PC 83-2Lf
RESOLUTION NO. PC83-2
A RESOLUTiON OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RF,CLASSIFICATIOt1 NO. 82-83-10 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Recla3sification from RAYMpND M. MASCIEI., ET AL., 1127 West North
Street, Anaheim, California 92801, owners, and GARY DIASCIEL, 420 South Euclid
Stre•et, Anaheim, California 92802, agent of certain real property eituated in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as
follows:
PARCEL 1: THAT 1~ORTION OF LOT 27 of "ANAHEIM EXTEPISION",
AS SHOWN ON A MAP gY WILLIAM HAMEL IN 1868 AND FILED IN TEiE
OFFiCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER O: LOS ANGELES C:O[iNTy,
CALIFORNIA DF,SCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN
THE CENTER LINE OF VERMONT AVENUE DISTANT THEREON 762.09
FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM ITS INTERSECTIONS WITH THE CENTER
LINE OF PALM STRr^.ET, HS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 11
PAGE 44 OF RECORD OF SUR~IEYS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORD OF SURVBYS ZN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
URANGE COUNTY~ (.AI,ZFORNIA; THENC~ SOUTH 14° 26' 00" EAST
ALONG 'LHE EASTERLY LINE OF LAND DESC'RIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF
TITLE NO. 7725 ANll ITS NORTHERLY PROLONGATION A DISTADICE OF
157.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75° 28' 00" i~IEST 40.C0 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 14° 26' 00" WEST 157.00 FEE'F ALONG THE
EASTERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIHED IN CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO.
13,618 AND ITS SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION TO THE CENTEZ LINE OF
SAID VERMONI AVEIdUE; THENCE NORTHERLY 75° 28' UO" EAST
40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF SEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearinq at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 15, 1982 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly qiven as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and :nake findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearinq having been continued to the P:.anning
Commission meeting of January 10, 1983; and
WHEREAS, ~aid Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due considerat.fon of all
evic'ence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
fol'l~winq facts:
1• That the ~etitioner proposes reclassification of subjact
property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) to RM-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) zone.
2• That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property foi
medium density residential land uses.
3• That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/o_. desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
community.
04132
PC-83-2
^ ' ,A.
4• That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly rclate to the zones and their permitted uses localll established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted u~es
generally establislied throughout the community.
5• Rfiat the proposed reclassification of subject propert.y requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circuiation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by tlie intensification of land usc.
6• That one person indicated their pr.esence a~ said public hearing
in opposition; and that no ccrrespondence was received in opposition to
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAZ, IMpACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject pr.operty from
RS-A-43,000 (Residential,/Agricultural) to RM-1200
Multiple-Famil (Residential,
y) to construct a 2-unit apartment complex with waivers of
maximum structural heiy!~t and required screening of parking facilities on a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 4,960 square
feet, havinq a frontage of approximately 40 feet on the south ~ide ~f Vermont
Avenue, and further described as 304 West Vermont Avenue; and does hereby
apprave the Negative Declaration from the requirement to prepare an
environmental impact report on the basis ~hat there would be no significant
individual or cumulative adverse environmental im~~act due to the approval of
this Negative Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan desiqnates the
subject property for medium-density residantial land uses commensurate with
the proposal; that no sensitive environmental irtipacts are involved in the
proposal; that the Initial Study submitted by the petitioner indicates no
significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impacts; and that
the Negative Declaration substantiating the foregoing findings is on file in
the City of Anahoim Planning Dep3rtmcr~t.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that che Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doinq, that Title 18-2oning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described o ert
(Residential/Agricultural) to RM-1200 (Resident al y Multiple Family) Z ne3upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That sidewalks shall be installed along Vermont Avenue as reguircd by
the C1ty Engineer and in accordance with standard ~lans and
specif~cations on file in the office of the City Engineer.
Z• That drainage of aubject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City ~ngineer.
3. That tt,e owner of subject progerty shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid ~t the time the
building permit is issued.
` PC83-2
4• That the owner(s) of ~ubject property shall pay L•o the City o£
Anahei.m a fee, in an amount as determined by tne City Council, for
street lighting along Vermont Avenue.
5• That th? owner(s) of ~ubject property sha.'_1 pay to the City of
Anaheim a fee, in an amount as determined by the City Council, for
tree planting purpose~ along Vermont Avenue.
6. That tr.ash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with
appraved plans on file with the Of£ice of the Exer_utlve Director of
Public Works.
7. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
8- That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay the traffic signal
assessment fee (Ordinance No. 3896), in an amount as determi.ned by
the City Council, fcr each new dwelling unit prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
9• That appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of
Ut~lities General Manager shall be pa'd to the City of Anaheim prior
to the issuance of a building permit.
10. That subje t property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on £ile with the City of Anaheim marked
Revision No. 2 of Exhibit Nos. 1 t;irough 2; provided, however, that a
six-foot high block wall shall be constructed along the easterly
property line from the south property line northerly to a point
located 20 feet from the north property line (the landscaped area).
11. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Conditi.on Nos. 4 and 5, ab~ve-mPntioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall
become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said
conditions are complied with within one year from the datc hereof, or
such further time as the Planr.ing Commission may qrant.
12• That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 6, 7 and 10, above-mentioned, nhall be
complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determi.ne that adoptic~n of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance ~rith each and all af the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared in~alid or unenforce~ible by tt~e final judgement of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
conta3ned, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RCSOLUTION is signe~. and ap?roved by me ;:his lOth day
of January, 1982.
G~
ATTEST: CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY APINING CON@tISSYON
~~ ~ .
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C_TY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC83-2
~~ ,-,
_. ,--.
STATF, OF C1~LIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim C.ity Planning
Commission, do yereby certi£y that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a m!,etinq of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on January
10, 1982, by tha following vote of the nembers tnereof:
AYES: COMMISS20NERS: HOUAS, HUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, KING, LA CI,AIRE,
MC HURNEY
NpES: COMMISSIONERS: NONY;
ABSENT: COMMIgSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i Have hereunto set my hand this lOth day og
January, 1983.
~`~ ~' 7.~~.r.~; .
SECRETARY, ANpHg*M CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4-
PC83-2
~1:.`..,_.,~_~ _