PC 84-237RESOLUTION NO. p~`23~
--'---__.__ _,,,.,.._
~ R~SOLU'!'ION OF THE ANAHEIM CTT~' P~,~NNING COMMISSTpN
THAT P1;TITIpN FpR VARIANCE N0. :3437 13G GFtANTED
WH~;REAS, the Anaheim Cit
Y Planning Commission did receive
Petition for Varianae from SOUT.H BROOKHURST DEVELOPMENT
Cypress~ California 90630 a ~erified
ASSO;;TATES INSTITUTE an~ EDUCATIONAL DESIGNS ' 6415 Katella Avenue,
agent for certain red~~'~'8 'relegraph Road, Cit~ of Commerce•~ DBA CHAVEZ &
Oranye, Skate of Ca].ifornia~ describeduased ~~ the Cit ' ~alifornia 90040
Y of Anaheim, Count~r of
PAFCEL 1:
THE SOUTH 100 b~EET OF THE N:1RTH 212 FEET OF THE SnUTH ONE-HA
OF THE N(~RTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE NORTI~iEAST ONE-Q~ARTER
THE SCUTHEAST LF
ONk;-QUART~R pF SECTION OF
RP.NGE 10 WESTr IN THE RANCIiO LpS ~8~ TOWNSHIP 4 uOUTH,
ZN BOOK 51, AT PAGE C~Y~TES, AS PER MAP RECORDED
10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MApg, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTy HECORD~;R OF S~,ID COUNTY.
~~I.~ LAND IS SHOWN pN A M1~P FILED
0~' SURVEYS, IN TH~ zN S~OK 24, PAGE 40
COUNTy, OFFICL OF THE COUNTy R~~ORDER~ FECORDS
SATD
PARCEL 2;
THE NORTH 112.U0 b'EET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF THF NORTHEA ^
ONF,-Q~ARTER OF THE NORTkIFAST pN~_
ONE-Q~~T~R OF SECTIUN 1fi, TOWNSHIP 4USOUTEi, RANGE 1~SWETHEAS'r
x'HE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN UN A
PAGE 10 MAP RECORL~EA ST~ rN
r MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS q? IN BOOK 51,
SAIA CO(1NTY,
EXCEPTING THEREFROM 7.'FiE WESTERLY 263.60 FEET.
ALSO EXCGPT~NG Z'HEREFRUM THE EASTERLY 2g],.29 FEET.
WH~REAS, the City Plannin
the Civic Cent~r in the Cit g Commission did h~1r~ a
notice of aaid y ~f Anaheim on November public hearing at
accordance with ~he c hearirig having be~n dul 1`~~ 1984, at 1.;30
Y gi.ven as r~ P.m.,
to hear and consider~evidence$For and against sa' ~ ~u~rpd by 1aw and iR
Anaheim Municipal Cade, Chapter 18.03,
investigate and make findings and :ecommendations in connect•
~ro osed variance and to
ton therewith; and
WHERFAS, said C~mmission
study macle by itself and ' after due inspection
evidence and reports offered at saici,hearin ' il~vestigation and
, and aftet due considezaEion of all
following facts; 9~ does find and d~term.ine the
1• That the petitioner
establish a vocational trainir~g schoo proposes waivers of th~
following to
#0368r
PC84-237
~ ;~:;
i`i~
SECTION 18.06~050~0212 - Minimum number o~ uacl~in G
- ~ races.
18.06.050.0261 (17~ Spaces require~; 137 s~aces existing)
AND 18.44.066.050
2. That the above-mentioned waiver is hereby granted on th~ basis
th~t ~he parking variance will not cause an increase in traffic congestion in
the immediate vicinity nor adversely a~fect any adjoining land uses; and that
the granl-ing a.f the parking variance under th~ conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimc~ntal to the peace, health, saf_ety or general welfare of the
citizens of t1~e City of Anaheim.
3. That no one indicatec3 thPir preser~ce at said public hearing in
opposition; and th~t no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONME_NTAL IMPACT FINDINC.:; That the Anah~im City Planning
Commissian has reviewed the proposal to establish a vacational tzain.ing school
on an irr~gularly-sha~ed pa.rcel of land cunsisting oF approximately ~.67
acres, having a maximum Crontage of approximately 100 feet on trie west side of
Brookhurst StrEet and being .located approximate:ly 445 feet sou~h of the
centerl.ine of Urange Avenue and further ~escribed as 631 South Brookhurst
Street; and does hereby approve the Nega~ive Declaration upon findiny that 1.k
has considered the Negative Declarati.on together wi.th any commen~s received
dtariny thE public review proces~ and ~urther finding on the ba~is of the
initial sL•udy and anv c4mments received t.}~at khe~e is no substantial evidence
that the project will t~a~~e a signi£icant effect on the environn~ent.
r10W~ THEREFOR~, 8E IT RESOL'JED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the followi~g
conditions which are hereby found ~o be a necessary prerequisite to the
~roposed use c~f the ~uuject pr~perty in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citiz~ns of the City of Anaheim:
1. That the owner of. subj~at property shall pay to the Cit,y ~f Anaheim a
fee fr~r street lighting along Brookhurst Street in an amount a~
determined by thE City Council.
2» That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee for tree planting purposes alonr~ Brookhurst Street in an amount
as determined by the City Cc~uncil.
3. That in accordance with the recommendation of the Cit~,y Tr~ffic
Enqineer ~her~ sha11 be a minimum of one (1) hour b~tween the end of
~ny c~asses and the beginning o~ the n~xt classes to prevent the
overlanpir~g of vehicles entering and e~titing the property.
4. That trash stocage ~~reas shall be provided and mainkafned ;.;+
acc~rdance with 3pproved plans on file with ttie Street Maintenance
and Sanitation Division.
-2" PC84-237
. - .n~~
_ ~ ,;w+1&d
r~, ;:;
~ ~ • ~,,'r;
~;,~i
ii
SECTZON 18.06.050.0212 - Minimum number of~arkinQ spaces.
18.OG.050.0261 (_].79 s~~~~s r~quired; 137 spaces existingl
AND 18,44.066.050
2. That the abov~-mentioned waiver is hereb
that the parking variance a,a11 not cause an iiicrease in r affi a c ngestion Sin
t:he immediate vicinity nor. ~clversel y af f e c t a n y a d j oining land uses; and that
t h e g r~n ta.nq of the parking variance under. the conditi.ons :.•~
wil,l not be de~r.imental to the peace, healtt~, saFet or ~~~posed, if any,
citizens of the City of Anaheim. y 9enera]. welfare ot the
3. ~i~hak n~ one indicated their presence at said
opposition; and that no correspond~nce was rec~ived ~n o public t~ea~ing in
petition. Pposition to ~ubject
EtJVIRC~NMENTAL IMFACT ['INAING; That tk~e Anaheim Cit
Commissioil has reviewed the Y Planning
proposal to es~ablish a vocational training school
on an irreg~;lar],y_shaped parcel of land consisting of a
acres, having a ma~imum frantag~ of a PProximately 1.67
Brookhura~ Streek and bein pproximately 100 feet on the west ai~e of
centerZine of Orang~ Avenue andc furtherp described as4~631e Southu$r of the
Street; and does hezeby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding othalt rit
has considered thF Negativ~ Declaration tugether with any comments receiv~d
during the ~.~ublic review pro~ess and further Finding on the basis af the
initia.l study and any comments received that there is no substantial e~~i.dence
that the projQct will have a signiEiaa.nk effect on the e~,vironment.
NOW, '~HEREFOR~, BE IT RESO~,VED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does here.by grant subject Petitian for VariancP, upon the fo17.o~aa,nq
conditions which ar~ hereby found tc be a necessar
pro,posQd use ~f ct~e subject Y prerequisite to t:~e
yeneral welf~re of the Citizens~ afptheyCity oidAnaheim p~eServe the safe~y and
1. That the owner of sub'ect
J property shall. pay to thF City of Anaheim a
fee £~r street lighting a.long Brookhurs•t Stree{; in an am~unt as
determined by the City Council.
~• That the owner of subject p~operty shall
fe~ fur txee plantiri pay ~n the City of Anaheim a
g purpos~s alony Arookhurst Street in an amount
as determined by the City Council.
3• 'rhak in accordance with the recommendation of the City Traffic
Engineer tnere shall be a mic~imum of one (1) haur between the end of
any c].asses and thE beginning of the next classes to preven~ the
overlapping of vehicles entering and exit:ic~g the property.
4• ~'""`Tk~at-..prior L•o the commencement of the ackivity autharize~I- uncler this
reso].uticn, or pzior to issuance of a -~-~~"
p~rtod of one __.bui~.ding"~-permit, or within a
year from .the dai~e..-of~"this re3olution, whichever occurs
fi.rst, Condition N~s. i._ana~ 2, above-mentione:, sha~l be complied
with. Extensions.~for"~further time to complete said. conraitions may be
granted_in._-Q~cordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Ar~aheim Municip_a].
Co~e,. _ ,
,
~ ~ .: 7 ~ . ,
' ' l.
r' ..{~ ,~ ~' c C i.. ~ ~ ~ .~~ ~
~: ._ • ~ - • v~-
-2-
PC84-23~
E~
0
.,
5. Tl~at the proposa), sliall comply with ~~11 signing requtrements of the
CL Zone, unles; a variance allowing sign waivers is a~proved by the
PY~nning Commission or City council.
G. '1'hat any Proposec: parking area lightin~ Lixtur~s shall be
down-lignted with a maxir~um height of 12 Eeet. Said 1i.ghting
Fixtures shall be dizected away from adjacent Froperty ],ines t~
protect the residential integrity of the area.
7. Tha~ subject pcoperty shall be dcveloped substanl.ia.lly in accor~]anae
with plans and speciEications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
8. That prior to the com.mencement o~ tl~e activity authorized un~er thi~
reso.lution, or prior to issuance of a build.~ng permit, or wit.hir~ a
period of one year from the date of this resolut:[or,, t,~hi.chever occurs
first, C~ndition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with. Extensions for turthet time to com~lete said conditions may be
Qranted in accordance with Sectian 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
9. That prioc to the commencement of the activity autho.rize~ urder thi~
resalution, or. firial bui,tding and zoning inspeckions ~~+hichevtr occurs
first, Condition Nos. 4, 4 and 7, above-mentioned, 3ha11 be complied
with.
BE I~~ FURTE?ER ItFSOLVED that the P.naheim City Planning C~mmisaion does
hereby find and determine that adoptfon of t:~is I2esolution is expresaly
predicated upon applicant'~ compliance with each and a11 of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any Euch condition, ur any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the fina.l judgmE-~t of any cc,urt of
competent jurisdi~tion, then this Reso:lution, and anp apprnvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FORr^,GOING RESOLUTION is signed~and ap r ved by ~e this 14th dey
o£ November, 1984. _ ;
_ ~
t. - ;~ ~ !
CHAIRMAN, ANAHE4~S CITY FLANNINC COMMISSION
ATTEST•
, , , -._
' "^ ~ '` ~~- ~ re-~_,
SECRETARY PRO TEMF~ORE
ANAEiEirf CITY PLANN~NC CAMMISSTON
-3-
PC84-237
~...;:,_ ,. ,
4'e.,~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANUE j ss~
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
I, Pamela Starne~, SecreL-ary Pro T~mpore of the Anahe_m City Planniny
Cammission, c:u hereby certify that the foregoing r.esolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission r.eaa or~ November
14, 1984, by tha foZlowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: C~MMISSIC)NERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, Ef2Y, HERBST, KTNG, LA Cr,,AIRE,
MC BURNEY
NGES: COMN,ISSIONERS~ NpNE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS wHFxror, I have hereunto set my hand this l~th day of
Novembex, 1984.
~jJ ~ ~,_.
// ~'-h-r.c-~~C~ ~ -~~, ~~ ~
SECREZ'ARY PRU T~MPORE ~
ANAH~IM CITY FLANNING CUMMISSION
~;.
-~- PcBa-237
~.
~:
~~~