PC 85-170..~-.
RESOLUPION N0. PC85-7.70
A RESOLUTION ON 'PHE ANAE:EIP1 C_TTY PLANN_TNC COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RGCLASSIFICATION N0. 84-85-40 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Rec.lassification from ROGER R. DITTM.T~NN, 1270 East La Palma
Avenue, Anaheim, California 92805, own=r~ and YOLDASH DEVELOPMENT, ATTN:
MOHAI•iMAD RE2AZADEH, 434.1 East c'h~~,i,~cn Avenue, #219, Orange, California 92669,
agent, of certain re~~ i;iupecty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of
Oranye, StatP ci ~aliforni.a, described as fol.lows:
TEIE WESTERLY 56.82 FEET OF THE FOLLOWIN!' ~LSCRIBF,D LAND~ SAID
WEaTERLY 56.02 FEET BEING MFr.;:iitt~l ALONG Tli~ SOUTHEASTERLY
LINE THEREOF:
A?•~ .rtAl' YORTION OP THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJUN DE SANTA ANA,
BEING A PORTION OF LOT ONE OF ANAHEIM EXTENSION~ AS SAID LOT
ONE IS SFIOWN ON A MAP OF SURVEY ?fADE BY WI~LIAM HAMEL AND
ACicNOWLL"DGGll BY ALFRED ROBINSON, TRUSTEE~ ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF :HE CUUNTY RECU1tLE:n OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY~
CALIFORNIA~ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
fih:Git~IJii:C P.4 A PUINT IN THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT; BEING THF.
THE SOUTH LINE OF LA PALMA nVEMUE~ DISTANT THEREON 93.41 FEET
Wi;ST OF THE NORTNEAST CURN~R OF SAID LOT; RUNNING THENCE WEST
AI,ONG TEIB NOkTH LINE OF SAID LOT 161.92 FEET; THENCE
~OUTHERLY PARALLEL~ 4iITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT~
"t79.849 FEET; THENCE NORTH 73° 45' 10" EAST 156 FF.EY TO A
LINE WyICH IS PARAiLEL WITH TFIE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT
THROUGH THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TFIENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID
LAST MENTIONED PARALLEL LINE 234.546 FEET TO THE POTNT OF
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the Cit.y Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
tite Civic i:ente[ iu L'ue Cii.y ~i i+uaLeim on Juiy o~ 29u5 - 1:3C p.m., nutice
of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim blunicipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WtiE;REAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offeced at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from Rhi-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone to R61-3000
(Residential, Ftultiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject propetty for
medium-density residential land uses.
0573r PC85-170
, ,-.
3. That the peoposed [eclassification of subject property to the
RM-3UOU Zone is necessary and/or des.'.rable for the orderly and proper
development oF the community.
4. 'Phat the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close pcoximity to subject property and to the zones and their permik~ed uses
genecally established throughout the community.
5. Thzt one person indicated his presence at said public hearing
in opposition; and that no r.orrespondence was ceceived in ooposition to
subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FZNDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Commission has revizwed the peoposal to ~eclassify subject p~operty from the
xM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Fumily) Zone to the RM-3000 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone to construct a 7-unit affo[dable
condominium complex with waivecs of minimum number of parking spaces, minimum
1ot area pee dwellin9 unit, marimum site coverage, minimum front yard setback
and mini.mum recreational-leisure area on an i~regularly-shaped parcel of land
consistin9 of appcoximately 0.32 acre having a frontage of approximately 60
feet on the south side of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 1262 East
La Palma Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding
that it has considerubl.ichreviewtpeocesslandtfucther9~f ndinglon the basisnof
received during the p
rhe initial study and any commenL•s received that there is no substantial
evidence :hat the project will have a signiL-icant effect on the enviconment.
NUP7, THEREFORE, 86 IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-describad property Prom L-he Rht-1200 iResidential,
Multiple-['amily) zone and to incocpoca*_e said described property intu the
RM-3000 (Residential, Plultiple-Family) zone upon tt~e following conditions
which are hereby found to be a neces~acy p~erequisite to the proposed use of
subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welface of the
Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That an otdinance rezoning subject pcopetty shall in no event become
effective except upon or fo7.lowing the recordation of a final map
within the time specified in Government Code Section 66463.5 or such
further time as the Planniny Commission or City Council may grant.
2. That the owner oP subject property shall submit a letter requesting
tecmination of Conditional Use ?ermit No. 1036 to the Planning
Department.
3. That priot tu the inteoduction of an ordinance cezoning subject
prope[ty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions oc rights granted by this resolution
shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless saio conditions a~e complied with within one year frc+m the
date of this cesolution, or such Eurther time as the Planning
Commission may yrant.
_2_ PC85-170
~-.
BE IT FUR'PHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby f.ind and determine that adoption of this Resclution is expressly
pcedicated upon applicant's compliance with each and a11 of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenEorceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals hecein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
TE]E FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si9ned and app~ oVed by 1me this 8th day
of July, 1985. / ~
~ .:- ,
~~~U_;~ i1 ~.l-t =~L'l11~/'
'-CHAIRMAN~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING CCMMISSION
ATTEST: /J
(O L1~-~ w ~ .
SECRETARY, ANAHEII9 CIT]~PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALZFORNIA )
COUNTY OF OkANGE ) 55.
CITY QF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Hacris, Secceta[y ot Che Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolutiozi was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on July 8,
1985, by the followin9 vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, BUSNORE, ['RY, YERHST~ KIPIG, LA CLAIRE~
F!C BURNEY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: CO[4MISSIONEI25: NONE
ItJ WITNESS WHEREOE', I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of
July, 1985.
~i~l~.~ ~
4ECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS:iTON
-3- PCB.°i-170