is adequate to
allov~ the full development of the proposed use in a manner not ~!etrimental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general ~.+elfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions
irrposed, if any, wiil not be detrirrental to the peace, health, safety and general
welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. Tha t the tra f f i c gene ra ted by the p roposed use Ur i 1 1 not i mpose an un due
durden uoon the streets and liighi•aays designed anJ improved to carry the traffic in
the area.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to the subject
petition.
EPIVIROPlME~dTAL IMPACT FIFlD1PJG: That the Anaheim City Planning Cor.xnission has
reviewed the proposal to permit an autortnbile a~holesaling facility in the ML
PC82-98
.~ _
(Industriai, Limited) 'Lone on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 2.5 acres, having a frontage of approximately 2G0 feet on the east side
of Clementine Street, and being located approximately 205 feet north of the
centerline of Freedman Way( 1G16-1G18 South Clementine Street); and does hereby
approve the Negative Declaration from the requirertent to prepare an environmental
irtpact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental irrpact due to the approval of this Negative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for
commercial recreation land uses comnensurete a~ith the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initiai Study submitted
by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing
findings is on file in the City of Flnaheim Planning Department.
iJOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
dces hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the foliowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use
of the sibject property in order to preserve the safety and general o-~elfare of the
Citizens of the City of ~lnaheim:
1. That ail automobile storage and autorrobile sales shall be conducted entirely
within the building.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance a~ith
ptans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
tJos . 1 th rough 3.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance a~ith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenfarceable by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resoiution, and any
approvals herein contained, sliall be deemed null and void.
TI1E FOREGOIPlG RESOLUTIOPI is signed and approved by me this 17th day of Ptay,
7982.
11~~~~~//~ i~
CII I P~h1AN PRO TEMPORE
AtJFlHEIht CITY PL/1~JNIPJG C0~1 SSlOP~
ATTEST:
` ~ ~~ ,~° ~~.
SECR[TARY, AplAllEltl CITY PLAP;MItJG corir~issio~i
-2- Pc82-98
STATE OF CALIFORNI!', )
COUNTY OF OftA~GE ) ss.
C I TY OF AiJAFIE I M )
~, Edsth L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahcim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution ~•~as passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Cortmission held on ~1ay 17, 19~2, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of the merri~ers thereof:
AY[S: COF1~11SSIOMERS: f3ARJ~ES, I30UAS, FRY, HERBST, I;IPIG, F1C f3URMEY
NOES: C0;IMISSIONERS: Nt~l~IE
ABSENT: COfM11SSI0NEftS: BUSIiOP,E
Ihl WITNESS Wfir:REOF, I havc hereunto set my hand ttiis 17th d~y of May, 19$2,
6~-c~~ .~ ~.~.~:.
• ECRETARY, /UJAHEIM CITY PLAPlNItdG COt1MISSION
-3- PC82-98