Loading...
PC 85-112RESOLUTION NU. PC85-112 A RESULUTION OF TyE ANAHEIM CITY PLAtdNING COMMISSION THAZ PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3481 AE GRANTED 4lHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commis~ion did receive a vecified Petition for Variance fron JESSIE C. California 92805, owner, and GARY MASCZELBO420 ~South EuclidX Str elt, Anaheim, Caiifornia, agent for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Counl•y o~ Orange, State of California described as: LGTS 12 AND 13 OF TRACT NO. 255~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AS , SHU41tJ ON A MAP RECORLED IN BOOK 14, PAGEfS) 25~ OF DIISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OE'FICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF , SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City ~f Anaheim on April 29, 1985, at 1:30 p,m,, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as reguired by law and in accor~ance with the provisions of the Anaheim 6funicipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and hF:EREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invesligation and stud_v made by itselE and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1• That the petitioner proposes a waiver of the following to construct an 8-unit apartment complex: SECTION 18.32.062.012 - Maximum structural heiqht. (1-storv within 150 feet of sinqle familv residential zone permittAd; 2 storfe~ nt ;2 LeeE ,i9-1/2 ft., GS-1/2 ft and 95 ft from sinale- familv residential zonin4 to the north east south and west proposed 2• That the above-mentio~ied waiver is hereby granted on the basis that there are special circumstance~ applicable to the property such as size, shape, topography, location and surroundings whir_h do not apply to other identically zoned pr~perty in the same vicinity; and that strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the identical zone and classification in the vicinity. 3• That the proposed variance is hereby granted subject to the Planning Commission's recommendation to City Council, that in compliance with Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution No. 81R-429, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing and ~uch other procedures as required by law, to consider the c.losure of Cypress Street at its westerly terminus prior to issuance of any building permits for this proposal. 4• That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances pr conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. #OS10r PC85-.112 ~ 5• That the requested varianr_e is necessary Eor the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property ri,qht possessed by other property in the same vici.nity and zone, and denied to the property in question. 6• That the requested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the pcoperty is located. ~• That 9 persons indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposiCion; and thot no correspondence was received in opposition to subject uetition. ENVI~gN1AL IMYACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has rev.iewed 'che proposal to construct an 8-unit apartment complex with waiver of maximum structural height on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.6 acre located at the southeast corner of Cypress Strcet and Coffman Street, and further descFibed as 220 North Coffman Street; and does hereby approve the Negative Declacation upon finding that it has consi~ered the Negative Declaration together with any comments rer.eived duriny the public review pcocess and further finding on the basis oF the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantia2 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. NU4i, THEREFURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pcoposed uae of the subject, propecty in order to preserve the safety and genecal welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. That the owner of subject property shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City oE Anaheim a strip cf Land 30 feet in width from the centerline of the street along Cypress Street and 30 feet in width from Lhe centec~line of the street along Coffman Street for street widening purposes. 2• That the existing curb and gutter shall hr rAs~,~~~ ~r~ ~c~~i~sEructed 'n`~ `-~~~ ~1I Cuyineecing requirements of the City of Anaheim along ~Ypress 5treet and Coff.man Street, including preparation of improvement plans and instaliation of all improvements such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer; ar~d that security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactocy to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the C.ity to guaranl•ee the satisfactory completion o° said impcovements. Said security shall be posted with the City prior to issuance of buildtng Permits, to guarantee the installation oE the above-required improvements prior to occupancy. 3. That ~treet lighting faciiities along Cypress Street shall be instaiiea as reauiced by the Utilities General Manager in accordance with specifications on file in the Office of Utilities General -2- PC85-112 i.........,.r...._.,... _.. _ . _ Manager, and that secucity in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, Letter of credit, or cas)i, in an amoun~ and form satisfactory to ttie City of Anaheim, ahall be poste~ with t.he City to guarantee the satisfactory cornple:tion of the above-mentinned improvements. Said security sh~ll be posted wi.th the City of Anaheim prior ro issuance of building permits. The above-required improvements shall be installed prior ~o occupancy. 4. That the owner of subject pcopecty shall pay to the City of Anaheim a fee for tree planting purposes along Cypres~ Street and Caffman St.-eet in an amount as detecmined by the City Council. 5. That a modified cul-de-sac shall be provided at tt~e easterly terninus of Cypress street as required by the City ~ngineec. 6. Ti~at prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shail be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amo~nt as determined by the City Council. 7. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic signal assessment fee sha12 be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council Eor each new dwelling unit. 8. That the driveway shall be constructed to accommodate ten (10) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Traffic Engineer. 9. That drainage of subjer_t property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engi.neer. i0. That subject oropert_~ shall be aerved by undergtound utilities. 11. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydrants shall te installed and charged as requi.red and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 12. That trash 9tOCrlQP ar~.,s ~ti,37~ ~jn i,,py~-~;~G ar.d ~~~iiitaiued in accordance with approved plans on file with khe Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division. 13. That this Variance is graneed subject to the adoption of the Zoning Ordinance in connection with Reclassification No. 80-81-39, now pending. 14. That a parcel map combini~g the twu (2) existing parcels shall 6e submitted tu the City of Anaheim and then be recorded in the Office of the orange County Recorder. 15. That gates shall not be installed across the dciveway in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates within a distance of forty (40) feec from said public street right-of-way shall be subject to the t°view and appcoval uE the City Traffic Engineer. 16. That all lockable pede~trian vehicular access gates shall be equipped with a•knox box" device to the satisfaction of the Chief oE Police and the City Fire Marshali. '3- PC85-112 17• That prior to final buildiny and zoning inspections, "NO parking for stceet sweeping" signs shall be installed as cequired by the Street Ptaintenance and Sanitation Divisioa and in accordance with specifications on file with sai:J division. 1~• That all air cunditioning faciliries ~hall be properly shielded from view, and the sound buf.fered from adjacent residential properties. 19• That a 6-foot hi9h ma~onry block wall shall be constcucted ar.d maintained alon9 the easterly property line. Z~• That ~ubject proper*y shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and cpecifi~ations on Eile with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 khrough 3. li• T'hat prior to issuance of a building per~it, or within a period of one year from the date uf this resolutioi;, whicl:ever occurs first, Condic.ion Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 13 and 14, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. E;ctensions Eor further time to complete said conditi~~ns may be granted i.i~ accordance with Sectioa 18.U3.090 of the Anah,=im Municipal Code. ZZ• That p~ior to tinal building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 5. 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20, above-me~tioned, shall be compl:ied with. [S. That in compliance with Condition No. 15 of City Council Resolution t~o. 81R-42?, gtanting Reclas~ification No. 80-81-39, that prio[ to t:ie introducticn of an ordinance rezor.ing subject property or prior to issuance of any building permits, which ever occurs first, the City Council shall conduct a publir },Paring and ::uch other procedures as recuired by law, to consider the closare of Cypress StreEt at its west~~rly tecminus. ~~~ IT FURTfIER Rl.SOi.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby Eind and detetmine that adonr.ion of «h.~ P,c~o2utl~n lb expressiy ~=~~i~~~v~ u~.~n applicant's ccmpliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove sct forth. S::ould any such condition, or any part th~reof, he declared invalid or unenforceable by th2 final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Reso:ution, and any approvals hPrein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appr ved by me this 29th day of. April, 1985. ` ~ / / J i / ATTEST; CHAIRMAN~ ANAH i. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _ ~11-~ 1° .~/ ~~, . SECRbTARY, ANAHEIFI CITY PLANNSNG COMMISSION -~- PC85-112 '~::.: ; STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEI[•1 ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planr.ing Commissi.on, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on April 29, 1985, by the followiny vote of the members ther~of: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY~ HERBST, KING, LA CLAIRE MC BURNEY NOES: COb161I.^iSI0NER5: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNE£S WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 29th day of April, 1985. ~ ~ n/„ - ~6ti1/L~~a- SECRETARY, ANAHEIM C7mY PLANNING COD1tdISSION _5_ PC85-112 ,,. ;! . ~ ,.. 'i~;: ~ S .M . . ... ' ... ~ u~ ~.._~~....a:n~n ~.~,. -._~. ... ,....._ .... . ~ n.w. ~ -, ... _ _ .. ..._ , , : ._.~ ~.~:w