PC 84-197~
:`" ~
~~I
i
RESOL,UTION N~. PC84-197
-
` I A R~SOLUTIUN OP' TE~E ?1NRElElM CI'1'X PI.,ANNIN~ COMMISSION
' 2'HAT PETIZ'ION E'Gf< CONllI'PIONAL USE PLRMI'I' N0. 2621 E~E GRAN'!'ED, IN PA.RT
WHEREAS, lhe Anaheim City Planning Cammission ~id recei~~e a verifiec7
~ Petition lor ~onda.tional Use Perm.il. from WOOD BRIDGE ~~TI,LAGE, LTt), 50 Sout
h
;; Anaheim Boulevard, P.O. Box 348, Ana.heim, Califori7ia ,
9'?F3Q5, owner o .
f certai:~
; redl property situated in che City~ of Ai~aheirn, County oi Crange, State of
;;;~ California, descr.ibed as:
PARCEL 1, IN 'i'ElE CITY OF ANAHL.IM, COUN'1'Y OL' ORANGE, S~'A'tE OE'
CALIE'ORNIA, AS SEIOWN ON PARCEL MAP N0. 81-252 FILED 'IN IIf;OK 174
.PAG~:S 4J. AIVD 4"l UF PARC:E;L MAPS~ IN 7H~ OFFICE Or THE CnUNTY
RF'CURI)~R UF SAID COUNTY.
W.HEREAS, Lt~e City Plar~ning Commissiori clzd hold a public he3ring at.
the Civic CEnter in thc City a.f Anaheim on September 17, 1984, at 1:30 a.m,,
nol•ice oi said p~~blic hearin~ haviny been duly given as rec3uired by l~w and .in
acccrdarice with the provisions of the 7~na.heim Municipa.l Code, Chapter 18.p3,
~_o hear and consider evidence .Eor and against said proposed conditional use
pern;it and to i.nvestigate ar:d ~~ake Eindings an~ recornmendations in connect~.ot1
therewith; said public hearing having k,een continued to ~he PJ.anciin7
Commission meeting of Ockober 1, 1984; and
Wii~REAS, said C'onunission, after due insp~r.tion, inves~ iqation ~nd
study made by itself and in its behalf, and aFker du~ c.o~isidet.~ation of. a11
evidence ~nd report ~ offered at :;aid hearing, does fi~nd and iletermj.ne t~he
follnwing J'act:~:
1. That the proposed use is pr~perly one for which a con~.itional.
use per.mit is authorized by Ar.aheim Municipal Code Sections 18.06.08n~
18.44.OSU.U10 an:i 1F3.~4.050.300 to wit: to pernlit on-sale alcoh~~ic bever.agPs
ita a prop~sed ~emi-enclused restaurant wi~:F~ wraiv~r.~ of. the followiny:
la) SF~.;CTION;; 10.06.U50.0212, - Mi.nimum number. of parkinq spaces.
_1.8.06.050.022, (189 s ~ces cequ.ired; 1a0 spac~;s
18.U5.050.0~31 proposed) ~
AND 18.44.p66.050
1. '.~hat the requested waiv~r is her~by deniecl orl thp basis that
subjECt praperty is located in tl~e cjOwRtOWCl redevelopment acea wheze
apF>ropriate parking spaces are avai.la~le and that approval wauld set an
undesarable precc~dent in said ~r~:~a.
3. Th~t the praposed use wi.ll not advccsely afPect the adjoininy
land uses and the yr~wth and dEVelopment of ~h~ «rea in c/hich it i~ vroposed
tn be located.
4. TP~at~ the r;i.ze and shapt of_ ,.he site proposed for L•he use is
adequate to allow the fUll development of ti~~ prc~~.~osed use in a manner not
detrimeiit~l to the qar.ticula~ area nor tu the peace, health, safety and
generai welfare of the Citizens of the City oF Anaheim.
~U32yr
PC84-197
~~
,ao~.
5. That the grantin~~ of the Canditional Use Permit under the
conditions impusedY i~ any, will nor_ b~ ~letrimental tn the peacp, h~alth,
safety and general welf.~re of t:he Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the l:r.af.f.ic generat~c~ by the proposec9 use wa.11 not impose
an undue burden upan t41e streets and highways designeci and improved to car.ry
tt~e tr.affa.c in the area.
? '1'hal-. no one '_ndicated th,eir presence at said ~~uusition~ to ~ the
oppo~ition, and that na c:orre~pondence was rec:eived zn opp~
subject pekition.
ENVIRONMEN'.~AL IMPACT FINi7ING: ThaL- Lhe Ai7aheim Cit_y Planning
Commission tias reviewed t~he proposal i:o permit ~n-salY alcohola.c beverage~ in
a proposed semi-enclosed resta:irant wi.th waiver. of minimum number of parking
spaces or ar. irregular'ly-shaped parcel of lanc~ consisting oi approximately 1.3
~cres, locatPd at the south~ast r.orner of Lincoln Av~nue and Anah~?.m
Boulevard, and f~:rther described as 50 South Anaheim B~ulevard; and does
tiereby app.rove the Negative Declarati~n upon ~i.nding that it has considered
tYi~ Negative Declaration together with any comments re~eived during the public
review process and ~urtr-~r f inding on th~ basis of the initial stt.idy and any
comments receivPd thak there is no substantia] evid~nce that the project wi11
have ~ significank eFfect on the env:ir~nment.
NOW, TH~HEF~RE- BE IT RESOLVED that the An~-heim City Planning
Commiss~on does heceby grant subje~t Peti~ion for Conditional Use Permit, upon
tY-s rollUwing conditions whic:h are hereby f~una to be a necessary prerequisite
L-o the proposeci use of the subjec.t praperty in arder to preserve the saf.ety
and general welfare of the Citiz~ns of the City of Anaheim:
1. ThaL trash storng fl.lt eWithShthe Streetr~:~!aantenancea a a dSanitati4n
approved plans ~
Division.
2. That all air conditioning facilities shall be proper.ly shiElded from
view, and the sound buffer~d frc~m adjace-zt properties.
3. That the pr~posal shall comply with a1J si.gniny requirements of the
CL Zane, u;~less a variance allowi.n9 S1~]i1 wai~~ers is appr.oveci by the
Plannir~a Commi.ssion or City ~~ounci.l..
4. That~. suUject propert~! shall. be aeveloFed ~ubstantially in accordance
with plans and speca.tic~tions on f:ile witk, the City ~f. Anaheim marked
Exhibit tva~. 1 throu9h 9, provided, however that parking shall be
~r.~viaea on-site and/or o~E-uite as reauirec.~ by Title 1~, Zoning.
5. '~hat prior to l:he ~ommencemerit o~ the activity autho-.ized under this
resolution, or final building and zoning inspecti~ns, whichever
occurs first, Coridition Nos. l, ? and 4, ab~ve-mentioned, shall be
complied with~
gE IT FURTHER RL'SOL•VED that the Anak~eim City Planning Commission does
hersby find and determine that adoption of this Resalution is expressly
predica~ed upon applicant's compli.ance witn each ~nd all. of the conditic+ns
hereinabove se~ forth. Should any such conditions, or atiy part thereo:c, ~e
declared invalid or unenf~tceable by the f.inal judgmenr af ovals ouherein
compete[zt jurisdiction, then this R~~oluti.on, an~] an! PP
cor-tained, sha31 be deemed null ar.d-2oid. YC84-197
THL FORGGOING R. ~`PIC)N is signed and apFroved .,by me this lst day of
October, 1984~ ~ / ~ ~.
~%~ . ~ ,.
_-~ ~;
i <_._..
- f' .i~;; .`-' ' ~.'~ /`~,~•;i~~-- .
CHAIF2MAN, IANAFIEIM CTT~ PI~AIJNING i.OMMISSIOtd
?1TTEST ;
' _~=_..~ .
SECRF~PA Y, ANAHEIM C:ITY PLANNING CGMMISSION
SZ'P.TF GF CALIE'ORNIA )
COUNTX UF ORANGE ) sS.
CIZ'Y OF AN,A[iEIM )
I, Edith L. H~rris, Secrecary o~ the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify ti~at the forEgoing reso.lution was passed an~
adopted al- a n,eetin~ of ~he Ariaheim City Planning C~mmission held on Qc~aber
1, ~984, by the fullowing vote of l•hn members thereof:
AYES: CvN1MISSIONEkS: DOUASp FRY, H~RBST, Ki~1G, LA (:LAIRG, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONFRS: NUNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BUSHORE
IN WIT[U~,SS WHE:REOF, I Haue hereun~a set my hand this 1st d~y of
OCtober, 1984.
_ ~ ~~~~~~-~-
SECR?;'1'AF,Y, ANAHEIM CI'I'Y PLANNING CO6IMTSSiON
-3-
PC84-197