PC 85-16RESOLUTION NQ. PC85-16
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHF.ZM CITY PLANNING COMMISSJON
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 3948 BE DENIED
hHERF.AS, the Anaheim City P_anning Commissien did receive a verified
Petition Eor Varianca fro~ AEN fiATHA[v'AY AND MARY LOU HATHAWAY, 1060 West
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California 92802, owners, and GREGORY PYROS, 1327-A
Baker Street, Costa t•1esa, Califocnia 92626, agent for certain real prr~perty
situated in the City of An~heim, County of Oranye, State of California
described as:
THE 41EST 190 FEET OF THE NORTH 210 FEET OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER 0^
SECTION 27, IN TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RAP7CY.0
SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ADIA, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AS PER
MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10, DSISCELLANROUS MAPS, I~ THE
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City plann~.ng Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 7, 1985, at 1:30 p,m,,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as reyuired by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim M.unicipal Code, Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against sa.id proposed variance and to
investiyate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WEIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its betialf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
followi.ng facts:
1. Tl~at th~ petitioner proposes waiver of the following to expand a
restaurant:
SECTIUNS 18.06.050.0232 - Minimum number oF parkinq spaces.
AND ]8.46.05fi,p50 (l,a cpaces re~uired; "s5 spaces existing)
Z. That l:hc above-mentioned waiver is hereb_~ denied on the basis
tt~at the parking var;ance will cause an increase in traffic congestion in the
immediate vicinity and adversely affect any adjoining land uses; and that the
granting of the parking vatiance will be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety or ge;ieral welfare of ~he citizens of the Cil•y of Anaheim.
3. That there are nc exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditionc aDplicable to the pr~perty involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generaily to the property or class of use in the
same vicinity and zone.
4• That the requested variance is not necessary for the
preservation and c:njoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other
property in the same vicinity and zone, and denied to the propezty in question.
5• That the reqi,ested variance will be materially detrimental to
the public welfare or in~urious to the property or improvements i.n such
vicinity and zone in which the propecty is located.
#0413r
PC85-16
~~ . t;,
6• That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was ceceived in opposition to subj~ct
oetition.
ENVIRONFIENTAL I6IPACT FZNllING: That the Anaheim City Pldnning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to expand a restaurant witl~ waiver of
minimum number of narking spaces on a rectangularly-shaped parc2l of land
consisting of approximately 0.5 acres, located at the southeast corner of
Katella Avenue and West Skreet, and further described as 106p We~t Katella
Avenue (Tiffy's Restaurant); and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration
upon the finding that it has considered the Negative Declar.ation together with
ar.y comments received during the public review process and further finding on
the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
enviroument,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE I4~ RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby deny subject Petition for Jariance on the basis of the
aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING P.ESOLOTION is signed and approved by me this 7th day
of January, 19g5.
-_'~. ~-r ~ ~ ~ / ~J ~~~ ~
CE~AIRMAN, ANAHETMICITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~,/~~
SECRETARY, ANANEIM CIT~LA~~ (;pp~t~igSION
STATE GF CALIFORNIA )
CUUy1TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIPI )
I. Edith L. Harrfs, cr~~e`~rl ~C ~r1e Anaheim City Planning
~ommission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planninq Commission he.ld on January
7. 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COM~?zSSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE, FRY, HERBST, LA CLAIF.E, MC BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: KING
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand this 7th day of
January, 1985.
~~ce=L .~`J P~ L~._.
SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNINC COMMISSZON
-Z-
PC85-16