Loading...
PC 84-192~ ~ ltE50LU'1'i0N N0. {.'C~i~l•-l~'Z ; ; _.___ A RE:SOLI~'.I'lON Of~ '1'Hl3 ANA41Elh: Ci'L'Y. E~L,AN~INC COMMISSION '1'HA'I' Pi:'1'I'1'IUN l~OJt iZECI,ASST1':[CA'I'!UN N0. ~4-~35-7 k3F' GkAN'!'~D petition WHh'..EtEA;;, the Anaheitn Ci ty f-oc Rt:c7.assifir ~~tion f Plannin<~ C'c~m~iission did reyuc~st a ver:fi.ed Anaheim, . o. ce Caunty <~E OC~~f~ge Stake r.tuin CP.cI~ property :;it;~ated ;n th f e City af LF'A~.ING ~ COMF~ANY, P. 0. Yox 3"ti3:3, o CaliEorn.i.~, and Crom pp~.IF,[G Cu1v~r Cit C liE LIGHTING certain real pt~operL-y, descri.bed as y, a orni~~ 902.30, f.cllow,~: owner. of PARc:GL 5 AS ~F3UItiN ()iJ ,~1 MAP I2f;CORDiC :[N IiUOK $4, PAGES ~ `I'EiKUUGH $ OF' PARCF.I, MAP£i~ ItJ `i'HE O6'irICL t~E TiIE COUNTX RLCUI~llER. Wri~'RL•'AS, the ~.ity P.lanning Cammi.ssion did hold a~~ublic l~earing at lhe t;ivic CentEr in the City a£ Anaheim on Se~te~nber I7, 1984 a~ 1•30 notice of sai.d pub.lic heariny havi.nc~ been dul ~ p~~~` y giver~ as require~ by iaw and in ac~ordancE with tl:e provisions oE the Anaheim Munici~~al Code. ^ha~ter 18.03, to tcear and consid~r t?Vld@flCe Lor and against saici ProPosed recl~ssifi~ation anr,J to investiyate anr~ tnak~ findings and recommendations in conn~ction therewi;:ti; ancl WHEREAS~ said Commission, after ~aue inspncti~n, investigakion and sludy made by itself. and in it:; behalf, anr~ after due consideration of all evic.ence and reports offere~9 at ;;aiu hearing, cioes find and determine the foli~wing facts: 1• T:~at- the petitioner propos~s reclassification of subject propErty from the M.L(SC) (Industrxal, Limited-5cenic Corridor. Uverlay) Zone t~o th~ CL(5C) (coirunerciai, Limited-Scr:nic Corrider Overlay) Zone. :.'. Thar. the Anaheim General Pla~ ~iesignate:: sub~jec~. property for geneza]. commercial land uses~ 3• That the proposed recla:~sification hf subjer.t praperty i~ nece~sary and/or desirable Cor the a!;]erly and pruper development oE the coR,munity. 4. That the proposed rec.lassifirat.ion ot subject property does properly rel.ate to tt~e zones and r_heir permitted uses 1oca1?y e~tabli~hed in cl~~se pruximity to subject property and to ti~e r,one:~ and tt~eir ~ermitted ~>e; denerally established through~ut thca comn:uniry. 5. That t.he proposeci r.c~~.lassificarion ~E subject property require~ the impcovemen;: cf abutting streets in a~c.ordancF• t-i~h the C~rculation El~ment ot the Genet'al Plan, duc: to the articipaLecl increa,~~ in traffic whicn will be yen~rat~d by the inten:;zEir.ution oE .l~~nd usn. f• 7.'hat nc, one indicaCe~ thaic p~eser~r.e at :s~~id public heariny in oFpo;ziti.on; ancl that nc~ corres~ondenc,~ was received in oFpo~iEion to subject ~cetikion. ENVTHUNML•'N~iAL IN;PAC~t F'IhUIMG: ~i'h<~t ~h~~ Anah-~im City Planning Commi~;sivn ha.~ reviewed the ~~roposal ~.~ CnLl~; ~;lf f ;ubjr~~;t proper.ty fram the MI.(S~;) (Industrial, Limit«,d-ScF~nir_ ~_orridor. Uv~~rlay) 'Lone t.u the c:L(SC) (Commercia., Lim.it!~d-Sc~n.ic C~r.ridor Overlay) Znnc~ ori can irreyula~ly-~ha~ed 6031`~r FC84-192 ~arce.l of land c~n~ist.ing oi ~;ppr.oxim~~t:ely U.93 acre located at: the ~outhwesl: cc.~r~ier ut La i~a.lm~~ Av~nue r~nd Tmperial Hiyhway, and £urL-hcr describecl as 5650 EasL• La Pa.ima Avenue; ~nd doc~s h~reby a~prc~ve the N~~gativ~ Ueclaration uE~on findiny that it has c~~ns.idered the Neg~kiv~~ Declar.aki.~n togethec with any c~mments receive~l duri.ny the publir. review pror;ess and turthex f.inding on the basis ot the initia.l. study and any comm~nts received that there is no subst.~nr_ial tvid~~nce that the project w~ll. h4ve a significant efEFCt on the ~nvirournent. NUW, `.i'HrKEFOIlL, BE i'1' RLSOLVED l.hat. the Anahei.m City Pl~nnir~q Commis,ion does hereby grar~t subject PeLition Eor Reclassification unconditionally and, by so doin~~, thGt_ `l'it].e 18-Zoninq oE th~ Anaheim Municipal c:ode be amendecl ta exclude thc~ above-dPSCribed proper~.y fr.om the ML(SC) (industrial, Limited-Srenic Corridor Overlay) Gon~ and to incorp~rate said descr~bed prop~rty into the CL~(SC) (Commercial, LiRiiked-Scenlc Car..ricior Overlay) Zone. THL I'OREGOING RLSOLUTION i~ siyned. and a~~rc~v~~d, by me this 17t.h day of September, 1984. ;'~ ~ j / , . ~ , C_-l. `,7._-~r ~ _~ .~L-'~% Jti~.L / ~ ~ CHAIF~tAN~, AtJAEI IE M CI~i'Y PI.,,~~iJNTNG 'COMMISSION AZ"~EST : /) . ~ ~t,~-C_-~'~`, ~~Q~C~..~., _ __ SE:CFETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA CUUNTX UF OI2ANG~ ) ;, s . CITY UF ANAHEIM ) J, Edith L. Harris~ aeccetary of the An~ahei;n Cit.y Planning Commission, d~ t~ereby cectiEy that the Loregoing r.esolutic,n was p~ssed and ad~~ted at a meeti.ng of the Anaheim C.ity P1ann.ing Commission held on S~ptember 17, 1984, by th~ fcl.lowing vote of the members tP~ereof: AYES: COMMISSIUNEl25: [3CUA;i, B(.lSFfORE~ FRY~ H!~;RE3ST, KING, LA CLAIRE~ MC Bf)RNEY N~ES: CC)MMTSSIONERS: NONF AE`~~.':r•~: ~,UMMISS.IONEI2S: NUNE IN WI`i'N~SS WEIEREUE', I Eiav~ herEUnto ~et my h~and this 1%th day of Sept:e~^~^r, 1984. ~ , _ , y~ ~~.-C"~~' '~ '`~~.~ SGCFtGTA~Y, ANAFiEiM CIT`l PLANNING CnMMISSION -~- I~~34-1~2