Loading...
PC 84-244^ .~^-., RCSOLUTION NQ. PC$4-244 A RESOLUZ'I(JN vC' TE1H~ ANAHEIM CI`.['Y PLA~INING COMMISSION THAT PETtTION FOR VARIANCE NU. 3442. BE GF2ANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim Ci.ty Plann.ing Commission d.i.d recei.ve a verifxed P~l.i.ti.on for Variance from DONALU M. j1i.leti~ and ALGGNE E. WILEY, 14811 Ho1t Avenue, Tustin, Calitornia 92GSU, owners, and JAMES MOHI,ER, 874 North 6atav:ta Strpet, Grange, Cali.forni.a 92668, agent Eor certa.in re~1 prog~rty situated in ~he City of Anahei.m, Count•y of Ore.nge, State o.f Cali:forn.ia, described as follows: THE WEST 337.52 FEE'J' OF THE SOUTEi 139.00 i EET OF 'PH~ WEST ~NE-HALF OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF UF THE NORTfiWEST QUARTER OF T~~IE NORTH~AS'.C QUA2~TE12 OF SECTION 14, TOF]NSHIP 4 SQUTH, RANGG 11 WF~T, IN TH~ RANCEiO LOS COYOTES, AS SEIOWN ON A MAP THrREOF RE~~URDE;T) IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, R~CURAS OF ORANGE CUUNTY, C:ALIFORNIA. WHEREAS, r,he City Planning Commission did hoid a public haaring at the Civi.c Center zn -~he Cxty of Anahei.m on November 26, 1984, at 1:30 p.m., noti.ce of sa~d publi.c heari.ng havi.ng been c~ul~ ~.iven as required by law an~l i.n accordance wxth the provisions o.t the Anah~:~~n Manici.pa]. Code, Chapter '18.03, to hear and cons:ider evi.dence for and aga.inst said prnposed var.i.ance and to inve~ti.gate and mal,e fincli.ngs and recommendalior,s in connecti.on therewi.th; and WHEFtEAS, said Commi.ssion, after due inspect.iun, inve~tigation and study made by xtself and i.n it~ behalf, and after c7ue consi.deration of all ev3.dence and reports offered at sai.d heari.ng, dues find and determine the following facts: 1. T.hat the petxtionec pzoposes waxvers of the followi.ng to c~nstruct a 24-un.it apartment complex: (a) SECTIDN 18.34.U62.012 - Maximum :tructural hei.ght. (.l stor.y permitte~ wi.thi.n 150 .f.Fet r~f single-fami.ly residential zoni.ng; 2 stories propused at 53 feet) (b) SGCTION 18.34.063.011 - ~ti.nimum :.andscaped setback. (20 foot avexa~,e, 15 foot mini.mum required from Western Avenue; lU to 20 feet proposed) 2. Thati the above-~neritxoned wai.vers are hereby gcanted an the basi.s that there are special ci.rcumstant;Ps app? i.cable to tbe praperty such as c~itie, shape, to~~ography, locak.ion and surr~und5.ngs whi.ch do nat apply t~ other ident.i~cally zoned preperty i.n ~:he same vicinfty; and that stri.ct application uf L•he Zon~ng Code deprives the praperty ~~f pc i.vi.lege~s enjoyed by okher proQerties in the identical 2on~ anct classlFic~tion ~.n the vici.n3.t.y. 3. That there are exceptional. or extraordinar~~ circumstances or condi.tfons applicable t.~ the property involv~:d or k~ the tnl•end~d use of the property that do not apply generally l•a the property or clas~ of• use in the ~ame vicin.i~ty and zone. ~0377r PC84-244 ~~ . 4. 'rtia.t the r~quested var ~ance is necessary for the presQrvati.on ~nd enjoyr~ent oF a substant.ial property right poysessed by other property :in the same vi.ci.ni.ty and zane, ~~nd c~eniec3 ta th~ property in question. 5. lhat the requested variance w:i~~ not l~e materi.ally detri.m~nCa1 to the public welrare or lnjurious to the property or impravements i.n such vici.nity and zone in wh.icli l•he pr.operty is loc:ated. 6. That no one indicated thei.r pres~nce at sa:id publi.c hearzng in opposition; an~ that no cocrGspon,ience was received ~i.n opposi.t;on to subject pek.iti.an. ENVIRQNMENTAL IMPACT FIN^TNG: TYiat khe Anahexm City Planning Commi.ssi~n tias r.evi.ewed the proposa~. to reclassify subject property from the CL (Gommercial, Limitec!) Zone to the RM-1'~00 (Res.i.dential, 6Iult.iple-Family) or a Iess intense zone to construct a 24-~~un.it ap~rtment complex with caaivers of maximum structural height and mxnimum landscaped setback on a rectarigularly-shappd parcel of land consist.ing of approxi.mately 0.89 acce, having a frc>ntage of approximately 134 fee~ on the 4ast szde of Western Avenue and further descri.bed as 13~ Scauth Western Avenue; and cioes hereby approve the Nega~i.ve D~r..laration up~n f~inding tha't ik has cc~nsidered the Negati.ve Dealarat:ion togPther with any cumments recpived duri.ng the public review process and fucthcc find.ing oi~ the basis ~f the init9.a1 study ~nd any comments recei.ved that ther~ is no substGntial evi.dence that the project wili have a significa:~ti effect on the envzro.~ment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE T`i' RE;SOLVED that ttie Anahei.m City Planni.ng Commission does hereby grant subiect Petxti.on for Variance, upon tl~F following condxtions which are hereby found ta be a necessary~ prerpquisite tc the proposed use of th~ subject property in o.r~e.r ko pres~rve the safetx and gene:al welfart of the Ci.tizens of the City o'r AnaY~eim: 1. That the owne.r of subject property sha11 pay to t;~e City of Anaheim a fee f.~r txee plant.i.ny gurpuse~ a.l~rig Western Avenue in an amount as de~ermined b~+ the City Counc:il. ~. That pr.ior to issuance of a buiZding permi.t, ap~ropri.a~e ~ark and recreat.xon i-i-lieu fees shall be paid to the ri.ty of Anahexm in ~n amount as ~etermi.ned by ~.he Cxty Cuuncil. 3. That prior Fo issuance of a build.xny p~tmit, the appropriate traff.ia si.gnal ~sses;mWrik fee shall be paid to the City of Anahei.m tn an amount as de~ermi.ned by the Ci.ty Cauncil £ur each new dwelling unit. ~ 4. That the ex.istS.riy driveway on We3L•ern Avenue shall be renuvQ~ and I replaced with a standard curb, ~utter, si.dewa.Zk and land~ca;?;ng. 5~ That aJl dri.vesoays shall be designed t4 accommodate ten (10) faat radius curl~ retur.ns as required by r.h~ City ~rrdffxc Eng.tneer. 6. That drainage uP gubject pr~perty sha11 b~ disp~sfd uf in a manner sat:sfactory to rhe C.ity Engineer. 7. That ~ubject properhy sh4.11 be served by ~-~dzryround uti.lities. '~- PC89-244 ~11 :'p"~ 8• '.l'hat pri.or to commencemenk ~7f si:ructural fram.ing, f,are hydrants sha11 b~ installed ~nd charged as rerui.red and detPrmi.ned to be necessary by the Ch~.ef uf thc k'a.r~ Depar~ment. y• 2'hat l-rash storage areas sha17. bP accordance wil•h ~oproved ~ pr~~~''Qe~ ~n~ mainta.i.ned :~n plan~ on file ~v~.th khe Screet Ma.intenance and Sanitati.on Divzsion. 10. That gates shall not be i.nstal.Zed acro.~c any dr.iveway in a manner wha.ch may advprsely affect vehicula.r traffi.c .i.n the ad 'acent streets. Installation ~f any gates within a di.sta~ice ~f £ortp~blxc feet f.rorn saicl pu~Z.ic stre~t L'ights_c~f_r;~~y shall be subject yo (the r~viPw and approval o.E the C.it~ Traffi.c Engineer. 11. That a perpetua:l ~asement agreement For emergenay access ~ across the pr~perty xmmediately r~ortt~ oP sub'ect purpose~ submitted ta the Planning Departm~n~ and thera) be ransmi.ttedhto1 kh~ Czty Attorney's Of:F..ice for revi.ew and approval. The approved agreement shal' Lhen be fil~d and recorded i, Orange Cuunty Recorder. Proof of said recordation sha].le then tbe furnished to the Plann.ing Departmen~. agreement, an on-site hammerhead drivewa ma ibeU.installed ~asement f.inal builda.n9 and zoning .inspectzons ~ y Przcr to approval of the Cxty Fire Marshall. ~~~~~~gen~ uPon r.evi.ew and 12. That zn the even~ an emergPncy ~ccess gaLe i.s prov:ided, a"Knox Box" devxce sha11 be installed on sai.d ga~e to trie satisf.act.ion aF the Cxty Chief of Poltce and the C.ity k'i.re Chief. Said gate sha11 be utz.li.zed for emPrgency Aurposes only. 13. That all air conditi.onxng facilit.ies shall be properly shi.eld~d f~om view, and tne sound bu.ffered from adjacent propertxes. 14. ~'hat prior to i.ssuance of buildzn ~ present evi.dence sati.sfactory to L-he ChieFtBu:ild ngaInlpector Sthat the residential units wx11 be i.n conformance wi.th N~ise Insulati.on 8tandards speci.fied .in the Cali.forna,a Aclminzstrati~t~ Cude, ~t'iEle 25. ].5. That prior ko issuance of bui.ldin present evidence sat.isfactor,y to the Chi~f~ 8ui.ld e~gdInspeclor Sthat ~h~ proposed projec:t is xn conformance wxth Council Policy ~]umber 54?. "Sound Attenuat.i~n .in Residenti.al Pro~e~ts°. ].6. That a 6-foot high masonry block wa11 sha11 be constructed and mai.ntained along the northerly anc souther].y property 1i.ne3. 17. 'Phat any prop~sed park.ing area liyht.ing fixtuces sh~l.l be down-li.ghted witEi a maximum he.iqht of 12 feet. Said lighti.ng fixtures sha).1 be ~xrected away from ad~acen~ pro~erty l.tne~ to pcotect the residenti.al .integrity of the area. 18. That thi.s V~riance is gra~ited subject to the complet.~on o~ Reclessi.:ficat.ion No. 84-85-1:i, noW pendi.ng. -3- PC84-2~ 4 Cr I,r ~ . ., ~}~~ ~ ~:~ , --.., 19• That subject property shal]. be developed substantially in accordance with plans and spec.ificata.ons on file w.ith the Ci.t•X of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3. 2U. That prior to issuance of a buildi.n one year from the date of this resolut on, ~whichevert ~ ~~rsr~°d$~f Cond.it.ion Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 14, 15 ~nd 18, above-m~ntion~d, sha17. be complied w.ith. Extensa.ons for further ti.me to c~mplete sa.id candi,tions may be granted in ~ccordance wi,th Section 1.a.1~3.090 of t1~e Anahei.m Munxcxpal Code. 21. .hat pri.or to final buildi.ng and zoning ir~spect.i~ns, Condztion Nos. 4~ 5~ 7, 9, 1Q, 12, 13, 16, 17 and ].9, above-m~nti,oned, shal7. be complied wzth. $I: I'i' D'URTHER RESOLVED that the ~lnaheim C.ity Planning Comm.issi.un does hezcby find and deterna.ne that adoptioa of this Resoluti.on i.~ expressly preclic:ated upon appli.cant's compliance wi.th each and a11 of the cond~ti.ons herea,nabove set fozth. Should any such condi.tion, or any rart thereof, bE declar~d xnvalid or unen~orceab.le bx the final c~mpetenk juri.sdict.ion, then thi.s Resolutzon, nd 9 an~~ ~E any cour~ of contained, shall be deemed n~all and vo.id. 1 approvals herein TIiE; FOP.EGOING s'tESOLUTION is si.gned anci approveci by me this 26th day o~ November, 1984. ` ~, ' ~ ``` i .,.~ , , ~: ~-_._.~,~._ _ : _ ~ ,~ -~ ~ . C~ AII~MAN ~ J.r~ / ~ ATTEST; ~ ANP.HEIM C-~,'TY PLANNING COMMISSION ~~:~k..• oC\`• . SECRETARY, ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSZqN STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY Ob' ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) T, Edxth L. Harri.s, Secretary of rhe Anah::im Ci.ty Planni~g Gomm.issi.on, do hereby cert~fy that the f~regozng resolution was meet~ng of the Anahe.itn City Plann.ing Commi.ss~ton helclponSNo4 mbera26pt1984 t by the following vote of the members thereof: AYE~: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS , Bt~1Sf~(3i2~-, ERY, I~RF3~6~P, KING, LA CLAIRE, ~E-Bf~t:~Ey NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ~ HoN-~ fa~,%~/f.~.rE, f/~ ~.r~s ~", ,rj; ~-,.~~~~'i;~~ Sr~ ABSENT: COMF1iSSI0NE;RS: NONE IN WITNESS WHERF.OF', I have hereunto set my hand thi~ 26th day of No~~ember, i984. - 2~~L i'4~'i~.~ , ~ SECRETA.Y, ANAHEIM CITY PLAriNING COMMISSION -4- PC84-2~! 4