PC 84-55~-•~
RESOLU'i'TON IVU. I?C$~1-55
A RLaULUx'ION OI' 1HE ANAHr;Ibl CI'.t'Y PLANNING COMMiSSION
THZ1`1' PETI'.CION FOk RECLASSIC'ICA2'TON N0. fi3-$A°•22 EiF: DENIED
WH~R~AS, the Ariaheim City Planning Canmission did r.ec~iv~ a v~rified
petition for Recla:~sificati~n fcom F12ANK MINISSALE AND SARAf•i F. MINTSSALG, ll.l
aouth Mahler Drive, Anaheim, C~lifarnia 92807, owner.s, and EMTL B~NES, 14081
York~a. Tustin, Calitornia 92G8Q, ag~nt oF certain rea.l property situai:ed in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orarige, State o~ Califurnia, desr.rib~c? ~s
Eollows:
PARCEL 1, :
THA7.' POR'rTnN UI' THE SQUTHEAS'I' QUAR`C}..R OE' SECTTON 36, '~'OWNSHTP
3 SOUTH, Ri4NGE 9 WEST, SAIV B~RNARllINC? BASL AND MERIDTAN,
DGSCRIBED AS FU~LOWS;
BEGINNING AT `!'HE SOUTHEAST CURNEI2 UF SAIll SFCTION 36; THENCE
WEST `PO A POINT, 195 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CaRNFR ~F
THA'i' CERTATN PARCLL OF .LANll CONVEYEU TO WILBUFt E. RASE~ AN1)
WIrE BY DF'Ell RECQRDGB tN BCOiC 1230, PAGE 230 OF QFI~'IC:IaL
12ECOHDS; THENCE NOEtTH 26° U1' WEST AI,ONG TFIE SOUTEiIaEST~RLY
LINE OE' ~.['HA~ CERTAIN 2ARCEL ~F Le~ND CONVEYED m0 MICHAEL C.
CiINDGR AND WIFE BY 1)~Ell RECORD~D IN BOOK 1~.~2, PAGE 86 l~F
Ob'FICYAL N.ECO~tDS `i'0 A PO1NT 64,83 ~EET SOUTHi,ASTGRL~' FFtOM A[3
T~JTL•'kSLCTIQN TH~RFOF WITH '!'H ~ SOUTHEAS`.CGRLY LINE OF THE 100
FOOT S'PRIP OF LAND DFSCFtIBCD IN DEET~ TO STATE OF CALIFOItNIA,
REC:ORAGD IN BOOK 6$0, FAGE 165 OF OI'F'ICIAL RECORDS, SAID
i~OZN'1' Br^.,ING ]:N AN ARC OI' A CUR~IE, COIVCAVE SOUTHEASZ'ERLY
HAVING A R1IDIUS OI 8454,00 FEF`P; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALON~
SAID CURVf3, k'ROM A TANGENT BEARIIaG NURTH 46° 29' 11" EAST,
THROUGH AN P,NGLF. Oi 1° 41' S5", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 25f1.63
EEET `PO THE INTERSGCTION THEREOF WI`1'H THE SOUTHWEST~RLY LTNE
OF THAT CERTAIN 6U FOOT S`.I'RIP OF T.F,ND DESCRIBEU TN PAR:~i~L 1
OF DEED TO HENRY F. DEL GIORGIU AND WIFE, RECOR.UED IN BOOK
268"l, PAG~ 364 OF QFF'ICIAL RECO.RDS; TH~NCE SOUTH)sASTERLY
ALONG SATD SOUTHWE~TERLY LINE (iF 2'HE 6U FGUT STRIP CONVEXED
TO DEL GTO1tGI0, 'r0 THE EASTERGY I~INE OF .~',AIU SECTION 36;
THENC~; SOUTEIERLY ALONG SAID E;AS~CEI2LY LINE Or SAID SECTION 36
TU 7.'HE POI:NT OT I3LGINNING.
PARCEL 2
THAx' PORTION OE THL SGU'rHE:AST 1/4 OE SECTION 36, TOW~ISHIP 3
:iOUTH, RANGE 9 WLST, SAN BEI~:IARDINO B,ASE AND MERIDIAN,
ACQUJREA BY THE S`!'ATE OF CALIFORNIA 13Y A DEED RECO.RD^D IN
BOOK 2U i 9~ PAGE 1G0 UI' OFETCIAL~ RECORDS IN THE OFFZCE 0' THE
COUNTY RECOR~ER OF SAID CUUN'TY, BOUNDEll NpRTEiWGS`~ERL BY A
LIVE DESCRIBEU AS FOLLOWS:
#U180r PC84-55
}3~.;GINNING AT A P~INT TN THE SOU'CH LTNC; UF SAID SECTION, SAID
PG:CN`i' EILING uISTANT ALU~1G SOU'.l'H LINL EAS`.L'ERLY, 2y.10 }?E~T
FROM TH~ NOR'.CHEASTERLY TERMINUS OF T'r1AT CFRTAIN COURSE
D~,SCRiBLD AS "NOR~PI-1 44° 07' 42" EAST, 6$G.96 FELT" IN PARCEL
1 Ok' A L1EEn RGC012DGU TP] ~3~UK 1731, PAGC 521 OC~ Ob'b'ICTAL~
RECORDa TN SAID OE'F:[CE; THENCF NORTHGAS`.PP:RLX ]:N A DIRGCT LINE
TO '.CHE SOUTHL[•15TERLY TCRNIINUS OE' iIiAT C~RTA:CN COURSL
DLSCI2IL~Eb AS "~OU'I'H 25° 55' 27" EAST, A I~ISTANCE OF 64.E33
b'E:FT TO 'I'HE 'iNTEP.SGC'i'ION '.CHERGOF WTTH A t:URV~" :IN A AE~n
RECURDED SN BOOK 2?85, PAGk. 482, OE~' OI'~'ICIAL RECQRDS IN SAID
OEI'2CE.
WHFR~AS, thw City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Ceriker in the Cii:X of Anaheim ~n April 2., 1984 at 1:30 p.m. r noti.r.e
of 5aid public heariny having }~een dul,y g.iven as requirEd by law and i.n
accordancE with the provisiuns of the Anahe9.m Municipal Code, Chapt~r .18.03,
to hear and curisider evidenr_e f~r and agai.nst said proposed reclassification
ar~cl to irivPstigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WEIERGAS, said Commis~ion, after du~ inspeci:ion, investigation and
stiidy made by itself and i.n its behalf, and af.t~r due consideration of all
evidence and reporL-s ~fEer~d at saicl heariny, C10P.S fin~ and d~termine l-.he
following facts:
1. That the petil-.ioner propos~:~ r_eclassific~tion ~f subjec~
property from the RS-A-43,000(SC) (Resid~ntial/Agriculture, Sc~nic Corri.dor
Uve~lay) Zone to the CO(SC) (Comrnerc.i.al, Office and Professional Scenic
Corric3or Overlay) Zane.
2. ~i't~aL rhe Anaheim C~nyon l~rea General Plan desiynatcs subject
property f.or hillsid~ esta~~ density residential land uses.
3. That the pr.oposed reclassification ci subjecL- property is nat
necessary no,: desirable for the orderly ancl proper cleveloprnent of the
community,
4. That the proposed reclassificat:ian of sub;jeci: property does not
prop~rly relate to thn 'L0t1@S anu their permitted uses locall.y esi:ablished in
close pro:cimity to subj~c~ property and to the zones anc~ their p~rm~tt~cl uses
gerierall;~ established throughout the community.
5~ 'Phat 15 persons indica~ed their presence aL- ~aid public h~aring
a.i~ opposition; and that petitir,ns conlaining approxima~ely 243 signatuc~es were
received iri opposition L-o subjert petition,
ENVTRONMF.NTAL IMPACT F7NDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewpd the pr.oposal ta r,hanye the curren~ hillside Estate
density residenrial. zoning designation or~ the GenPral Plan to Ccmmercial
ProfPSSional and to reclassi.fy subject proper.ty from the RS-A-43,OOU~SC?
(Residential/Agricultucal, Scenic Corridor Over.lay) Zorie ~o the CO(SC)
(Con-meCC:ial, Off_ce and Professienal, Scenic Corridor Overlay) Zone t~
coristruct two camm~rc~a]. offlce bui.tdir-gs with waiver of mini.mum land~capecl
building setback and maximum t~uilding height on an irregularl,y-shape~ parc:el
~f land cor•sisting of apprexirnately 1.2 acres located at the southwest c~rner
-7.- PC~•4-55
~? ?;.
'- ,' ~,
• of Santa Ana Canyc~n Road and Mohler Drive, and fu'rtiher. d~Ccribc~i ~is :lll S~uth
Mohl~r Drive; and does hereby aporov~ the Negativ~ lleclar.atinn ~.~p~n ~inding
that it has consiciered i:h~ Neqative n~clar~ti.or~ together with any comments
receiv2d duririg thP public review process ancl furth~r Einding ~n Ghe bzsis oF
tne initial stuciy anci any comments received 4:hat tliere :iy no subs~aritial
evidence that the projecl- will ~~ave a significant effecl: on the environr~en~.
NOW, THEREFORE, P.E ].T RE;SO.C,~IED tha~ khe Anaheim City Pl~nning
Commis, ion d~~ea hereb,y deny Petition for Rec.lassification on the basis of the
~~fo,:ementioned findings.
THE L~OFEGOING RESOLUTTON is signed and approved by me lhis 2nd day
of Apzil. 1984.
`_..l lvll .r:' _ n"G~'-rL-~
CHAIHWO ~, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIQN
ATTEST: ~ ~ ~
C~ .[t:..~~~"~-~ ~ ~. , / ~ ,-~ ~~.~,
4
SGCRL`1'ARY, ANAHEIM CTTY ~LANNING COMMTSSrON
STI~'!'E UF CALIEORNIA )
COUN'.PY OF qRANGE ) ss.
CI7'Y OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secr.et;xry of th~ Anah~im City PJ.annin~
Commission, cl~~ hereby eertify that the foregoing re~clu~ion ~aas pzss~d and
ac3opted at a cneeting of i:he Anaheim CiLy PJ.anning Commission he'ld o~1 April 2,
158~}, by th2 fallowing vote of the members thereof:
AY~;S: CUMMIS~IONi~RS: BOUAS, BUS.HO.fiE, FRY, HERBST~ KING, LA CL~ATR~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABS~NT: COMMISSIONFl,2S: M(: IIURNFX
TtV WT`L'N~,SS WHEREUI', T have her~unto set my hand this 2nd d~y of
Aprilr 19~4.
.~~~~;-~`.. ~~ i''~-,~~~'.
~
SECftG'i'ARY, ANAHL•'IM CITY PLANNTNG COMMISSION
-3-
pC84-55
,' ~
~ -, . _.. ........,,.. ,