PC 85-144,~,
RESOLUTION N0. PC85-144
A RESOLUTTON OF THE ANA~EIM CI7~~ PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION rOR RECLASSIFICATION NU. 69-85-32 SE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission di.d receive a vecified
petition Eor Reclas~ification from SEVERIANO .J. PEREZ AND RUT~ ANN PEREZ, 3153
West Ball Road, Anaheim, California 92804, owners, and ARTHUR P. L.ANE AND
BEVERLY R. LANE, 3157 and 3163 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California 92804,
owners, and MHGDY HANNA, 4~00 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 680, Newport Beach,
California 92660, agent for certain teal ptoperty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, Szate of California, de~ccibed as fcllows:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST 4UARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 4
SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST~ SAN BERNARDINO h1ERIDIAN, ZN THE CITY OF
A[dAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST 2.5 ACRES OF
THE SOUTH HALF 0': THE SOUTHWEST QUAFTER OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER GF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE
NORTH ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 2.5 ACRESr 330 FEET OF
THE NORT:?F.AST CORNER TNEREOF; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH
LZNE OF THE SOUTH HALP OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SUUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QOARTER OF SAID SECTION~
66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST
2.5 ACRES~ 330 FEET TO A PGINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE
~OUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER GF SAID SECTION;
THENCE WEST ALUNG SAID SOUTH LINE 66 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGZNNSNG.
PARCEL 1:
THE EASTERLY 80.00 FE~ET OF THE WESTERLY 250.00 PEET OF THE
WEST 2.50 ACRES OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SUU'PHY;AS'1' QUARi'GR GF S'aCTiGN 14,
TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WEST IN THE RANCHG LOS COYOTES~
CITY OE ANAHEIM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OP CALIFORNIA~ AS
PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK S1 PAGE 11 OF lfISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTX RECORDER OF SAID COU~ITY.
PARCEL 2:
THE WEST 2.5 ACRES OE' THE SCUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SODTHWFST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION
14~ TOWNSHSP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 11 WEST, IN TF1E RANCHO LOS
COYOTES~ CITY OF ANF.HEIM~ COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS PER RECORDF,D IN BOOK 51 PAGE 8 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN THE OFFICE OF TiiE; COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 250 FEET.
PC85-144
054lr
. :, a
. . . . . . . . . .. ...~:~.' .I.,3..
WH~REAS, the City Planning ~ommission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Centec in the City of Anaheim on April 15, 1982 at 1:30 p.m., r.otice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connectior
therewith; said public hearing having been continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of June 10, 1985; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspecti.on, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of al.l
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
fol.l... ~ing facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property Lrom RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) to the RM-17.00
(Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone.
2• 1'hat the Anaheim General Plan designates subject p:operty for
medium-density residential land uses.
3. That tk~e proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper deve.lopment of the
com:nunity.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and ~heir permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permit.ted uses
generally established throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of a.butting streets in accordance wit!~ the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensification of larid use.
6• That three persons indicated their presence at said public
hearing in opposi.tion; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
ENV1RONt•fiiNTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
RS-A-43,000 (P.esidential/Agricultural) to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Familyj or a less intense zone to construct a 52-unit apartment
complex with waiver of maximum building height on a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.17 acres having a frontage of
approximately 226 feet on the north side of Ball Road, and further described
as 3153, 3157 and 3'.63 West Ball Road; and does hereby approve the lVegative
Declaration upon finding that i~ has considered the Negative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process and
further Linding on the basis of the initial study and any commencs received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment.
+ -Z- PC85-144
~i.
~ '
_ ,,,~
~
h~W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant oubject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude L-he above-described propecty from the RS-A-43,000
(Residential/Ayricultural) and to incorporate said described property into the
RM-1200 (Residentia.l, Multiple-Famiiy) Zone npon the fallowing conditions
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequis=te to the proposed use of
subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the
Citi2ens of the City of AnaY,eim:
1. That the ownee of subject property shall irrevocably offer to dedicate
to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width from the
centerline of the street along Ball Road for stceet widening purposes.
2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball
Road, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of
all improvemer.ts such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water
facilities, streel- grading and pavement, sewer and drainage
facilities, oc other appurtenant work shall be complied with as
required by the Cit,y Engineer and in accordance with specifications on
file in the OfEice of the City Engineer; and that security in the form
ef a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim, shall be posted
with the City to guarantee the satisfactory comp'~tion of said
improvements. Said security shall be posted with the City prior to
introduction of an ordinance rezoning subjecl• property to guar~ntee
the installation of the above-•required improvements prior to occupancy.
3. That street lighti~g facilities along Ball Road shall be instal2ed as
required by the Otilities Genecal Manager in accordance with
specif.ications on file in che Office of Utilities General Manager, and
that security in the Eorm of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of
credit, or cash, in an amount and fcrm satisfactory to the City of
Anaheim, shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory
completion of the above-mentioned improvements. Said security shall
be post~d wirh rhe Ci*_1 of rna!:e_m p~_ior to the izt:oduction of an
ordinance rezoning subject property. Tre above-req~~ired improvements
shall be installad pzior to occupancy.
4. That pri~r to the introouction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights granted by this resolution shall
become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said
conditions are complied M•ith within one year from the date of this
resolution, or such further time as the Planning Commission may grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission doEs
hereb,y find and determine tl!at adoption of *his Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
:~ereinabove set forth. Should any such condikion, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or uneaforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Reso]stion, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
-3- PC85-144
__ ,_~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and a proved by me this lOth day of
June, 1985.
' ~~
% ,~~ ~'
'~---CHAIRP7AN~ ANAiEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ~i~
SECRET Y, ANAHEIt4 CITY PLANNIDIG COhIMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I, Edith Le Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Coinmission, do hereby cectify lhat tha foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on June 10,
1985, by the following vote of the members tnereof:
AYES: COMt•IISSIONERS: BOUAS~ BUSHORE~ FRY, HERBST~ KING, LA CI.AIRE~
MC BURNEY
NOES: CODIMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSZONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Have hereunto set my hand this lOth day of June,
19a5.
~~. ,~.° .,.~~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~' -d- PC85-144
.;..:.,. ;~,..~...~.
44k,.~.. .;:xi . .. ~ . .. . ~ . . , . . . . . . ~ . , . ... ~ i
. . . . . . . . . . _ _ .. '.:rP