PC 83-183,~,,
RESOLUTION NO. PC83-183
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COi9MISSION
'i''iAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEP.MIT N0. 2494 BE GRANTED
wHEREAS, the A.~aheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditianal Use Permit from CHING-CHU KAO LEE, 920 South Beach
Bculevard, Anaheim, C~,lifornia 92804, owner, and WILLIAM WEI I,IN, 920 South
Beach Boulevard, Anat,eim, California 92804, agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
THE WEST 464.20 FEET MEASURED A:.ONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
SOUTY HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 13~ TOWNSHIp 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN RANCHO
LOS COYOTES, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COONTY RECORDER OP
SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING T'c~EREFROM THE SOUTEiERLY 235.52 AND THE: NORTH
329.52 FEET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST 142 FFET THEREOF.
ALSO EXCEPTING THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO 2HE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED AUGUST 23, 1951 IN BOOK 2220~
PAGE 426 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 3, 1983, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said pubiic hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and again~t said proposed conditional use
permit and to investigate and make £indings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study mad^ by itself and in its behalf, and aftez due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.J50.160 to
wit: to permit a 10-unit addition to an axisting 22-unit motel.
2. That the proposed ~~e will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the yrowth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detcimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
~0057r PC83-183
4. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the ~ity of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
6. That no one '_ndicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corcespondence was received in opposition to the
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL :MPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Cit~ Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a 10-unit add~~i ~~ to an
existing 22-unit motel on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land cc :isting of
appcoximately 0.50 acre, having a fronta9e of approximately 95 feet on the
east side of Beach Boulevard, and further described as Q20 South Beach
Boulevard (Travel Inn Motel!; and does hereby approve the Negative DecYaration
upon finding that it has con~idered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public zEView process and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a si.gnificant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Co~nission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of the subi?c~ property in ordet to preserve the safety
and general welfare of tne Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit rios, 1 through 3; provi~e@, however, ~hat kitchen
efficiency units may be installed in no more than twenty-five
percent (258) of the motel units, with a maximum of 6-cubic foot
refrigerators, two-burner stoves excluding oven and baking
facilities, and single compartment sinks, except that the manager's
unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
containad, shall be deemed null and void.
THE EOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me khis 3rd day
of October, 1983.
~~'~ .~/~,~/~~-,~.-.
CHAI MA2~N ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~
I7 4~~i.~ ~ /~d,~lilit-t-~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC83-183
STATE OF CALIEORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeLing of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October
3, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY~ HERBST~ KING
NOES: COMMISSZONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: LA CLAIRE, MC BORNEY
IN WITNESS WHERROE, I have he[euntu set my hand tt~is 3rd day of
October, 1983.
~ ~c~/_ .C . J~~
SECF.ETARY~ A'NAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC83-183