PC 84-74h[~SOL,U'.C10[~l N0. PCFi4-74
A RLSOI,U'.l'IUN UF `i'E•IE A[dAN~sTM CI'i'Y PLANNING COMhllSSICN
TE•1A7.' !~L`.I'I'I'TUN I.~'OR VEI.RIANCG N~. 3377 BE GPAN`.CED
WHE;RLAS, the AnaYaei.m City Planni[~g Commission did receiv~ a veri~ied
l~etition tor Variance f.rom LOUIS l~VERY, E~i~ AL'., 1232 West La Pa1ma, Anaheim,
Califorriia 928Q1, uwner, ancf KATHY COLL7:NS, 8~3.1 La Palma Aven~te, Buena Park,
Ca.lifor~nia 9UG20, agrnt of r,ert~zn real properl:y situai:ed in L-he City of
Anahea.m, Cour~ty of. Orange, St~~~ of C~lifor.nia describecl as:
LO'P 78, TRAC7.' 1597 AS t2LCORnED :IN EiUOK 59, 1~t~GES 1- 2 qF
MISCELLANEUUS MAFu TN THE O~FIC~ OI' THF CUUN~'Y RECORDER pF'
UF.AN(;E COUNTY, CALI.FURNIA.
WHE~GAS, the Ci~y Plar_ning Commission di.ra hold a public hearing at
the Civic C~nter in the Cil-y oC An~~hei.m on Rpril .16, 19a4, at 1:30 p.m.,
notice o~ ~aid ~ublic hearing having beer~ d;iAy yiv~n ds required by 1aw ~nd in
accotdance with kr,e provisions of the Anaheim Munici.~al Code, Crapter. 1.8.03,
ta h~:ar and cons.idet evideni:e for and againsi: said prcapo~ed variance and to
inves`igai:e and make findings and recomrnendati.~ns .in connection ther.ewith; a,~c~
WHEP.f'AS, sa.id Comtnis:ion, aFter due inspecl-ion, investigatiori and
study macle by itseit and in its l~ehalf, and after due consi.c~eratian of. all
evi~ence anc~ repori:s oFEered aL- said hearing, does L-ind an~~ determine the
fol.lowiny £acts:
1. That thn p~kii:ioner pcopo:;es wa.iv~rs oL the fo~lawinr to
~stablish a two-Iut subdivision:
a) SECTIUN 1~.2b.06_1.01.1. - Minimum l.o~ ar~a,
( 7200 sc.~uare feet rF:quirec;; 6134 and
6465 sc~uare feet proposeal
b) SECTTUN 1~.26.061.020 - Minimum lot ~vidth and fronl•aGe
(70 feet require~; 59 feet S inches and
62 teet G inches propo.~ed) ~
"l. 7~hat the above-mentionpd wai~ers are hereby yrar~~ed on the
basis that there are special circumstances applicable to the pruperty such as
size, shape, topog, ~tiy, location and surroundings which do r.ot apply to o~her
identi.cally zoned p.roperty in the same vicin.ity; a~~cl that strict application
of tlie 3uning Code deprives tt~e properi:y of privileges enjoyed by oi:her
pr.opFrties in f:he idenlical 2onc and cl~ssi£ication in the vi.c~.nity and
subject to Interdepartmental Committ.ee recommendations.
3. 'i'ti.~t: there are eKCeptiorial or e:ctraordiriary circumstances or
condit.ions applicable to the preperty irivolved or to the iaitended use oP tY~e
property that d~~ nat apply yeneral.ly to the pro~erty ~r ~luss ~f use in the
same vicinity ~.d zone.
4. That ttie rcyuested vuriance is nAcessary for tre ~reser~2.tioi
-.id cnjoytnent uf a suk~stant.ial prop~r.ty r.ight po~sessed by other proper'.y in
khe same vici.nit~• a~cf a,on~, :~r.d deniec, tu the pro~~:.~r.ty in question.
0
#020ir PG'84-74
~1~~ ~~:~I~f~% .
1,
~~, M~:..
S. '1'hat the rer{uested vari~~nre wil:~ r~ot be materially detr. imenta.l
to the public weli-are ar injur.ious ~o the pzaperly or improvements in such
vicinii:y and z~ne in which the property is locat~d.
6. That i;ca anc i.nc.lir.ated their presenc~ at said pub.lic htarirlg i~i
o~position; anG that ilo carrespondence was r~ceiv~d in opp~sitl~n to subjpct
petition.
E;~JVTRpNM~N`.~AL IMPAC~i' FINDIi~G: 'Phat Li~e ~n~heir~ C'ity Planning
Commisaion nas reviewed ti~e proposal to est:ablish a L•wo-•1ot suhdivision with
waivprs of minimum lot Grea and minimum loL width and frontage on a
r~ctangularly-shap~d parre). of land consist:ing af. apprp~imately 0.29 acre
located at thc southeas~ corner uf La Pa.lma Av~nue anci Lido Street, and
further describecl as 1232 West I,a Palma Avcnue; and c~oes hereby appr~ve ~he
Neyat.ive ~e::laration upon finding that it t~as considered th~: Negatiue
Declaration t~y~th~r with any commerits recei.ved durirlg th~ p~ablic review
process and further finding ~n t,~e basis of khe inikial study and aaty comme-Zts
rNCei.ved ~hat there is no subsr.ankial e4~idence that the project ~a~11 have a
signific.ank effecL- on the envir~nment.
NUW, THEREFOR~, BE IT RFSOLVEn thal khe Anah~im City Planniny
Co~,~mission does hernby grant subject Petiiti.on foc Var.'iance, upon the following
conditicns which are hereby found t~ be a necessary ~rer~quisite tu the
proposed use af the subjPCt ~roperly in order t~ pre~er.ve tlle safe~y and
yen~ral welfare o:E th~ Citizens of tt7e City of Anc~heim:
1. Tt~at the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of AnaYiEim
a iee for sLreet lightin~ alony La ~a1ma Avenue in an am~unt as
determined by the City Co~ancil.
2. 'rhat street lighl•ing tacili.ties alang I.,ido Street shall bc
installed as requireci by tt,:: Utilities Gener~~l Manager in accorda-lce
wi.th s~eci£ications on iile in i:r~e Off:ice af iltilities General
Manuger, and that secur.ity in the f.urm of a bond, certif.icate of
d~posit, letker oL credit, or cash, in an am~unt and forrn
satisfactory to the City of Ariaheim, sha11 be pasted with the City
to guarantee the satisfactory complPtion of Che abava-menti~ned
impravements. Said ser,urity sha11 be posted with the City of
Anahcim pr.io!: to approval af buildi.ng permits. The above-required
ittiprovemenL-s sha11 be .inst:alled prior L-o occupancy.
3. That the vehicular access rights, eYC.ept at approved access points,
to La Palma Av~nue shali be de~]icated to the Cit,y of. Ar~aheim.
4. ~i'h«t the existi.ng dr.iveway on La Pa1ma Avenue ~ha]1 be removed and
replared with a standcird ru:b, gutter, sidew~J.k ,arid lanclscaQing.
5. That in L•he ever.t subject prapNrty i:~ to be divid~cl for the ~urpose
of s~le, lease, oz f.inancing, a p~lrcel map ta r.ecor4 th~ approved
~~ivision oi subject propecty sha11 be submitted to and approved by
the Ciky o.C Anah~i.m ancl theri be record~d in L-he UEfic~ of the Ora~~ge
County R.e~~c~rcler.
-2- PC84-74
6. That rh:: a~an~r of subject prope~_L-y shall pay to the City oL Anaheim
a f~c for L•ree planting purposc~s along I~a Pa1ma AvPnue and Lido
Stree4 in an amoun~ as determin~d by the City Cauricil..
7. Thal prir~r to issuance of a building permit, the up~ropriale traffic
signal assessment fee shall be pai~i to the Cil•y of Anaheim in an
amount as cleter.mined by th~ Ci.ty Council for each nc~w dtaelling unit.
E3. That the owner of sut~ject property by recorded deed st~all dedicate
`.o thP Ci.ty ot Anaheirn a strip of 1anc1 53 fee:t i.ri widt:h f.rom the
centerline of the st:rEet along La T~alma Av~nue f.or s',.r.eet wi~]ening
purposes.
9e ~rt,ar. draa.nage of subject propert•y sha11 be dispo~~d of in a manner
satisfact~ry L-o the City Erigi.neer.
10. Tl~,at su.bj~ct pro~erty sha11 be served by unde,•ground utilities.
.11e 'i~hat prior to issuance of bui.l~ing permits, i:he applicant shall
present evidence sati,sfactory ~o th~ ChiEf B~aildiny Inspector that
the newly constr~acted ,~esidentia~! units will be in conformanc~ with
Noise Tnsulation Standards specified in the Cali£ornia
Ad:ninistrative Code, Z'itle 25.
.12. 7.~hai: prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant sha.l.l
pr~sent ~videncE satisfactory to the Chief Buildinq Inspec~o~ that
tt~e proposPd projecL• is in con£ormance wi4h Cauncil PoXicy Number
542 "Sound Attenuation in Resi~Fntial Projects".
13. TYiat subject pcoperty shall be d~veloped substantial.ly in accordance
wi~h plans and specifications on file with the City of An~~h2im
marked Exhihit Nos. 1 through 5.
14. That prior to l•he con~mencemei~t oL- the activity authorized under this
resolukion, or pr.ior to the tirne that a building permit i~ issuec1,
or wi.thin a period of one ,Year Erom the date of this rPSOlutiori,
whichevF~r occurs First, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, E~, 7, 8, 11 and
12, above-•mentionecl, shal]. be complied wi.th. Ext~nsion~ for further
tirne to complete s:~id conditions may be granted in accordanre with
Section 18.03.090 of CPi~ Anaheim Municipal Code.
15. That prior to Linal building and zoning inspections, CondiLion Hos.
4, 9~ 10 and 13, above-cnentioned, sha11 be com~lied with.
BE TT FUIlTI~ER RESOLVED tha~ the Anaheim City Planning Comrniss.i.on
does hereby find ar-~1 determi.ne that adoption ef this R~:~olution is ~xpressly
~redicated unon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditior~s
hcrei~tabove :~e~ forth. Shou~~d any :uch c~ndikion, ~r any part thereof, be
declared invalid or un~nforceable by the Eina.l judg;nent o.E any c~urt of
corripet~nt jurisdictior.., th~n this Resolution~ and any approval~ herein
containe:l, shall be dec~,~zd nu~.l and void.
~
i
-3- PC84-74
i"~~
`t'HL f'O.REGOING 1tESOLU'1'ION is ; igned aiid aN~ruved by me thi.s 16th da!~
of April, 19F34.
~f~~- .f' ~~
~~~La~ L~ ~S1 , ~.)l~G-~`.4~..y;...~
CHAIRWOMADI,~ NAHL;IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATZ'ES7' :
~ ~~
----~~~ ~~~._...~ : __,~~~~-~..~U
SECRETARY~ ANpHEIM CTTY PLANNIN~, CaMMISSION
STA7.'E OF CALIFORN TA )
CUUNTY UF ORANGE ) ss.
CT'PY UF ANAHEIDI )
I, Ldith L. Hacr:.s, Secretary of rhe Anaheim City Planning
Commission, u~ h~reby certiEy khat tl~e for~going xesalution was pa~sed anc~
adupted at a m~eiin5 of the Anahei.m City Planning Commission h~ld nn April 16,
19$4, by the follocaing vote oE the membzrs ther~of.:
AYES: COMMISSIOI~GltS: BOUAB~ BUBHORE~ F.RY~ !~~ERBu'1'~ KING~ MC BURNEY
NOES; COMMISSIONERS: NUNE
t1BSEN`P: COMMISSIOPJ~I2S: L,A CLAIFG
IN WTTNESS YJHEREOf~', I have her~untu set nl;~ harid this 16th day of
Apri1, 1984.
~~ ///C r (~.4
"_.---~.~.-~.L:'~ ~~r~ 'G'~ ~7..~c-.G,~
SECRETARY, ANP.H)~IM CITY PLANNING COMMTSSTON
-4- PCE~~-74