Loading...
PC 83-111RESOLUTION NO. PC83-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETIiION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 82-83-34 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification from WILL D. AND LUCILLE C. PICXEREL, 2752 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California 92804, ownecs, and ALVIN A. SUGARMAN, 8071 Slater Avenue, Suite 210, Huntington eeach, California 92647, agent of certain teal property situated in the City of Anaheim, Cuunty of Orange, State of California, described as follows: PARCEL 1: THE EAST o6 FEET OF THE WEST 132 FEET OF THE EAST 793 FEF,T OF THE NORTH 330.31 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST~ S.B.B. & M. PARCEL 2: THE WEST 66 F'EET OF THE WEST 132 FF:ET OF THE EAST 753 EEET OF THE NORTH 330.31 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 24, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, S.B.B. & M. WH~REAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on June 13, 1983 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, anc' after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the foZlowing facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to construct a 22-unit apartment compl.ex. 2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for medium density residential land uses. 3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is ner.essary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community. 4. That the proposed reclassification of subject pr.operty does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. 5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulation Element of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of land use. Q06671 PC83-111 ~.......... . _ . /"1. /~'• 6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspon~Jence was received in opposition to subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to construct a 22-unit apartment complex on a rectangularly-shaped par~~l of land consistiny of approxi.mately 0.8 acre located at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Sharon Circle, and further described as 2752 West Ball Road; and does hereby approve the Negative Declacation from the requisement to prepare an enviconmental impact report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim Genecal Plan designates the subject property for medium-density residential land uses commensurate with the proposal; ttiat no sensitive environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim Planning Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassificatian and, by so doin9, that Title 18-ZOning of the anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said desccibed property into the RM-120D (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a fee for street lighting alonq Ball xoad and Sharon Circle in an amount as determined by the City Council. 2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a fee for tree planting ourposes along Ball Road and Sharon Circle in an amount as determined by the City Ceuncil. 3. That prior to issuance oP a building permit, appropriate water assessment fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim, in an amount as determined by the Office of the Utilities General Manager. 4. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City oF Anaheim in an amount as determined by *.he City Council. 5. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Co~ncil for eacii new dwellin9 unit. 6. That the owner of subject property shall recor9 an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City of Anaheim for a strip oi land 53 feet in width from the centerline of tiie street along Ball Road and 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street alon~ Sharon Circle for street widening nurposes. _2_ PC83-lIl , --.., . ~~ ~''~. .-. 7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 8. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 9. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the I'ire Department. 10. That trash Storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the Street Mai~tenanre and Sanitation Division. 11. That sidewalks shall be installed along Sharon Circle as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer. 12. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the design and width of all ariveways shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 13. That gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates within a distance of forty (40) feet from said public street rights-of-way shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer. 14. That prior to issuance of building pecmits, the applicant shall present evidence satisfactory to the Chief Building Inspector that the proposed project is in conformance with Council Policy Number 542 "SOUnd Attenuakion in Residential Projects". 15. That sutject property shall be developed substantially in accordance wiEh plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 16. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 6, above-mentioned, stiall be completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date of this resolution, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant. 17. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 7, 8, 10, 11 and 15, above-mentioned, shall be complio~l with. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City tlanning C~_..imission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Reso.lution is expressly predicated upen applicant's compliance with each and '1 of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, o: iy part thereof, be ~eclared invalid or unenforceable by tne final judgemnt of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, anc any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. '3' PC$3-111 .+'~ ~~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 13th day of June, ].983. ~ ~ ~a ~J ~ CHA A, ANAHEIM CITY NNING COMMISSION ATTEST: l0 ~ f ~n - SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s~. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) i, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoin9 resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 13, 1983, by the following vot? of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIOt7ERS: BOUAS, SUSHORE, FRY, KING, LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSEAIT: COPiMZSSIONERS: HERBST IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of June, 1963. / l.J~/~~ ,// n V C.~-~ f // A^ . SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSION -4- PC83-111