PC 84-143~,M",ti
HESOLU'1':II;N N0. PC84-1~3
"""^~
A 12ESOLUTION QE' '1'Hf; A[dAHLIM GTTX PLANN:~NG CUMMISSZON
THAT PI~TT'1'IO[V ['UR kLCLT,SSIFICA'1'ION N0. 8~1-85-2 E3e; GRAP~'i'EL~,. UNCOP~DITIONALLY
;`{ WHLREAS, L-he Anah~i.m City Planning Commi,si~n did receive a verified
~ pe~ii:ion for ReclassiLic~tion From VTST~, N~HL 1~LAZA, LTD., AT~i'N: SALVATORS E.
~; ~ GO`r2'USO, 718 East Gdna Place, S aite F', Covina, C;alifornia 97.722, owner ~f
'.ti;. ) cert~ir~ real pr.opcrty sit~~ated in thc Ci ty oE Anaheim, County oF Or~nge, State
a;) uf Ca]iiocnia, d~scrik~ed a~ tollows;
PAI~CEL 1, TN T;iE CITY OF ANAf.~7M, COUN`i'Y OF' ORAI~IC,E, STATE OI'
CALTFORNIA, AS S[~lOWN l1N A MAE~ EILED ZN BOOK 2, PAGE 49 OF
PAR~EI~ MAPS, TI1 THL OFb'Ii:E OL' THE COUNTY RECOk2DGR OF SA.ID
COi)N7'Y .
~ WHEREA~, the City Planning Commissic~n did iiol.d a public hearing at
~ the Civic Center in the Ci.ty of ~naheim on .7uly 9, 1984 at 1:30 p.m., notice
oE sa.id public hzar.ing having !~een duly given as cequirr~d by law and in
1 accordance wi~h th~ provisions oL' the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
~ to hear and consider evidenc~ foc and against ,aid proposed reclassification
~ and to invPStigat~ and make L..ridings and r.ecomn.endations in connection
± therewit.., and
WHEREAS, ;;aid GommissLon, affer due ir,specL•ion, investigatiion and
study maci~ by itself and in i::s behalf, and after due consid~ration of a].1
evidence ancl reporCs off.ered at said hearing, does find and determine the
~o7.lowiny facts:
1. That thE petikioner proposes reclassification of subject
properi:y frans ~he CL-HS(SC) (Cornmercial Limited, Hillside-Scenic Corriclor
Overlay) Ze~ie tv the CL(SC) (Comm~rc~ial, Limited-Scenic Cc~rr~dor Ov~rlay) 'LOne.
2. 'Phat the Anaheim Genezal Flan desianates subject property for
general op;~n space lanc] uses.
3. That ttie pr.oposecl recla~si.fication of subject property is
necessary and/or de~a.rable for the orcierly ac~d proper development of t-he
communi.ty.
4. That th~ proposecl reclasslfication of si.~bjecl- pr~perty doe,
properly rel~tte to the zones and ~heir permitted uses 'o^ally estab7.ished in
close proximi.ty to subject property and to the zones and th~ir permitted uses
generally estab~ished thr.oughoul: L•he commianity.
5. That ttie proposccl rec:lassification of subject property requires
the im~rovcmenk of abutling streets in accordance with the Circul~tion Elen~ent
of the General Plan, due to thP anticipated increase in l•raEPic which will be
gNnerat~ri by tiie intensifi.cation of :land use,
5. That no one inclicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corrc.s~on~ence was received .in opposition to su~iject
pet~ition.
~~ ~, • , ~ ,~:~;Cr
#0270r PC84-143
~~
,,.~.,1
~~~
~N_~~?ONMEN'i'AL Si~IPAC'i' E'TNDING;
Comn,;.,sion has rev.iewed L•he ~'-"-""~--- ~'r~`~~ rh~ Anaheim Cit
CL-1-~S ~ g~ )( Commercial, r~imir.ea,~ H~llisia~-5cen ic uCor • Y ~'1•anning
y sub ject pr.•operty from I_t~e
CL(SC) (Commercia1, LimiEed-Scenic C~rridor Uv~r1~ r.zclor O~~er.lay? 'Lane tU the
high c:ommec•cial complex includin y~ zone to
alcohol and with wa.ivers o~ g~$~mi-en~losed reskaurantrmwit:h on-sale
display surfaces p~rmztted sign copE~~r~ maximum number of
he.i ht ' r~quxred sign placement, maximum ~ '~z~~
g and requireq sita screeninc7 0l~ u irregularl ~ a~~a~ ~aX~mum buildi.ng
c~nsisting oF appro.cima~e]. 2. Y-sl~ap~d
Y ~~~r~s ~~cat.~d at the southwesl pcorner f Nohl
nanch Road ancl Vil.la 12ea1 Drive; and ~o~,~ he
Declarai:ion up~~ ~ii~ding that it re~~' aU~z°v~ th~ Negative
~ogether wxt}, has considered the Nega~iv~ Dec.larati4n
any comments rec~ived during t}~e
furth~r .Einding on the basis of the ini~ial S~u~ ~ublic revi~~
that ~}~pr~ ~rocess and
~S no substantial ~videnae ~hat the y and any cu~~nm~n;.s r~ceived
effect on the tnvi.ronman~. pr.a:jec~ wi11 havc~ a
sigr.ificant
NOW, THE}~Eb'ORG, BE IT ~~ESOL~~ .~
Commission does herPb LG ~hat ttie Anaheim C~it o
unconditionally and b y ~~~~nt Suh~~~~ F'erition X~~anning
Municipal Code L~e ~ y SO daing, that Tit.it fOT ~e~'a~5if.ication
a.iiei;ded to exclude r, 1~-Zoning af thp Anaheim
~~•-HS(SC) (Cornmercial~ i,imited, Hi1l~ide h c?nicVCc+~ ridc~r~ Ov~r.l~
incorporate waid ~raPerty irom the
L: i m i t 2 d- Sceni.c CorridorJOverZa p r o p~,~ t Y into r ~'} Z~ I~ e a n d t u
yJZone. lle r~,(SC! {Commercial,
'rH~ F'OHE~~OING R'r`,SOI~UTION is signed and approvc~C k~
~f July, Za84' , y me this 9th da}•
•' ,.~ ' ! ...--~
. , ~ ~j
~ r,'~ 'n ~ !y~//,_~ / /L.
~ ~ ,~ 'V\ / ~,~j~~iF~/ jf ~' ~
;._~-~ ~T~:~RMAN, ANAHETt9 C ' ~~'-/
PLANNING COMN,ISSION ~
AiTES'I' ;
- ~ ~~ ~ ~ r
S~CRETARY, ANAHEiN( CIT '"-! !,^_~
Y PLANlJ1NG CUMMI~;~ION
STA2'E UF CALZFGRNIA ) ~
Ci)UDI'~'Y Oi OkANGE ) SS .
~r~'Y UF ADJAHEIM )
I~ ~dith L. Harr.is, SecretaX ~
Commission, do hereb y ~£ the Anaheim Cit
ado i.p Y cerrify that the f.oregoing res~lution W~Sy ~'~anning ?
p' _d a~ a meeting o~ the Anaheim City Planniny Commission held anSJua r
19~2, by che foll ~~ and
o~~ng vot~ of ~.he memb~rs thereaf; '
~'Y 9, i
AYES: ;
COMMISu]:ONER~: DC~~~g~ BUSHU,ti , F.~Y~ IiERBST ~
N1C BU~hEY ~ KING, LA CL.~IRE, ,
NOES: COMMZSSZc)NERS: NONE ~
AHS~N'r: COMMTSSIONERS: NONE ~
IN WITNJs~SS h'HER~Op; I Ha~~e her. eunto sct my I7and this
.TUlY~ ~.994. 9th day of
- - _ ~~7C.. ,~ ~ `" •
SECRETARY, ANAHEZM CITY PLANNING-- C~ ISSION
-2-
Pc~4-i43