PC 84-157~~
~~~~
RLSULUTIOIV NQ ^^ pCgq~~-~~
A kL:SO[~UTION ON THE ANAHEIM (.:.1'TY PLANN:CNG COMMISSTON
`rHA`.i' pC`i'IZ'IpN FOR VARIANCf' Nn. 3398 6E GItANTl,p
WHERLAS, t:he Anaheirn Cit~~ P:i anning Commis~ion ~'id
I'et.ition for Variance ~.rom SAID LAHIllGANI, Lq~ AL. x~~~~ive a verified
An~l:eim, Californ:La 92804, owner, and S'1'ERLIhG C' ~332 Amberwick Lane,
Costa Mesrx, c:~lifornia 92G27 C~F~L,,UN, 447 East 1%th Streek,
, agent~ for certai.n rea.l proper.Y.y ,ituated in the
City of Anaheim, Coucity of or:ange, ~tale of Ca.liFor.nia described as:
PARCEI, 1 ;
"'HE NURTH 205 f~FT Q~ 1'H[3 W~ST 1.20 FEE'!' OF THE EAST 221. 33
r~~2' UF THF NOR7'fIEAST QUARTER OF' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF TI~~
NOFtTETWFST ~?~,~,~~'1'~R OC SECTTON T~~ENTX-FOUR, TpWNSHIr` ~pf~~ SOIJ7'H,
RANGE ELEVEN WEST, S.B.B. & M., AS SHOWN ON A MA.P RE(:ORDED IN
13UOK 51, PAGE 7 nF MTSCGLLAN~p~S MAPS, RECORDS 0[~ ORANGB
COJNZ'Y, CAL,I~'URNIA.
PAR~EL 2;
~'~~C~G A: THE NORT.H 205 FEFT OF '.CHL•' FAST 221.32 FEET OF TH~
h'EST 442.65 FEF:T QF THE NORTH~AST Qit,~RT~R ()F TFlE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OE' THE NQRTHWEST QUARiLR p~ SECTION 2
SOOTH, RANGF ? 1 W~Sq~~ ZN THE RANCHO LO;S COYQTES, ~AS S~f OWN ON A
MAP R~CpRAED I~J 1300K ~1~ paGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
kECORDS UP ~)RANGl~: COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
WHEREAS, the Ci~y Planning Commi.,sion did hold a
the Civic Center in the CiC,y of Ariatieim on Ma 30 Public hearing at
of ,aid pub].;ic hearing having bnen ~ul y ~ 1984 at 1:30 p.m., notice
accordance with the ,~ Y 9iv~n ~s required by 1aw a~r~ {n
provisionti oE th~ An~h~im Munici~al Code. Chap~er 18.03~
to he?r and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to invesLigate and make findin ~
thecewith; said g~ ~n~ re~commendaL•ions in conn~ction
Commi3sion meeting oP AugustP6,~r1984haandg ~~en conti.nued to the Planning
~9:iEREAS, said Comm.ission, aFter due inspection, invPStigatiori and
study made by its~lf ar~d in its behalf, and ai~ter due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does f.ind and determine the
f~llowing ~acts:
1. mhat Lhe petitioner proposes w:~ivers oL•' the f.ollowing to
construct a 35-unit apartment complex;
~~? SEC'1'____ION 1g~34.06:.~.012 - Maximum strucCur.al. h~t.
(1 st_ ocY n~rm.itted w;,thin 150 feet of
sirigle-fan~il}~ r.esidential zoning;
?-StOY. ies pr~~pogPd d~ ia feet )
(b) SE~TION 1~.04.C43.102 - ~daximum .fence hei~lht.
AND 18.34.068_021 i6 fe~t
Ppr,;titted; 7 f~et propo~ed)
#02t~ .4t
PC84-1S7
.r~y ,.nvet\
2. That the above-meril-ioned waivers ace h~~reby granted on the basis
that t.he pet.itioner demonstrated tha~ a hardsh:ip exists in that t4~ere are
special cirrwnstan~.es ap~.~licakJ.e to th~ property such as size, shape,
~opography, 1oc~~ztiun and su~.~rouncling~ which dc~ n~~ apply to other id~ntical.ly
: oned prop~rl:y in Lt~e same vi.ci~ity; and that sl-.rict• application of the ZoKiing
Code ~e~ri~~rs the pr~per~y of privileges enjoye~] Ly other properti~s in the
identicaX zone anc3 clas~ification iri tche vicinil-y and subject ¢o
Interc~epartmenta]. CommittPe recomm~ndations.
3a Thdt there are exceptional or exi:r~ordinary c;ircumstanc~s oi
conditions ap~licable to t:he property inv~lv~d ~r tfl the int~nde~i us~ of the
property thaL- do riot apply generall,y t~o t~~e property or clas~ uf use in the
same viciniky and zone.
4. That i:h~ requesl•ed variance is n~cessary for the preservation
and enjoyment oE a~ubsL-antial property right possessed by other propert;y in
the samP vicinity and zone, and denied ~o tt~e pro~erty in ques~ion.
5. That the request~d variance wi11 nc~t be materially del-riinental
to the puulic welf are or injurious to tr~e property or impravements in such
vica.nify and z~~ne iri which the prop~rty is located.
6. That 6 persons indicat~d their psesence in upposition at the
May 30th public hearing and submitted a petition coni:ai-iing approximately 2~
signakures in opposition; and that 5 persons indicated their presence at the
August 6, 19F34 public h~aring in opposition.
ENVIRdNMENTA.L IMPA~T rINllING: That the Anaheim City Planni~ig
Commission hay reviewed the proposal to rAclassify subjec.t prop~r~y from the
RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) 'Lone to l-he Rt~1-120U (R~sidentiaJ.,
Multiple-Family) Zon~ to constr~ict a 35-uni_k apartment complex with waivers of
maximuir~ strucL•ur.al height and maxi.mum fence heighk on a rectangularly•-shaped
parcel of land consisti~g of approximately 1.18 acres, having a fr4ntage of
~pproximately 341 L-~et on th~ so~.~i:h side of Ball Foad, and further described
as 2910 to 2918 West ~3a11 Road; and does hereby approve the Negati.ve
Declaration upon Finding thaC it has conNidered the Negative Declaration
togetk-er with any r.ommertts received duriny the public revi~w process and
further finding on the basis cf the initial study and an,y comn~en~s received
that ther.e is nu ~~bstantia7. e~~idence that the project w~ll have a significant
effect on the env.tronment.
NOW, THGREEORE, BE IT RF.'SQLVEA that the Anaheim Cit~ Planning
Cotnmission does hereb,y grartt subject Petiti~n for Variance, upon the following
conc3itions which are heceby founc! Lo be a nece:sarx prerequisite t~o the
pro~osed use uf the sub;eck property in urdex tA pr.eserve the safeEy and
ge~eral r~elfare of the Citizens of rhe City ~E Anaheim:
1. That ull enyineering requirements oE the City uf ]~natiafm along Ball
Roaci~ includiny ~re~aration oF improvement plans ailc] i.nst•allation of
all improvements such as cUrbs ancl gutters, sidewalk:;, ~treet grZding
anr~ pavement, sewer ano drainage facilities, or other appurtenant
work sfall be complied ~~~ith as required by fhe City ~;ngineer and in
accorc1ance w~th specifications on file in the OfEtce of the City
Engi-~eer; and thaL security in the ~'orm of a bond, certiEicate oF
-2- PC84-157
. , J~~ ~1..~\
depositr 1eti:er oE rrec]it, or aash, in ari amount and form
satisfactr,~y to th~ Cit.X of Anaheim, ~ha11 be postcd with the City ta
guarantee the sat.is£actc.~ry completion o.ti sai~ improvement5. S3id
secu.rity sha.11 be ~osted with the City prior to approva..l oE
impro~~ement plans, to c~uaranL-ee the installation of the
above-requi.red impr.ovements prior t~ occupa~~cy.
'l.. That pXior to iss~ianc~e of ~ bui.iding permit, appropriate pa~k and
recreation .in-lieu fees sha11 be ~~aid ~o the C~ty ~f An~heim in dn
amount as determined by the City Counci.l.
3. Z'hat prior to issuance oF a buil~ing perm~.l:, the ap~~ropriate traffic
signal assPSSmEnt f~ee sha11 b~: pa:id to t~:e City of Anaheim in ari
am~unt as determinecl by the City Council for ~ach new dwelling unit.
4. TY~at a11 driveways shall be desig~~ed to acc~~~mmodate ~en (10 ) foot
radius curb returns as requir~d by Lhe Cil:y Traft~c Engineer.
5. That drasnage of ~ubject properL-y shall be dis~os<_~ of in a manner
satisi'actnry to the City Engineer.
6. That suk~ject propert~• sha'1 ,e served by und~rgroun~~ utilities.
7. That ~rior to commencen~ent of structural. f.raming, Pire hydrants shall
be installed and aharged as requirEd and deterr,~.n~d to be aec~ssary
by the Chief of the E'ire D~partr~~tnt.
8. That tra,h storaye areas sr-al:l be provided in accordanc~ with
approved plans o-i file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitation
L~ivision.
9. Ttiat ~he owner of subject property sha11 pay co the City af Anaheim a
~ee for tree planting ~urpose~ a1~ng Ba1.1 F2aad in an amount as
determineci by the City rouncil.
10. Thak this Variance is granted subject to t;he completian of
.~eclassification No. 83-84-29, now pending.
11. That street lightiny facilities alony Ball Road shall bz installed as
r~quired by the Utilities General Manager in accordance with
specifications on iile in the OfEice of Utililies Genc~ral Manager,
and that security in the forrn o.f a bond, certificate of deposit,
letter of cr~edit, or cash, in an amouni and form satisfactory to the
City ~~F Anat~e:im, shall be posted with th4 City ta ~uarantee the
satis.factory completion oE the above-mentione~ improvemenks. Gaid
~ecurity shall be posl.ed witli the City of Anaheim prior ta approval
of build,ing p~rrnits. The aUove~required improvements sh~ll be
inscalled pricr to occupancy.
12. That prior to issuance of. a bui.lding permi~, arimary water main fees
shall be paid ~o the Cit~~ of. Anaheim, in an am~unt as determined by
the Office of the Utilities General Manager.
--3- PC84-157
;~a; ~~;r l°.'~ ~'. ~.~-._
13. ~'hat pricr Ga is~uanc~~ oF. bui:lding permil:s, k.he applicant shall
pres~nl- evider;ce sarisfactory to the Chie; E3uil~ing Inspecror t~hat
the r~sidential units will be in coniorm~iRC~ with Noi.se Insulation
Stdndar.cl~ speciEiecl in the Californ:ia Adtninistr~tivc Code, Title 25.
1.4. 'i'hat pri.or ta issuance oF building permits, ~.h~ applicant sha11
pres~nt Fvidence satisfac~ory t.~ the Chief 8uildir~g Inspector ~hat
the propos4d prc.ject a.s in canformance with Council Poli.cy Number 542
"5out~d Attt~nuation in Reszd~rti.al Projer.ts".
15. Thar gat~s sha11 iiot be installed across ~riy driveway or priv:ate
strec~t in a maiiner which may advPrsely a£fECt vehicular traffic in
the adjacent public strePts. Installaticn of any gates within a
di~tance of forty (40) feet from said pul~lic street rights-of-tvay
shall be subject ta the review and aP~raval of khe CiL•y Traffic
Engineer.
16. Tr~at prior to issu~jnce of building r~erm9.ts, an on-site c~~k~icular.
c.irculation plan snaZl be submitted to and approved by the Fi.re
Mar5ha7.1, City ~'raffic Lngineec a;;d the Stree~s and SanitaL•ion
Department.
].7. Z'hat al.l lockable pedestrian and vehicular access gaCes shall be
equippei: wit~ a"nox box" device to the satisFartion of the City rire
Chief and ~he City Chief of Police.
18. That subj~ect property shall be ciev~loped su~;stant.ially i.n accoruance
wi.th plans and ~~eciFications on file with kt:e ~ii:'y of Anaheim marked
Revision No. 1 of ~xhibit i`los, 1 throuqh 6.
.19. That prior to fihe time that a building permit is issued, or within a
p~riod of one year from the clate o~ this reyolution, whichever occurs
first, Conditian Nos. 1~ 2~ 3~ 9~ 10~ 11~ 1?.~ 13~ 1~~ attd 16~
ab~~~r~-mentiuned, ::t~all be cnmplied with. ExtPns~oris For further time
to cumplete said conditions ma,y be granted in accocdance with Section
13,03,U90 of the Anaheim Municipal Coc3e.
2~. That prioc ta final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
4, 5, 6, 8, 17 and 18, above-menta.or,ed, :hall be complied with~
13E IT F(?RTHEt2 kESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning C~minissinn does
hereby find and deteemine that ac~op~ion o.f thia R~solutian is expressZ,y
predic~ted upor. apr].icant's comPliance with each and a11 c,f the c~nditions
hereinabov~ sE~t Forth. Sho~1d any such conclition, or ar.y ~art thexeof, be
decla!:ed invaliu or unenforceab~e :~y the final ~udgment r,L any court of
ccm~etEnt jurisc~iction, then this Resolution, an~3 ariy approvals harein
contained, shall be dEC~r~ed null and vaid.
-4-
PCb4~157
._.,.
'!'HE FOREGUING R~;SULU'i'ION is signec~ and approv~d by m lhis 6th day o~
August, 1984. ;•, ~
~..._
~~~ ~
I ~-.~""`~ ` h ~
% ,
`~ RMA ~ AN;~HETM' C.CY PL NINU COMMIuaION
ATTES7' ;
~ ~v)
_ ` i '~C .~_:C:~~ . 6` - y ~:+C/L2rc_.dc..
S~CRETARX,, ANAHEIM CI'.~Y PLANNING COMMISSIOI3
5TATE OC CALIFORNIA )
COU~ITY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHETM )
I, Edi~h Le I~arri~, Secretary of the A~~heim City l~lanning
Cnmmis5ionr clo het;eby certify that th~ foreg~ing re~olution was passed and
adopL-ed ar a meeting of ttae Anaheim City P?.anninr, Commission held on Augusr. 6,
1984, b,y the fo.ll.owing vote af the members thereo.E:
AY~~: CQMMIS~IONERS: BOUAS~ FRX~ H~RBST~ KING~ LA CLATRE~
NOFS: COMMISSION~RS: NONE
ABS~;NT: COMMISSIONERS: BJSHORE, MC BURNEX
IN WI~rr~ESS WHEREOF, I have herpunto set my hand this 6th d~,y of
August, 1984. ~
i
, '-, • ~
. ,~
~ - ~ ~-~ ~' ~ 't.~t.c,~..
SECRE`1'ARY, ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNI~G CCMPIZSS:ION
-5-
PC84-157
„_~:.._.... .. >