PC 85-172RT:SULUTION NO. pC85-172
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZD7G COMMISSZOPJ
THA7' PETITION FUR VARIANCE N0. 3494 BE GRAN;ED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commissicn did receive a
Petition for Variance from ANAHEIb] HiLLS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Avenue verified
~"&"r Anaheim, California 92807, owner, and ~ 6507 Serrano
7U South Lake, Suite 750, Yasadena ~HMIF10 GRANDE
agent for c , California 91101 ~I~LAS, INC.,
ertain real property situated ~ ATTN: JOHN JAMESON,
Orange, State of California described as: in the City of Anaheim
. County of
YROPOSED TRACT N0. 10967, SEZNG A SUBDIVSSION OF~ PqRCEL 1 IN
THE CITY OF A~AHEI61, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
AS PER J~~AP FILED IN BOOK 152, PAGES 35 TO 37 INCLUSIVE OF
PARCEL F1APS, IN 4'HE Oc^FICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
WHLREAS, the City planning Commission did hold a
the ;ivic Center in the City of Anaheim on .7u1 8
of sa_d public hearing at
public h~aring having been duly given ~as 98equired b~ P~m " notice
accordanr_e with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal CoaA. r:,~..~__ .
to hear and consider evidence y iaW and in
investigate and make findir. s ahd~ ~ and agai~st said - `••"r"` 1~,03,
~ ecommendations in connection ther w thand to
and
study madeW b kEAS, saia Commission, after d4e inspection, investigation and
evidence andycepocts offEl a its behalf, and after due consideration
followinq facts: at ~did hearing, does find °f all
and determine the
1• That the petitioner proposes waivers of the following to
constr~ct a 49-lot, 49-unit attached condominium subdivision:
SECTIONS 18.3:.063,p?1 _ p~inimum side ard setback.
AMD 18.31.063.02z (5_ t~l~t required; 5-
proposed) t-- ° 1-----0=feet
~• That rh~ w~;;•,,~_li~r~~cionea waivers
uasis that there are special circumstances a are hereb
size, shape, to Pplicable to the 9ranted on the
identic~lly zonedgr~~'~y~ 1°catien and surcoundings which a~ ~otraperty such as
uf the zonin prOFerty in the same vicinity; and that strictPay to other '
9 Code deprives the property of privileges en'o ed pblicatioa ~
Ptoperties in the identical zone and classificaCion in the vicinity. }
~ Y Y other
3• That there are exceptional or
f
conditi~ns applicable to the extraordinary circumstances or ~
Property that do ~ot appl pLOperty involved or to the intended {
same vicinit y 9enerally to the pro ert or use of the ~
Y and zone. p Y class of use in the
r
4• That the requested ~
and enjoyment of a sUbstantial variance is necessar~ ~
the same vicinit Property right ! for the preservation ~
y and zone, and denied to the possessed by other property yn '
property in question. ~
057Sr
PC85-172
~
1~-::.~:-_-_.
. . .. ___ _... .~....
'1'~ik'K~tiR5i~E71i;'r '~'~''~" - : -
w
5. That the re5oested varianr_e will nat be mate[ially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to tl~e L~roperty or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public heacing in
oppositian; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT i~INDING: Environmental Impact Report No. 235
was previously certified in conjunction witt~ appr.oval of the undetlying
tentarive tcact map by the Ciky Council on March 9, 1980.
NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tt~e Anaheim City Plann`_~g
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Variance, upon the following
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject prope:ty in arder to preserve the safety and
gPneral welEare of the Citizens of tbe City of Anaheim:
1. That subject properly shall be developed substantially in accor,dance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim
marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 11.
Z. That prioc to final building and xoning inspections, Condition No.
1, above-mentioned, shall be cumplied with.
Bt IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
aocs hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resulution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliar.~e with each and all of the conditions
l~ereinabove set fucth. should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any upprovals hecein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THF, FUREGOING P.ESOLUTION is signed and ap oved by me this July 8,
19Fis. `1:-. ~
/,i~ ,~~
/~ i'.'`~~ ~ ~GL/~
CHAIRMAN, ANANEI.4 CITY PLANNING C01!MISSION
ATTEST:
~ 4~~
SECRETA Y, ANAHEIFI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
'z' PC85-172
STATE OF CALIF'ORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY UF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary oi the Anahefm City Planning
C~Tmission, do hereby cactify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on July 8,
1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIUNERS: BOUAS, BUSHORE~ FRY, HEFBST, KING, LA CLAIRE~
MC BUR~'EY
NOES: CUDIMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COI4MISS=UNERS: NONE
ZD1 WITIvESS WHEREOE, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of
July, 1985.
/ill~-~c.r ~ iWGwl.e~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CIiY PLANNING COMMZ~SION
-3- PC85-172