PC 84-219fr~~\
RGSOLUTION NO. PCB~-21~3
r~.,
A RESOLUT:IUN ~[' THE ANAHEIM CI'I'Y ~~I,ANNING r_OMMTSSION
llENYtNG A RLQL~EST `r0 AM,GiVU THE T,EGAL
AESCI~IP'.PION ANU TO DELETE COND2TION NO. 2 OF
RF;SOLUTIUN IJO, F~C84-1'72 ADUP7'ED IN CONE(:TION WI'rH
CONDIT~ONAL, U~E PEFtN1I'i' N0. 2613
WHrRLAS, L•he petitioner submitted a request for an amendment to the
legal description and de.letion of C~ndition No. 2 contained in Planni.ng
Commission Reaolution No. PC84-172 adopted in connecticn with Cot~ditional Use
Permit No. 2613, whir.h was gr~nted by tt-~ Planning Com;nisNion on August 20,
1989- to permit a semi-enclosed restaurant wxkh on-sale beer and wine on
pr~perty consisting o.f approximately 1.06 acres located on the s~uth slde of
~~ermont Avenue and the east side uf Harbor Boulevard, and further c~escribed a~
406 West Vermont Avenue;
WHEREI~S, the petitioner reguests to amend the lega,t description ~o
pertain orily to the easterly 75-foot wide parcel which does not have Frontage
on Harbor tioulevard; and
WHEREAS, the petikioner requests deletion of the Eallowfng c~ndition
contained in the above-referred to resolution;
"2~ That the owner of subject property shall irrevocably
offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim a strip of
land 5~ feet i.n width Crom the ce-iterline of tt~e street
al~ng Harbor Boulevard for street widening purposes.
WHEREAS, the Ananeim City Planning Comrnission did hold a publi~
hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on October 29, 1984, at
1:30 p.m., natice of said public hearing haviny been duly given as requir~d by
la~v and in accordance with the ptovi.cians of the Anaheim Municigal Code, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposal tn amend the legal
description and conditior~s of approval of Conditiunal Use Permit No. 2613, and
~o investiqate and make f.indings and recommendations in connecti.on therewith;
and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation anc'
study made by itself and in its behelf, and after due con~ideration of all
evidence and re~ort~ of~ered at said hereing, DOES HEREBY E'INA:
1• That no one indicated their pzesence at ~;aid public hearing in
opposition; and that no ~orrespon~ence was received in apposition to the
subject request.
2. That khe Commission could not find justiEication to amend aaid
legal desc.ription and to delete said condition on the basis that t:~e
properties are developed j~intly and combinec3 for tt~e purposes of sharPd
parking and 3hared vehicular acce~s to and £rorn Eiarbor Boulevard and Vcrmont
Street.
Et3VIRONMFNTAL ZMPACT FINDING: That a Negativ~ Declaca~ion was
prevfou~ly approved on August 20, 1984, ,~nd no further acti~n is necessary.
~0351r
PC84-219
i
;
i
~
..; ,_.
•~~•~
"'~_'•
:t .trn
?}'
' y~
':',:tiM1
NOW, TH~REFORE, BG IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City px
C~mmiss.i,on does hereby denX amendment
condi~i.ons remain as a ~f Reso.lut.ion No. PC84-17~ anning
part of l:he resolution and must b~ complied With and the
THE FOFtEGOING RESOLUTION is sign~d and approved b
of Uctober 1984. Y me this 29th day
/~j / L 1~
~.1, j,r ~ /? . i ! 1 . / ~ ~ ~'C. G~~'~+~~.I~
CHAIRWOMAN, PRO Tu[y,pnkE
ANAHFIM CITY PI,ANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
c~ -
i ~•
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY F~ ANNING COMMISSIOPI
STATE QF CALI~'ORNTA )
COUNTY OF ORANG~; ) ~s.
CTTY OF ANAHEIM )
x~ Edith L. Harris, Secr~tary of the
Commission, do hereby certify tt~at ~he tore oin cAnahei,m
ado ted at 9 9 xe,,o] ution ast passed nand
29~p~984 a ~neering of the Anaheim City Planning Gummis~ion held on 0
. by tt~e Eo11o~+ing vote oE the member.s thereof; Gt~ber
AYES : COMI9ISSIODIERS :
NOGS: COMFIISSION~RS; BpUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, KING, LA CLA7RE
ABS.EN'P; NONE
COMMISSIpNERS• hERg~T, MC BURNEY
1~ WIT~~ESS WHEREOF, I have hereu~~to set my hand this 29th da
October 29, 1984.
Y o£
------_~~-~ ~ •
SECRETARY, ANRH ~
FIM (;ITY PLANiVING COMMISSION