PC 85-185RESOLUTION N0. PC85-185
A RESOLOTION GF THE ANAHEIM CITY YL~INNTNG COMMISSiGN
THAT PETITION POR RECLASSIFICATiON NO. 84-85-42 BE GRANTED
4~HEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Com~iission did receive a verified
petition foc Reclassificat:on from JOHN J. STEVENS AND FATiMA STEVF.NS, 17340
East Temple Avenue, La Puente, CaliEornia 91794, owners of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Califocnia, described as follo~.is:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OE THE NORm~?WEST QUARTER OF SECTLON 26,
TOWNSHiP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WES~~ IN THE RANCHO LAS BOLSAS~ AS
SHOWN ON A DIAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANECUS
MAPS~ IN THE OFFiCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAiD COUN'.CY~
DESCRIBED A5 FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF Tf1E CENTERLiNE OF KATELLA
AVENUE WITH THE NORTHERLY PROLONGATION UF THE EASTL•'RLY LINE
OF LOT 49, TRACT N0. 3240, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED iN BOOK
113~ PAGES i, 2 AND 3 OF PIISCELLANEOUS MAPS iN THE OFFTCE GF
THE COUNTY RECURDER OC• SAID ORANGE COUNTY, CALLFORNIA; TH°NCE
ALONG SAID NORTHGRLY PROLONGATION AND SAID EASTSRLY LZNE~
BEING ALSO THE BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID TF.ACT NO. 324G~ SOUTH 0°
56' 24" EAST, 186.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT
49; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY LINE OF TRACT N0.
3240, NORTH 89° 13' 30" EAST, 89.02 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE
OF THE EASTERLY 211.00 FEET OF SAiD NORTH HALF OF THE WEST
HALF UF THE NORTHEAST ~iUARTER CF THE NOI2THWEST QUARTER OF
SECTiON 28, TOWNSHLP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RAtdCHO I~AS
60LSAS; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LLNE, NORTH 0° 55' 30"
WGST, 186.00 FEET TO SAID CENTERLiNE OF KATELLA AVENUE;
THk;NCE ALONG SAiD CENTF.RLINE~ SOUTH 8.9° 13' 30" WEST, 89.07
FEET TU THE POINT OP E3EGINNI:IG.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Cent~~ in the City of Anah?im on August 5, 1985 at 1:30 p.m.,
noLice of said public heaciny havin7 Leen duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provi=io~~s of the Anaheim btunicip~l Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and considec evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to i~~vestigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
thetewith; dnd
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study mada by il:self and in its behalf, and after due consideratio~ of all
evidence and reports otfeced at said hearing, does find and determir~e the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassiEication ui Gubject
prcperCy Lrom RS-A-43,000 (Residential, A~cicultu[al) Zone to the Cli
(COmmercial, Limited) or a less intense zone.
2. That the finaheim General Plan designates subjecC property for
general commercia.t land ~ses.
05R8r
PC85-185
,, „ ,
3. That the pr.oposed reclassification of subject property Lo the
CL (Commeccial, Limited) Zone is r.ecessary and/or desirable for the orderly
and propec development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly celate to the zones and theic permitted uses locally e~tablished in
close proximity to subjecl• property and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the cammunity.
5. ThaL- the proposed reclassification of subject property requires
the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Cicculation Element
of the General Plan, due to the anticipated increase in traffic which will be
genetated by the intensification of land use.
6. That one person indicated her presence at said public hearing
in opposition to the proposed waivar of maximum sign size; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL iP1PACT FiNDING: That the Anahezm City Planning
Cummission has reviewed the proposal to ceclassify subject property from the
RS-A-93,OU0 (Residential, Ayricultural) Zone to the CL (COmmercial, Limited)
Zone to permit a spiritual psychic palmist in a residential structure with
waivers of minimum feont setback, maximum structural height, minimum
landscaped setback, requi~ed site screening and maximum sign area on a
rectang;ilatly-shaped parcel of land consistin9 of approximately 11,220 square
feet, having a tcontage of approximately 89 feet on the south side of Katella
Avenue, ~nd Further descri.b~d as 157U west Katella Avenue; and does hereby
appr~~ve the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has considered the
Negative Declara~ion togethec with any comments received duriny the public
review process and further findin9 on the basis of. the inil•ial s~udy and any
commencs receive~ that there is no substantial evider,ce that the project will
have a>ignificant ef.fect on the environment.
NOW, THEHGN'ORt, B~ tT kESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Cornmission doec heceby yrant subject Petition Eor Reclassification and, by so
doing, that 7'itle LB-ZOning of the Ananeim Municipal Code be amended to
AY~lude r_he ahove-described property °rcm the RS-A-43,000 (Residential,
Agcicultutal) Zone and Co incorpo~ate said desctibed property into the CL
(COmmercial, Limite~) 'Lone upon the folloa~ing conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary ~rcrequi~ite to the pcoposed use of subject property
in order to presecve che safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the
Ci:y oE Anahetm:
1. That the owner ~f subjecl property shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 60 feet in width
fcom the centerline of the ~treet along Katella Avenue fur street
~iideniny pucposes.
Thac a casl~ paynent in an amount satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shal). be posted with the City for the telocation of the existing
street improvements to the ultimate location.
_z_ PC85-185
3. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
pruperty, Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights 9ranted by this resolution
shail become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date of this resoiution, or such further time as the P.lanning
Commi~sion may grant.
IiE iT PURTHER kESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning C~mmission
does hereay find and determine that adootion of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any oart thereof, b~
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTiOtd is signed and approved by me this 5th day
of August, 1985.
~
~~G'~-c~L~...~ t _ C~ ~' ~ ~ ~
CHAIRWObtAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COPIMISSiON
ATTEST:
/J ~~i' L~ / ~ f~~ ~.L1~c 2c~
~ ~~ Z~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMiSSiON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY UF ORANGE ) gg,
CITY OF ANAHEIb1 )
i, edith L. Hacris, ;ecretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of t_he Anaheim City Planning Commission held on August 5,
1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMZSSLONERS: BUUAS, FRY, HERBST~ LA CLAIRE, LAWICKI, MC BURNEY
NUES: COMMiSSLONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSION$RS: MESSE
IN WITNESS WHEREOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th day of
August, 1985.
- "~~~-~ ~
i~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CiTY PLANNING COMMISSION
'3- PC85-185
'~'~f l