PC 84-145r~csUt,u'rtoN N~~. ~~ci34-195,
~~g~p~,r~~~~IpN qt? THE TINAHG:[M CI`i'Y PLANNING CUMMISSZON
~I~E~h7.~ PL'i'I'i I.ON f?UP. VT.FtIANCE N0. 3405 E3T~ GKAN'PFD
WH.LREAS, the Anaheim Cit,y Planni.ng Comr,;is: ion clid rzceive a veri.f ied
P~tition f:or Vari~ nce £rar~ M:IC[~AE1a S, S~MMONS & DEF3BiG A• SAMMUNS, 319G Fa~t
R~dc1iEfe Avenu~, Anuheim, California 92806, owners ~f certain real properL-y
5ituated in the Ci~.Y of Anaheim, County of Orang~a, State of Ca1iforni~
described as:
LOT 7 O[~. 'PRAC'.I' S3~19, AS PER MAP RECORDE~ IN BUOkC 245, PAGC~S
94 '1'0 46~ INCLUaIV.E OI' NIISCELLANGOUS MAPS, IN `PFiE ON'FICF OF
'PElE C:~UN`.CY RL"CORDEK OE SA7.D COUNTY.
4.~HERI;AS, thE City Planning Commis~ion di~3 hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in thE City of Anahein- on J i~Pn~,a ~98equired e by plaw~ and~~in
of said ~ublic he~ring haviny becn c]uly y
acc.,:dar~ce witt~ the provisions or thp Anaheim Municipa:l Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and con~ider evidence for and against said pro~osed variance and to
ir~vestigate ancl mak~ findings and r~commFndations in c:onnection therewith; and
WHERL•'AS, said Con~rnission, a~ter due inspection, i~lvestigakion and
study made b~~ itself and in its behalf, and af ~~~Sd fina° and edetermine the
eviclence and reports offered at .,aid hearinq,
following facrs:
1. That the petitioner proposes a waiver oi the fo].lowi;~y ta
construct .a room additian to a single-family r.esidence:
SEGTION 18~27.062.020 - Maximum l.ot coverage_.
' ` (358 permi.tted; h2~ propo~ed)
2. That tk~e above-~nen~foned waiver is hereby yranted an the basis
that there are special ciecum~tances app.licable to the property such as size,
shape, topography, location and surroundinys which do not applY klicatLon
identically zoned property in the same vicinity; and that strict aPP pth~r
of L•he Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by
pcoperties in the identical Lone and classi.ficatic~n in the vicinity and
subject to Interdepartme~-tal Committee recommendations.
3. That there arc exceptional or extraordinar,y circumstances or
c~nditi~ns applicable to the pro~erty inv~lved or L•o the :tnt:ended use ~f the
propert•y that do not ap~ly general2y to thc property or class of use in the
samp vicinity and zone.
9. Z'hat the requested variancf~ is necPssary f°r other ~f r~PertY i~n
and enjayment oF a suost~ntial pro~erty right pos~es~in questi~n.
the same vi.cir~ity and zonc, and der.ied Co the ~roperty
5. 'Phat rhe requ~st?d varxance will not be materially dptri.mental
to the public ~delfare or ir.,jurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity ar,d zone in which r.he propett.y is locatec~.
PC94-1~5
r~OL72r
. .,~
~. '.l'hat no one inr~icaL~~ their prescnce at said public hearin~ in
opposii:ion; znd that no corr~spandence was rec~ivsd in ~pposition to subject
peti~ion.
L'NVIRONh1LNTAL TMPAC'i' FTNI~ING: Tne Pl.anning Director or his
a~athori2ed repre;;ent~~ive ha~ detcrmincd t;:ar. thE~ ~-..
propo~cd pc•oject fa11s
within ~hc clefinitxon a~ ~ategUrical G~emrtion~, Class 5
~~~tP EIH Guiclelines and is, thet:ci:ore, categqricaliy ~~ex mpk n~ omn the
requirE~ment ~o prepar~ an EtR.
NOW, TEI~kEE'GRE, B~ I`1' RESpLVGD that the Anahcam City Planning
Commission doPS hereby granL- st~i~ject Petition ~or Variance, upon the ~ol.lowing
conditi.ons whict~ are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisit~ t~ ~he
prt~posed u,~e of the sub;ect Nrope.rty in r~rc~er to preserve t:he safety a~td
genera.l welf~re oE ~he Ci~iz~ns of the City of Anahei.m:
1• 7.'hac subject pr~perty aha11 be developed ~ubstantially iri .~ccord~nce
with pYans and spe^_if:icati.ons or. file with the C:ity of Anahei.m
m~rked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. That prior to f-inal building and zoning inspec~ions~ Ccndition
No. 1, ab~ve-mentioncd, sha.il be complied ca.zth.
BE IT fURTHER RESOL'VED that the Anahe?.m City Planning Commissiorl
does herc:by Find and determine Lhat adoption of this Resolutlun is expressly
predicated upc~ applicant's complianr_e with each and ali of the conditiony
hereinabove set forth, Shauld any such condition, or any part thereof, b~
declared invali~i ar unNnforc2able k~y the Eina]. judgment of any court of
cumpetent jurisdi.ction, khen this k;esolutiGn, and any approva'ls l~erein
contained, shall be c3eem~d nul.l and vuid.
THE E'OREGOING RESOLU'PION is signec~ and approvnd by me this 9th day
oE ~7uly, 1984.
.. ,~ I ,r ";7 ~ ~' ~ r , ~,~_'! ~ / _.._---•--
`'~?~, ~ ~ i ,<,~ ;y1 ....'~.~~`..~... ~~ I.~i/1.i~...
.y~.f..~.tr~t..~
_ _ _ •~" CHA~~tMAN, ANAHEIM ~C;ITY PLANNIt1G I:OMMIS5TON
ATTEST:
. '' ~' .
SECRETARY, ANAHF,IM CITY PLANNING CQMMISSION
-2- Pc~~l-14~ ~
STATE OE' CALI£~'ORNIA )
COUN7.'Y OI' ORANGG ) ss.
CITY OI' ANAHEIM )
I, L;d.itt~ L. Flarris, Ser.retary o~ the Anah~~im Ciky Planning
C,ommission, do hereby certify that the for~:go:ing resolutinn w~s p~Used and
adopted at a meel-ing of the Anaheim City Pl~nning Commissian h~7.d an July 9,
~.9A2, by the fol2.owing vot•.e of. trae members t:t;ereof:
AYES: COMMTSSIONERS; BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRX, HERBST, KING, LA (;G~Ii2E,
MC BURNEY
NQES : Cp1~4r1ISSIUNERS : NON.~
ABSENT: CQMMISSIQ~lI:F2S: NON~
IN WTTNrSS W';~kEOF, 1 Have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of
,'lul,y, 19a4.
~ ~ ~ y ,.
~~ ^ ~ ~I ,
SECR)s'TARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION
-3-
PC84-145
~~ ~