PC 82-99~
RESOLUTION rio, rc8~-~g
A RESOl,UT I Otl OF TI IE AtlAfl[ I M C I TY PLArIr! I NS COt4M I S5 I 0~!
TNqT PETITIOIJ FOR COtJDITIOtJAL USE PERMIT tJO. 233( f3F. .r,RqtdTEO
WFIEREAS. tlie Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a vertfied
Petition for Conditional Use Perr~it from SA"!TA ANITA DEVEL~PMEr~T C~RP~RATION,
363 San t4iguel Drive, tJewport Deach, Cal i fornia, 92660, cn•rner, and JOSF SARACHO,
312 W. Victoria Avenue. Montebello, California ~3~6h0, agent, of certain real
property sttuated in the C~ty of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARCEL 3 OF PARCEL 14AP 79-272 ItJ TIIE CITY OF A~JAHEIM, C~UPITY pF
~RDIIG17 S~TFTEPARCELL~MAPS,AI~IATHEEOFFICE~OFETHE'JCOUiTY~RECnRnER OF
SAID COU~~TY.
W~~EREAS, the CiCy Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City
liall in the City of Anaheim on P1ay 17, 1932, at 1:3D p,m., notice of said public
hearing hiaving been duly yiven as requtred by law and in accordance with the
provisions of tl~e Anaheim Munlcipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make `indings and recommendatlons in connection theretvith; and
W1IEREAS~ said Commission, after due inspection, fnvestigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf~ and afr_er due constderation of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
i. That the proposed use ls properly one for whtch a conditional use
permit is autliorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18,k4.050,010 to wit:to permit
on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant.
Z. That the proposed use will not adverselv affect ttie ad}oinfrtg tand uses
an~i the gro~vth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be iocated.
3. That the size and shape of the stte proposed for the use is adequate to
allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrtmental to the
particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, an~i general a~elfare of the Citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permtt under the conditions
welfare~offtheYCitizens~ofbtheeCityeofaAnahetme ~eace, healtli, safety and general
5. That the trafftc generated by the proposed use wt)1 not impose an urtdue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the trafftc in
the area.
~• That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
oppositton; and that no correspondence was received in oppnsition to the subject
petition.
Pc82-99
~~_.
~~, . ____ - ,.
Et~VIRONMEIlTAL INPACT FIhJUING: The Planning Director or his authortzed
representative has determined that the proposed prnject falls within the definition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
~~~~~~, TfIEREFORE, [3E IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commisslon
does hereby grant subject Petttion for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following
condltions whicli are hereby found to be a necessary prerequtsite t~ the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve tlie safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Rnaheim:
1. That additional trash storage areas shall be ~rovfded on-site in accordance
with approved plans on file ~vith the f)ffice of the Executive Director of
Public Works.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specificattons on file with the City of Anaheim marked Fxhibit
tJos. 1 and 2.
3. That Condition No, 1, above-mentioned, shail be completed prior to
commencement of the activity authorized by this conditional use oermit.
4- That Condition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complted with prtor to final
building and zoning inspections.
DE IT FURT}1ER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P)anning Commtsston does hereby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolutton is e:cpressiy predicated upon
applicant's compitance wlth each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, the~ this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed nu11 and void,
TIiE FOREGOI~J~ RL•SOLUTlQ!t is signed and aoproved by me this 17th day of May,
t982.
H RP1A~1 PRO TEMPOR[
ATTEST: ~'lANEIM CITY PLANPIING COt•1MISSI~tJ
~~ ~~ Lll_F1it.S.,cr
SECRETARY, AIJAHEIM CITY PLAMNING COMMISSIOh!
-2- Pc82-99
~
EIJVIROPI~IEFlTAL 1~1PACT FINDItl~: Tfie Planning Director or his authorized
representative has determined that the proposed pr~ject falls a~ithin the deflnitton
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in the State [IR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR,
1~041, THEREFORE, DE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commtssion
does hereby grant sut~ject Petition for Condittonal Use Permit, upon the follo~•~ing
conditions whicli are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite t~ the proposed use
of the subject property in order to preserve tfie safety and general welfare of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That additional trash storage areas shall be provided on-site in accordance
with approved plans on ftle ~.vith the Off(ce of the Executive Director of
Publ ic 1Jorks.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
IJos. 1 and 2.
3. That Condition ~lo. 1, ahove-mentioned, shall be completed prior to
commencement of the activity authorized by this conditional use oermit.
4. That Condition No. 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
DE IT FURTfiER RESOLVED that the Anat~eim City Planning Commtssion does her'eby
find and determine that the adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabnve set forth.
Should any condition or any part tt~ereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the
final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then rhis Res~lution, and any
approvals herein contained~ shall be deemed null and void.
TIiE FOREGOI~~G R[SOLUTIODI is signed and approved by me this 17th day of May,
1982.
~ ~ /%~~.
CH'~fRMAN PRO TEMPORE
A~IANE I M C I TY PLAP11t I Nr, COMM I SS I ~~~
ATTEST:
~Q.c~ ~.- ?~.:
SECRETARY, ANAIfE1M CITY PLANNI~~r, COMMISSIOP!
-2- PC82-99
,~
~,iw[y.;~s.:;v ;,.:.,o; ,..,:r.. ,...... ..,._ ....:. ........ . . . . . . . .
~
STATE OF CALiFOP.NIA )
COUNTY OF OFAtIGE ) ss.
CITY OF AtJAHEIF1 )
I, Edith L. liarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commissiun, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the ~lnaheim City Planning Commission held on May 17, 1~~32, at 1:3~ p.m., by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: QARtIES, DOUAS, FRY, IiERDST, I<I"Ir,, Mf. [3UP.~lEY
NOES: C0~4MISSIONERS: PJONE
ABSEhIT: COh1Ml SS I O~IERS : BUSHQRE
ItJ lJlTNESS l•Jt1ERE0F, I have hereu~to set my hand this 17th day of May, 1982.
`~~.C~ ~ i~'-~(.(/Ltt.
SECRETARY, AFIANEIt4 CITY PLA!lNING C~MMISSIQN
-3- PC82-99
~~