PC 85-123RESOLUTION h7U. PC85-123
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHCIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS~ON
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIUNAL USE PL•'R6fIT N0. 267b SE GRANTED~ IN PART
W[iEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Ca:mission did receive a vetified
Petition for Conditienal Use Permit from TA TSUt] LIN AND HEH-NIANG JAN LTN,
7777 Beach Bou.levard, Buena Park, California 90620 owners, and JOHN F. SWINT,
7U7 West North Street, Anat~eim, California 92805, agent for certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
THE SUUTH 10.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 7$4.46 FEET OF THE WEST
40.00 FcET OF THE EAST 210.00 FEET OF THR NORTHEAST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 4 SOI!TH~
RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 11 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL 2:
THAT PORTIUN UF THE EAST fiALF QF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF TH$
SOUTHEAST QUAFTER QF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIp 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11
WEST, IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SHOWN ON A MnP RECORDED
It7 DOOK 51, YAGE 11 OAF b1ISCELLANE0U5 D1RPS~ RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE NORTHERiY
679,46 FEET OF SAID EAST HALF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINtJING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SASD
E.4ur HALF NITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY 679.46
FEET; LHENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO A LINE
PARALLEL WITH hND DISTANT NORTHERLY 113.00 FF,F.T MgrSUPED h;
RiGrii' NNVLES b'1tUF1 THE NOkTHERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED AS
PARCEL 1 IN A DEED RECORDED ON MARCH 1~J, 1950 IN BOOK 1983~
PAGE 28 OF OF:ICSAL RECORDS OF SAID ORA~IGE COUNTY; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LZNE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND
DISTANT EAErERLY 279,50 FEET MEASURED AT RI6HT ANGLES FROM
SAID WESTERLY LINE, BEING THE TFUE POINT OF BEC'INNING; THENCE
NORTHERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LZNE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH
AND DISTANT SOUTHERLY 95.00 FEET MEASURED AT RZGHT ANGLES
FR014 THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHERLY 679.46 FEET; THENCE
EASTERLY ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND
DISTANT WESTERLY 2I0.00 FEET 6fEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM
THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE TO A LZNE THAT IS PARALLEL WZTH AND DISTANT
SOUTHERLX 105.00 FEET MEASURED AT kIGHT ANGLES FROM THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTBERLY 679.46 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY
)1LJNG SAID PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND
DISTANT WESTEFLY 40.00 FEET MEASURED AT RIGH'P ANGLES FROM THE
EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID
PARALLEL LINE TO A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL 41ITH AND DISTAN'l
NORTk1ERLY 113.00 FEET DIEASURED AT RIGHT A~IGLES FROM TH5
NORTHERLY LZNE OF SAID LAND OF KOSS: THENCE WESTE1tLY ALONG
SAID PARALLEL :,INE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
#0522r
PC85-123
WHEREAS, the City ?lanning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 15, 1985 at 1:30 p.m., notice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.C3,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed ceclassificat'on
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing having been continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of May 13, 1985; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation ar~d
study marie by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts;
1. That the proposed use is propecly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.44.050,:50 to
permit a 71-unit, 3-story motel with waiver of the fo.ilowing:
SECTION 18.44.063.040 - Minimum landscaoed setback.
2. Ttiat the cequested waiver is hereby denied on the basis that
tha petitioner submiLted revised plans deleting said waiver.
3. That the proposed use, as granted, will not adversely affect
the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it
is ptoposed to be located.
4. Tt~at tt~e size and shape ot the site propospd for the use, as
granted, is adequaL-e to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner nnt detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety
and 9eneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permi.t under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and genecal welfare of the Citizen~ of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the traffic genecated by the proposed use will not impose
an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry
the traffic in the area.
7. That 10 pecsons indicated l-heir presence at the Apcil 15, 1985
meetin9 and 8 persons indicated their presence at th? May 13, 1985 public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IDIPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Plan~ing
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
RS-A-43,000 (Residential, Agricultural) te the CL (COmmercial, Limited) Zone
to permit a 71-unit, 3-story motel on an irregularly-chaped parcel of land
consisting oP approximately 0.92 acre, having a£rontage of approximately 112
feet on the west side of Beach Boulevard, and further described as 705 South
Beach Boulevard; and does hereby apprcve the Negative lleclaration upon finding
that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any com:nents
''` -2- PC85-123
~~
~a~..ti...,-... , ......_. . ... . _ . _ . .. . .. _ . _ , . , . . .. , . . , _ .. .. ... . . . ... . .. .
. ,.~,
received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of
the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial
evidence that the project wi21 have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THER6FORF:, BE IT RESOLVEn that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions wh:.ch ar.e herebp found to be a necessary prerequisite
to the proposed use ef r_he subject property in order to prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in ordec to preserve the safety and
general welface of the Citizer.s of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this Conditional Ose Permit is granted subject to the adoption
~f the zoning Ordinance in connection with Reclassification No.
84-85•-31, now pending.
2. That the owner of subject propercy shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a fee for tree planting purposes along Beach Boulevard ir. an amount
as determined by the City Cauncil.
3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment Eee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for new commercial
buildir~gs.
4. Tliat drainaye ot subjecC properCy shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That subject pcoperty shall be served by underground utilities.
6. That prior to commencement of structural framing, fire hydcants
shall be in~talled and charged as required and determincd to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in
accerda;ice xith aYp_•oved ~-~Z=n~ en fil~_ ~.ith t!:^ Street Plair.Lenance
and Sanitation Division.
8. That sidewalks shall be installed along Beach Boulevard as required
by the City Engineec and in accorclance with standerd plans and
specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer.
9. That all aic conditioning facilities and other roof and ground
mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the
sound buffered from adjacent residential properties.
10. That tt~e proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of tne
CL ~one, unless a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
11. That a 6-foot high masonry block wall shall be constructed and
maintained along the north and west property lines.
12. That any propo~ed parking area lighti~~a fixtuces shall be
down-li9hted with a maximum height oF 12 fe?t. Said lighting
fixtures shall be directed away from adjacent property lines to
protect the residential integrity of the area.
-3- PC85-123
~ ~ ... . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . ~: , '-'3
1~• That 15-gallon or .larger trees planted on 2U-foot centers, with
eppropriate irrigation facilitiec, shall be p~anted and maintained
along the north and west property lines.
19• That subject proFerty shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications en file with the Cit.y of Anaheim
macked Revision No. 1 uf Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5; provided,
however, that kitchen efficiency units may be installed in no more
than twenty-five percent (258) of the motel units, with a maximum of
6-cubic fout refrigerators, two-burner stoves excluding over. and
baking Eacilities, and single compartment sinks, except that the
manager's unit will be allowed to have full kitchen facilities.
15, That all guestroom windows, balconies and stairways facing the north
and west property lines shall be fully screened to eliminate all
visual intrusion into L-he adjacent residential condominium complex.
5aid screening ~hall be oemanently maintained.
16. That prior to issuan,:e of a building permit, or. within a period of
one year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with. Extensions Eor further time to complete said conditions may
be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim
!4unicipal Code.
17• Thal prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
complied~with,9~ 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, above-mentioned, shall be
BE IT FURTHER RE&O:.VED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid oc unenforceable by the Fina7 ;~~qi;,ent ot any court of
comoer,o~t j4riauicLiun, chen this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TIiE FOREGOItdG RESOLUTION is signed and ap r~d
of Mav. 14as
ATTEST:
`~~ .~' ~~`
SECRETARY~ ANAilEIh1 CITY PLA2!NTNC COMMI&SION
, p ove, by me this 13th day
-/_' ~ ~) :
~ -: i . .--~ f ~> '~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CI PLA ING CODiNISSION
-4-
PC35-123
,-.
,,~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS,
CITY OF ANAHEIFI )
I, Edith L. Har[is, Secre~ary of F.he Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do t;ereby certify that the L-oregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Plar:ning Commission held on May 13,
1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, YRY, HERBST, KING, LA CLAZRE,
MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNF.SS WHEREOF, I Have hereur.to set my hand this 13th day of
;~ May, 1985.
~~1 _ ~~ ,~ ~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CI:Y PLANNING CUMMISSION
~~
-5-
PC85-123
I~ ~,;,;-, , _