PC 84-42(:~,~.,, '~
~~~°
i~~ y,
I ~ 't?.~
,t~t~ ~
4~~~ 1
i
i
RL;;OLU'i'ION NU._ PCii 1-q7
A:~k;SUC,U'I'ION U1' '1'C~l: ANAtI~;IM C'!'I'Y pI,ANNTDIG ~Oi~1M15SION
T[IA7' PL7'T'I.':[UN ['(ik VAftIAivCF' NO„ 333.1 E1f; Ghr1N'f'ED
WHEREAS, t:he AnahPim City Glanning Comm.is.^,ion di~i receiv~ a veri£ied
Peti,li~n i'or Va~iance from WALTEP, E. CUOK ti~:ATHERiNL; A. COOK, 504~} Elolbrook
sr.reer., Anahei:n, California 9'2807, awners; and CAaEY B. JURADO, 2$21 Whi.hestar
Av~nue, pC, Acia}~eim, Calitor~~ia 9:8U6, Ggent oE certain real properly situated
in the City of Anahe.im, Co~i-1Ly oP ~~r.anqF, Sta~e of Ca:li.forni~ describ~d as:
L~~'1' G4, UF '1'TtACT N(i. 6686, AS L~ER hIAPS 1?ECOFtI)I;L TN POOK 7.51 ~
PAGCS 41 AIVD 42 OE' MI,.~'iCCLLANEOUS MAPS~ TN 'L'HE pFl~jC$ OF TFIL~'
COUN'1'Y RECORDER UF SAiD COUNTY.
WEIGREAS, the ~ik:y Pl~nning Commissi~n did hold a uublic hearing aE
kl~e Civic C:enter in the City of Anaheirn or~ I'ebruary 22, 19~4, at 1:30 p.;n.,
no~ice of s~id public l~earing having be~n du1.y yj,y~n as required by 1aw and in
~~ccordance with the pc~ovisions r~f th~ An~~heim Municipal Code, Chapter 18aQ3,
to }~ear and con:~ic3er evidence for ~nd a~ainst sai~~i prop~sed variance and to
investigate and rnake findings anc~ recommendations ii~ connectio-t therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, atter d~e inspectio~, investigation and
study made by itself .3nd in its b~half, ~nd a£ter due consider.al•ion of a11
evicence and reports offered at sai.d hearing, does find and determine the
followin_y facts:
1• That ti~c pet~it.ion~r pro~~oses a wa.iver of the fol.lowing to
construct a r~um addition:
SE.;;TTON .1E3. ~7.062.02U - Maximum lot cov~_P
( :s5i~ maKZmum pc~rmi~ ted; 43$ ~
proposed,
2. 'rh~t the ai~~ve-mentioned waivers a:e hereby yranted on tL•e
basis tF-at there are sp~cia.1 circumsr.ances ~p~licab.le t~ the property such as
size, ~hape, L•opography, loc~tio-~ or surroundings, which do not apply to nttier
id2ntically zuned propEr.ti.es in the vfcinity; that strick applicarion of tt;e
7,oning Cod~ deprives tt~r_ proper~y of priviley~s enjoyed by ~ther properties in
identical zuning classification in the vicinity.
3. Ttiat ttiere are exccpt~onal or F~xtraor~3inary circurrstance~ or
conditions applicable to tt~e pro~erty invo: v~d or ta the int~~nued u~e of the
pro~er.ty that do no': apply generall.y 4o tt e propert.y c~r class oE use in the
sam~ ~~icinity and ~one.
4• That the requested variance :s nccessaxy for the preservation
and en joyme:~t of a sub~t~r.tial p~operty rig,~+~ pos:,essed by othec ~roperty in
~be same vicinity and zone, and denied to the ~rcpPrty in qu~sii~n.
5. 'Phat the reque:ateci variance ~ill not be materially detrimental ko
Che puhlic welfa-e or injurio~•s ;o the pruperty oc improvements in such
vicinity anr9 7one in :~hich thE ~roperty is lacated.
~• Thak r~o on~~ in~jicated tne f r presenc~ at ~aid public h~aring .tn
oppositfon; ~nd tha[. nu corre:;pondence was received in a~position to subject
petition.
1U166r
PC84-~42
~ ~
L•'NVIRUNMEN`1'AI~ I~1PAC'i' FiNi)INC;: '1'hE~ E~lanning Uirc~ctor or his
~autt-ori :ed r~E~rr~sent:~t.iv~~ ~I~~as c~etermined t.iiat th~ ~ropo~=ed proj~cl f-a:lls
wikhin th~ definit~iori of: C~~t.eg~r.ical ExemFtia~~c, Clas~ 5, as defined in khe
8t~t~ LI}t Guideline~ and is, thereL~oc'~~, caLCyor.ic~~lly exempt from th~
requircment to prc~par~ Gn GIIt.
I~U~J, `i'Fll~RE~?CiltL, [3L I2~ :~H'SOLVL.U that the Ariaheim City Pl~nning
Commassion does her~by granG ~ubject Petitian for Varir~nce, upon the fol.lowing
condition~~ wh+.ch are hereby f:ound ta bc a ne~.essary ~.~rerequisite t.o the
proposed use oL the s~abi~ct pro~erLy in order to preserve ;:he safety and
yeneral welfar~ of lhe~ ~:it.izens oL the City of ~lnaheim:
1. 'Priat subject ~roperry sha11 be develoE~ed sul~stanL•i.ally in accordance
wit.h plans and spec:.ificatio~s on r.ile with the City uf Anahe.im
marked Exhibit No. 1.
2. That prior ;:o final building ar~d zon:ing inspectians, Condition
No. l, ~bovp-rnentioned, sha11 ~e complied witt~.
PE IZ' FURTHER RESOLVE~n thak thc Anah~im City P.lanning Commission
does hereby Ein~ and cietermine th~t acloption of this Re~olutinn is expressly
predi~ated upon applir..an~';~ compliance with ~ach and all of the conditiuns
hereinabove set rorl-h. Should any such c~r~dition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unen~'orce~ble by tt~e fin~1 judgment ~f any court of
compet.ent jurisr7iction, ~hen thi~ Resolution, an~~ a.tiy approvals her~in
contained, shall be d~emed nu11 and void.
1HE FUREGOING RE~OLUT70N is signed and approved by me this 22nd day
of Fefaruary, .19~4. ~,~y ~ ~~
_ '~//~%L~f `~ _'."l ' ~/~lG~~ /.._.
CHAIRWOMAN, Apl G7M CITY PL,P.NNiNG COr!MSSSION
ATTi:ST :
_~ ~ ~•~
S~CkErARY, ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING CUMMISSION
STATE OF CALIf'ORNIA )
CGUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith I.. Hacris, Secretar.y ~~f the Anahei.m City Planning
Commission, do here~y certi.ty that the faregoing r~sclu~ion was pas~ed and
adopted at a meeting of the An~heim Cily Planning Commis;,~on held on February
?.2, 1984, by the to.llowing vo~e of the mE~rnk~er~ ther.ecf :
AYES: CUMMISS'i0NER5: BUUAS, BUSHORE, KING, LA CI,P.IRL, Mc: t~UP.NEY
NOE:i: I:OMMISSIONERS: NONE:
Af3:;E;N'1': COMNiISSIUNEP,S; FFtY, HERE3ST
IN WI'I't~ESS k'HEREOF, I havF~ h~reun~o set my h~~nd r_his 27.nd c~ay oE
February, 1954.
~~~ ~ .
SECl2~TARY, ANAHEIM CZTY F'LANNING COt4MISSION
-2- FC$4-42
: ;;=:~ ;