PC 83-154r-.. ,,,~,
RESOLUTION N0. PC83-154
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2482 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from THE HUSTON BUILDING, 438 E. Katella,
Suite H, Orange, California 92667, owner, and JOSAM OZYP, 7227 Cedar, San
Bernardino, California 92406, agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as:
PARCEL 1:
LOT 100 OF TRACT N0. 2302, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 76, PAGES 29, 30, AND 31 OF MISCELLANFOUS
MAPS~ IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL 2:
THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 3 AND 6 OF MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF
ANAH'IM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ AS PER MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 4, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, INCLUDED WITHIN
THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LAND:
BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTH LIN~ OF THAT PORTIODI OF THE
EAST 250.00 FEET OF SASD LOT SIX, LYING NORTH OP A LINE
PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT SIX ANA PASSING
THROUGH A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF HARBOR BOULEVARD~ FORMERLY
SPADRA ROAD~ AS SAID ROAD EXISTING APRIL 29~ 1929, DISTANT
712.00 FEET NORTH OF THE CENTERLINE OF ROMNEYA DRIVE, DISTANT
ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89° 33' 18" WEST A DISTANCE OF
42.69 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SAID HARBOR BOULEVARD~ 60.00
FEET WIDE~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT td0. 2302, RECOADED I[J
BOOK 76~ PAGES 29 TO 31~ INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~
RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH
LINE NORTH 89° 33' 18" WEST A DISTANCE OF 207.23 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF THE EAST 250 FEET OF SAID LOT SIY.; THENCE ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 250 FEET OF SAID LOT SIX, NORTH 0°
26' 42' EAST A DISTANCE OF 86.92 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80° 06'
00° EAST A DISTANCE OF 117.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 43' 09
EAST A DISTANCE OF 73.1b FEET; THENCE SOUTfI 15° 55' 24' EAST
68.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID LANil IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN ON A MAP FTLED IN
BOOK 67~ PAGE 49 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS IN THE OFFICE OF SAID
CUUNTY RECORDER.
YARCEL 3:
THAT PORTION OF I,OT 6 OF MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORllED IN
BOOK 4~ PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOOS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THF,
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID l:OUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
#0026r PC83-159
~' ~
::..
,:::
';t'%'~
~`+.'~'
/ BEGINNING AT
A POINT ON A THE WESTERLY LINE OF HARBOR
BOULF.CARD
FORMERLY
,o
'
~ ,
SPAilRA RQAD, AS SAID ROAD EXISTING APRIL
z9r 1929, DISTANT 712.00 FEET NORT
,~ HERLY OF THE INTERSECTION
WITH THE CENTERLINE OP ROMNEY?~
i? .j DRIV~; TH~;TCE WESTERLY 150.00
FEET PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LSNE
OF SAID LO°_' 6; THENCE
R
F
R
I
HARBOR
BOU EVARD;
T ENCE
EASTERLY
150SOOD
T T
NE
F E
PpRpLLEL
WITH
SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 6 TO SAID
WESTERLY LINE OF HARBOR
BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTHERLY 50
00
.
FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY
LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
z:!:
' EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 8
FINAL
;
~;~; IN THE
ORDER OF CONDEMNATZON RECORDED AUGUST 4~ 1958, IN BOOK
4371, PAGE 185
OFFI
r _~ ,
CIAL RECORDS.
:i~,`,I
r SAID LAND IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE AREA SHOWN ON A
:~
1,. MAP FILED IN
BOOK 1~, PAGE 24 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS
IN TH
;
;
i; : ,
E OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
„, PARCEL 4:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF MILES RANCHO, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAF RECORDED IN
BOOK 4, PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SPADRA ROAD AS SAID
ROAD FXISTF.D ON APRIL 29, 1929, 552 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE
INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF SPADRA ROAD WITH THE CENTER
LINE OF ROMNEYA DRIVE; THENCE WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID LOT SIX, 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO THE
WEST LINE OF SPADRA ROAD 110.00 FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO
THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT SIX, 150,00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
110.00 FEET; THENCE EAST PARpLLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT SIX, 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 110.00 PEET TO THE YOINT OF
BEGSNNING.
PARCEL 5:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 6 OF MILES RANCHO~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHF.IM~
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 4~ PAGE 7 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN OFFICE OF T$E COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT O[G THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT~ DISTANT
712.00 FEET, MEASURED ALONG SAID EAST LINE~ FROM ITS
INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT~ (SAID EAST AND
SOUTH LOT LINES BEING CONSTRUED TO BE THE CENTER LINE OF
ADJOINING ROADS AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP); THENCE WESTERLY ON A
LINE PAI2ALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT~ 180.OU FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING W~STERLY ALONG
SAID LAST MENTIONED LINE PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLGL WITH THE EAST LINE OF
SAID LOT, 210.OU FEET; THENCE EAST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH
LINE OF SAID LOT, 100.00 F~ET; THENCE NORTH PAF,ALLEL WITH THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LOr~ 210 EEET TO TAE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
-2-
PCS3-154
L
.-., r'.."•.
WHEREAS, the City Planning ~ommission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 22, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate anu make findings and recommendation~ in connection
therewith; said public hearing having been continued to khe Planning
Commission meeting of Septembe~ 7, 1983 and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiqation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
e~idence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by A~aheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050.160 to
wit: to permit a 3-story, 120-room hotel.
2. That the proposed use is hereby granted subject to the deletion
of the three (3)-foot wide walkway easement proposed along the northerly
property line on Revision No. 1 of Exhibit No. 1 on the basis that the Police
Department and Tra£fic Engineer recommended against the proposed walkway
because of the potential danger to pedestrians walking along the easement and
crossing Harbor Boulevard at mid-block.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
4. That th? size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
genera]. welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. T.hat the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and hi.ghways desiqned and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
7. That 9 persons indicated their p*esence at the August 22, 1983
public hearing in opposition and no one indicated their presence at the
September 7, 1983 public hearin9 in opposition; and that no correspondence was
received in opposition to the subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commiss.ion has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
CG (Commercial, General) and RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Family) Zones to the
CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone to permit a 3-story, 120-room motel on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.48 acres,
having a frontage cf approximately 230 feet on the west side of Harbor
Boulevard, approximately 550 feet north of the centerline of Romneya Drive,
and futther described as 1251 North Hazbor Boulevard; and does hereby approve
-3- nC83-154
the Negatiae Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety
and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this Condikional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion
of Reclassification No. 83-84-2, now pending.
Z. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate water
assessment fees shall be paid to the City of Araheim, in an amount as
determined by the Office of the Utilities General Manager.
3• That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to tl~e City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for new commercial buildings.
4• That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at the terminus of
Raleigh Street as required by the City Engineer.
5• That drainage of subject property shall be ~:sposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
6• That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall
be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Fire Department.
7• That trash ~torage areas shall be provided in accordance with
approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
Division.
8. That a 6-foot high masonry bl~ck wall shall be constructed along the
south and west property lines adjacent to the residential zoning.
9. That any proposed parking area lighting fixtures shall be
down-lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet. Said lighting
fixtures shall be directed away Erom adjacent property lines to
protect the residential integrity of the area.
lU. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City cf Anaheim marked
Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3; provided, how~ver, that
kitchen eificiency units may be installed in no more than twenty-five
percent (258) of the motel units, with a maximum of 6-cubic fook
refrigerators, two-burner stoves excludin9 oven and baking
facilities, and single compartment sinks, except that the manager's
unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities; and further
providing that the 3-foot wide pedestrian easement along the
northerly property line is not required.
-4-
PC83-154
~ _. , . ~
~
11. That prior to the commencement of the activity authorized under this
resolution, or prior to the time that a building permit is issued, or
within a period of one year from the date of this resolution,
whicliever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4,
above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time
to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance F•i•-h Section
18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. ~
12. That prior to f?nal building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and lU, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine th~.. adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
cortained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day of
September, 1983.
~ r • o_.CAH
C~~I~M^~~ EIM CIPY PLAftNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ ~
SECRETARY ~~~"`~
r ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do he:eb,y certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Com-nission held on
September 7, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY~ HERBST~ KING, LA CLAIRE
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WH~REOF, I have hereunto set my haf.d this 7th day of
September, 1983.
~.~ ~ ~~
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5-
PC83 ~54