Loading...
PC 83-222RESOLUTI0t7 N0. PC83-222 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY ':~LANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3362 BE GRANTED WHEREA5, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a veri£ied Petition for Variance from SANTIAGO F. RODRIGUEZ, 286 North Paseo Madero, Anaheim, California 92807 and NOONAN CONSTRUCTIOh, 2915 East La Jolla Street, Anaheim, California 92806, ATTN: GENE NOONAN, agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of CaZifornia described as: LOT 40~ OF TRACT N0. 8080~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 343, PAGES 22 AND 23 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 14, 1983, at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and nake findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its ~ehalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offere8 at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the petitioner proposes waivers of the followinq to construct a room addition: SECTION 18.27.062.020 - Maximum lot coverage. (358 maximum permitted; 478 proposed) 2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on the basis thac the petitioner demonstrated that a hardship exists in that there are sgecial circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape, topography, location oz surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; and that strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in identical zoning classification in the vicinity. 3. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstanceu or conditions applicable to the prc~erty involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use i.n the same vicinity and zone. 4. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial ptoperty right possessed by other propecty in the same vicinity and zone~ and denied to the property in question. 5. That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located. #0093r PC83-222 6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition. ENVIRONMENTAL -MPACT EINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is~ therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepaze an EIR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are heceby foun~ to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That plans shall be submitted to the Building Division showing compliance with the minimum standards of the City of Anaheim, including the Uniform Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Aousing, Mechanical and Fire Codes as adopted by the City of Anaheim. The appropriate permits shall be obtained for any necessaty work. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2. 3. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and detecmine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hezeinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any courl of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 14th day of November, 1983. ~i / ~l~~ i" j~~.«/ ~ . CBAIRWOMAN~// HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: / ~e-r%~, ~/ ~`~i1 ~L~-~ . SECRETARY~ ANABEIM I.ITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2- PC83-222 _ ..,,~^ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretacy of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 14, 1983, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, HERBST~ KING~ MC BURNEY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FRY~ LA CLAIRE IN WITNESS WHEREQF, I have ;eteunto set my hand this 14t. day of November, 1983. `~~ ,~ ~~~:. SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3- PC83-222