PC 84-224,~-~,
TtLSOi,UTION N0. P~84-i24
r•.
A RESOLUTTON OF THE ANA[iETM CI'I'Y' ALANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITIUN FOR VAKTANCE NO. 3434 BE GRANTGD
WI~EREAS, the Anaheim City Planning ~Commission did receive a verified
Petiition f~r Variance from CENTURX AMERICAN CORPORATION, ATTN; ROGER C. HOBBS
AND DAN J. MOORE, 1428 East Chapman Avenue, Orange, California 92666, agents
for certain real praperty situated in the Cily oF Anaheim, County oE Oranr..~~,
S~ate of California described as:
LOT 1 OE~' TRAC'i' N0. 1Q585, AS SHOWN ON P. MAP REC0~2DED IN BOOK
478, PAGES 20, 21 AND 22 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECO't2DS pF
ORANGE COl'JNTY, CALIFORN7A.
WHEREAS, the Cxty Planning Commissi~n did hold a pi~blic hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Uctober 29, 1~84, at 1:3p p.m.,
n~tice of said public hearing having k~een duly yiven as required by law and in
accordance wi~ch the provisions of tt~e Anaheim Municipal Code, Chap~er 18.03,
to hear ~nd consider evicience for and agair~st ~ai.d propr~sed variance and to
i.nveskigate and make fi.ndings and recommenda~.ians in :onnection th~rewith; and
WHFREAS, said Commissicn, after due inspection, investigation and
~tudy made by itself and in its behalf~ and after due consideration of all
evidenc:e and re~or~s of£erpd at ~ai,d hearing, does find and determine the
followi!'lg faCts:
1. That the petiti.oner praposes a waiver of the fol~owing tc~ retain
the di,play of ten (10) temporary flags for a new residential subdivision:
SECTION 18.05.085.050 - Permitted deys ot di~ 1~ av•
(Saturdav~, Sundavs and leqal holidavs
germitted; Seven davs a week,pr~po~ed)
2. That the above-menti,ned waiver is hereby grantcd on tt~e ba:~is
that there are spec:ial circumstanc~~ ~pplicable to the propert-y such as si2;e,
shape, topography, location and surroundings which do not apply to ott~.er
identzcally zoned property i.n the same vicinity; and that sttict application
of the Zoning Cod~ deprives the property of privi].eges enjoyed by other
properties i.n the identical zone an~9 classiEication in the vicinity.
~. Tr~ati there are exceptional Qr. exl:raordinary cir.cumstances or
conditions applicable to the praperty involved or lo fihe int~nded use of the
Ax~Pert~' that do not apply generally to the proper~y or cl.ass of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
~• That the requeste~ variance is necessary for khe pre.ervat,ion
ana enjoyment of a substantial prop~rty right possessed by uther propert,y in
the same vicinity and zone, and denied to Lhe property ir~ question.
5. That the request~d variailr,.e will not be materially detrfinent«1
to the public weltare or injurious to the propertv or improvemPnts in such
v~cinity and 2one in whiah the property is located.
~0356r
PC84-i24
,~
.-~•~.
6. That no one indicated th~ir presence at sas.d public heaxing in
opposition; and tti~t no correspondence was received in a~~p~sition to subject
petition.
ENVIROfdMENTAL ITIPACT FINDING: The P].~nning Director or his
authorized representative has determinEd tha*_ the proposed proiect fal].s
within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 11~ as ciefinzd in the
Skake EIR Guidelines and is, ther~fore, categorical].y exempt from the
requirement to prepare an ET.R.
NOW, THEREFORE, ~;~ IT NESOLVEU that the Anaheim City ~lanning
Commission does her~by yrant subject ~etition tor Variance, upon the fallowing
condi.tion~ which are h~reby found l•o be a nFCessary prerequisite to the
proposed use o£ the subject property in ordPr to preserve the satety and
general welEare of the Citizens of. the City af Anaheim:
1. That subject property ti~hall ~e developad substantiazly in accordan;.e
with plans and specificati.ons on file with the City of. Anaheim marked
Exhibit No. 1; prot~~ded, howevez, that onl,y ten (10) temporary fZags
may be displayed on-site.
2. That this variance, permikting a maximum of ten (i0) temporary f.lags,
is yranted for a term co~erminous with the permit issued pursuant to
Anareim Municipal Code Section 18.05.085 plus any e~;tersions ~f time
which may be approved by the City Council.
3. That Condition No. 1, ab~~e-mentioned, sha11 be c:ompleted within a
period o:E thirty (30) days fr.om the date of this t•asolution.
BE IT FUHTHER RESOI.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hAreby find and determine thak adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predic~ted upo-: applicant's compliance with each and all af the conditions
her~inabove sPt forth. Should any such cor~dition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid ~~c unenforceable by the £inal judgmenk of any court oF
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
cont«ined, sha11 be deemed null and vc,id.
TH~ FUREGOING RES~L'J7.'ION is signed and approved by me thi~ 29th day
uf Octaber 1984.
~y , ~
( ' ,~~y.,r G..G.,.~,~L ~- ~~-~.~
CFiATRWOMAN, PRO TEMPOF.E
ANAHEIM CI'.CY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
,. ~ ~ .
~!~
f~ ~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI'r: PLANNING COMF'.SSION
-2-
PC84-224
~ ~ ;~~~
;
~ ; `~'~i
j,a
P31
f
k
i i
;'~~S ~
~~
1
~.~ ~r~
STATF: OF CALI['OItNIA )
COUNTY OF URANG~ ) 8~•
CITY OF P.NAHEIM )
I, Edith 1~. H~rris, Ser.retacy ~f L•t~e Ar.aheim City Planning
Commission, du hFreby certi~y tt~at the for~sgoing r.esr~luti~n was pa~sed and
~dopte~ at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held ~n Octoqe*
`l9, 1984, by the followiny vr,te of t.he members thereof;
AYES: COMMISST~NE,R.S; E30UAS, CRY~ KING, LA CL~A1R~, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIUNERS: BUSHURE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONER5: EIERAST
IN WITNESa WHEREOE', I have heceurit~ set my hand this 29th day c~f
October 29, 19dA. ~
. • ' .
SECRETARY, ANAf~.EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
l.
;1
-3-
PCdA-224