PC 83-134RESOLUTION NO. PC83-134
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMI.iSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE YERMIT NO. 2469 BE GRANTED, IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City 2lanning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from BROOKSIDE ENT~RPRISES, INC., Old
Guasti, California 91743, uwner, and U. E. BAUEk, ARCHITECT, 17390 McAllister,
Riverside, California 92503 & MRS. D;YUNG SHIK YON, 735 South Beach Boulevard,
Anaheim, California 92804, age~ts of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
BEGINNING AT A LOINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF
QF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
18, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND
MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 255.41 FEET NORTH OF THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF, AND RUNNING THENCE
WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF,
440.00 FEET; THENrE NORTH PARALiEL TO IHE EAST LItdE OF SAID
SOUTH ~NE-HALF, 198.00 FEF.T; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF 440.00 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE EAST LINE OF THE SAID SOUTH ONE-HALF; THENCE SOUTH ALONG
SAID EAuT LINE 198.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNZNG~
CONTAINING 2.00 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on .7uly 1J., 1983, at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing havin9 been continued to the Planning
Commission meel•ing of August 8, 1983; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation an9
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followic~g facts:
1. That L-he proposed use is properly one £or which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.010 &
18.44.050.160 to wit: to permit a 107-unit motel and restaurant with on-sale
alcoholic bev?rages in the CL (Commercial, Limited) zone with waivers of:
(a) SECTION 18.44.062.011 - Maximum structucal heiqht
(b) SECTION 18.44.063.010 - Minimum front landscaoed setback
(c) SECTION 18.44.063.040 - Minimum landscaoed setback adiacent to
residential zone boundary
2. That the requested waivers (a), (b) and (c) are not necessary
because revised plans were submitted, eliminating the need for said waivers.
#0007r PC83-134
i /"„~
3. That the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the
Following stipulations made by L•he petitioner at the public hearing:
(A) That aluminum louvered privacy screens shall be placed on
all third story windowG, and also on a1.1 second story
windows if it is determined that there is visual invasion
from subject motel to tiie adjacent residents' yards and
homes from said second story windows; and that an eight
~8) foot high aluminum louvered privacy screen shall be
provided to enclose the sundeck area.
(B) That an eight (8) foot high concrete block wall shall be
constructed on the south and west property lines prior to
commencement of constiuction of the motel building.
(C) That the stairway on the west shall be fully enclosed to
pcevent any visual invasion of the residential properties
to the west.
4. That the proposed use, as qranted, will not adversely affect
the adjuininq land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it
is proposed to be located.
5. That the si°e and shape of the site proposed for the use, as
granted, is adequate to allow the fvll development of the pcoposed use in a
manner not detrimenta~ to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens af the City of Anaheim.
6. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
7. That the traffic generated by the proposed use, as granted,
will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and
improved to carry the traffic in the area.
8. That 18 persons indicated their presence at the July 11, 1983
public hearing in opposition and 4 persons indicated their presence at the
August 8, 1983 public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was
received in opposition to the subject petit~on.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDIN~~: :'hat the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to pe:mit a 107-unit motel and restaurant
with on-sale alcoholic beverages in the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.73 acres
having a frontage of approximately 198 feet un the west side of Brookhurst
Street, approximately 125 feet north of the centerline of Stonybrook Drive and
further described as 711 South Brooknurst Street; and does hereby approve the
Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact
report on the basis that there would be no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for
general commercial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submilted by the petitioner indicates no signi:icant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Department.
_2_ PC83-134
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grar.t subje=t Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens oE the City of Anaheim:
1. That street lighting facilities along Brookhurst Street shall be
installed as required by the Utilities General Man+sger in accordance
with specifications on fi.le in the Uffice of Utilities General
Mana9er, and that security in the form of a bon9, certificate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City
to guarantee the satisfactory completion of the above-mentioned
improvements. Said security shall be posted with the City of
Anaheim prior to approval of building permits. The above-required
imptovements shall be installed prior to occupancy.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for new commercial
buildin9s.
3. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants
shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provi.ded in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
That subject propezty shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City uf Anaheim
marked Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3; provided,
howev~r, that kitchen efficiency units may be installed in no more
than twenty-five percent (25$) of the motel units, with a maximum of
6-cubic foot refrigeratocs, two-burner stoves excluding oven and
baking facilities, and single compartment sinks, except that the
manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities; that
aluminum louvered privacy screens shall also be placed on all
third-story windows; that aluminum louvered privacy screens shall
also be placed on all second-story windcws if it is determined that
there is visual invasion from subject motel to the adjacent
resident's ~/ards and homes fcom said second-story windows; that an
eight (8) foot high aluminum louvered privacy screen shall enclose
the sundeck area; and that the westerly staicway shall be er~closed
to insure the pri.vacy of the homeowners to the west.
6. That prior to commencement cf construction of the building, a 8-foot
high block wall (measured from the highest point of the adjacent
finished qrade) shall be constructed along the west and south
property lines .
7. That prior to final buildiiig and zoning inspectiuns, Ccndition Nos.
4 and 5, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
_g_ PC83-134
BE IT FURTHEP. RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the condi.tions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of. any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be ~eemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 8ty day
of August, 1983.
CHAI MAN, ANAHEIM ~ITY P NING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~lY~Q ~ F~L w__~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF O.RANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the fore9oin9 resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 8,
1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ FRY, HERBST, KING~ LA CLAIRE, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMNISSIONERS: NOtdE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of
August, 1983.
~~~_~~~ ~ ~~l.~.r..~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4-
PC83-134
a.
0