PC 83-15~
r„ ~-, ~ -.
.
RESOLUTION NO. PC83-15
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2407 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit £rom EXXON COMPANY, U. S. A., P. O. Box
16118, Long Beach, California 90806, owner, and MURRAY'S/ADELMAN ENTERPRISES,
INC., 740 [9est Santa Barbara, Los Angeles, California 90037, agent of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, describzd as:
PARCEL 1: THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 IN TRACT N0. 71,
AS SHOWN OL: A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 10~ PAGE 22 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHIJEST CORNER OF LOT 3 IN SAID
TRACT NO. 71~ SAID SOUTHWEST CORNER BEING FOR THE
PURPOSE OF THIS DESCRIPTION THE EAST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 SOU~H, RANGE 10
F7EST, S.B.M., AS SAID QUARTER CORNER IS SHOWN ON A
MAP OF TRACT NO. 964, RECORDED IN BOOK 31, PAGES
46 AND 47 OF MISCELLRNEOUS MAPS, FECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 00" EAST
ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 A DISTANCE
OF 175.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° O1" 00" EAST
180.00 EEE4'; THENCE SOUTH 89° 59' 00" WEST
PARALLEL WITfI SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 3 AND TEIE
WESTERLY PROLONGATIOr7 THEREOF 207.66 FEET TO A
POINT IN THE CENTERLINE OF STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD~ 60.00 FEET WIDE. (FORMEI2I+Y 1'LACENTIA
pVEC7UE) AS SAID CENTERLINE ~vAS DESCRIBED IN DEED
TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, RECORDED MARCH 22, 1920
IN BOOK 358, PAGE 19 OF DEEDS, Rr.CORDS OP OTLi12IGE
COWiTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 0° 09' 03" WEST
ALONG SAID CENTERLINE 4.57 FEET TO THE BEGINNING
OF A TANGENT CURVE THEREIN CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING
A RHDZUS O'r' 426.92 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG
SAID CURVE AND ALONG SAID CEN".'F.RLINE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 16° 00' 00" AN ARC DISTANCE OF
119.22 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT REVERSE
CURVE IN SAID CENTERLINE CONCA:~IE WESTERLY HAVING A
RADIUS OF 426.92 FACT; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
CURVE AND ALONG SAID CENTERLINE THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 7° 55' 20" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 59.03 FEET
TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 3; THENCE NORTH 89° 59' 00"
WEST ALONG SAID WESTERLY PROLONGATION 4.24 FEET TC
THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
~0439I
PC83-15
~:~
~ ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on January 10, 1983 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance witn the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make f~_ndings and recor,¢nendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing havi.ng been continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of January 24, 1983; and
~~REAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due conside~-ation of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.03.030.010 to
wit: to retain a travel and ticket sales agency in the ML (Industrial,
Limited) zone.
z• That the proposed use is hereby denied on the basis that the
original conditional use permit to permit the travel ticket agencp was granted
subject to conditions requiring the removal of a temporary trailer, removal of
underground gasoline tanks, closure of existing driveways near the
intersection of Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard, and full
demolition or complete remodeling of the existing service station building and
to date, sever.al of these conditions have not been satisfied; and also on the
basis that the use is not proper for this industrial area.
3. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located.
4. That the size and shape of the sire proposed for the use is not
adequate to allow the full development oE the p.roposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will be detrimental to the peace, health, safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will impose an
undue burden upon the street^ and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area.
7• That no one indicated their oresence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in op~osition to the
subject petitlon.
ENVIRON:tc;NTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission ha5 reviewed the proposal to retain a travel and ticket sales
agency in the NII, (Industrial, Limited) Zone on an irregularly-shaped parcel o.f
land consistiny of approximately 0.43 acre located at the southeast corner of
Orangewood Avenue and State College Boulevard, and further described as 2100
South SLate College Boulevard (MUrray's); and does hereby approve tlie Negative
'2' PC83-15
.~
,.~,
Declaration from the requirenent to prepare an environmental impact report on
the basis that there would be no significant individual or ctiunulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative Oeclaration sin~:e
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general
industrial land uses commensurates with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
a3verse environmental impacts; and that the Negative Declaration
substantiating ktie foreyoing findings is on file in the City of Anaheim
Planning Departnent.
NOW, THEREFORE, gE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, on
the basis of the aforementiuned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 24th day
of January, 1983.
~
CH IRMAN, p.Np.HEIM CITY ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ,~ ^"~'' ...r. ~
SECRETARY, 1~Np.HgIM CITY P:,ANNING CO~pN
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foreg~ing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Pl.anning Commission held on January
24, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BpUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, Lp CI,AIgE~
MC SIIRNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NpNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 24th day of
January, 1983.
r ._ . . . . ~ _.
~d~z'~ ,1°~~,,~
SECRETpFty~ p,N~[gTM CITY PLANtd2NG COMMISSION
-3-
PC83-15