PC 85-219RESOLUTION NO. PC85-219
A RESOLUTIO'd OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNZNG COMMISSIOh
ThAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIEICATION N0. 85-86-6 6E GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commi~sion did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from ELAINE L. BURTCH, 3000 Grover, Buise, idaho
83705, owner, and HUGU A. VAZQUEZ, 619 South Live Oak Drive, Anaheim,
California 92805, agent for ccrtain real property sit~ated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Urange, State of Califor.nia, described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF LOi 27 OF ANAHEIh1 EXTENSION, AS SHOWN UPON .1
MAP OF SURVEY F1AllE BY WILLIAM HAMEL IN 1868 AND FILED IN THE
OFFICE OF THE COUI3TY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY~
CALIFORNIA~ DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
EEGINNING AT POINT IN TlIE CEN'PER LINE OF VF.RMONT AVENUE~
DISTANT THEREOF 462.09 FEET NORTHEASTERLY FROM ITS INTERSECTION
WITH THE CENTER LINE OF PALM STREET AND RUNNZNG THENCE
NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CENTER LIt]E OF VERMONT AVENUE, 75
FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF
THE YARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 7725 IN
THE OFFICE OF THB REGISTRAR OF LAND TITLE OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA AND THE E%TENSION OF SAID LICIE, 257 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHWESTEkLY PARALLEL WITH THE CENTER LINE OF VERMOhT AVENUE,
75 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE F.ABTERLY LINE
OF THE PARCEL OP LAND DESCRIBE~ IN SAID CERTIFICA':E OF TITLE
N0. ',725 AND THE tiXTENSION OF SA'D LINE 257 FEET TO THE POINT
OF' BEGINNINC.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 30, 1985 at 7.:30 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing ha~•~.ng beeci duly given as required by law and in
accordance with tl~e provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said pzoposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findinqs and recommendations in connectio~
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, af ter dur. inspection, investigation and
s;.udy made by itself and in its behalf, anc'. after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner oroposes reclas~ification of subject
property from RS-A-43,000 (Residential, AgricelL•ural) 2one to RM-1200
(Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
medium density residential land use.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property to the
RM-1200 Zone is necessary and/oc desirable for the orderly and proper
development of the community.
D624z PC85-219
a• That the pruposed reclassification of subject property to the
RM-1200 7.cne does properl.y relate to the zones and their permitted uses
locally established in cl~se proximity to subject property and to the zones
and their permitted uses generally establisned throughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property to the
RP1-1200 Zone requires the improvement of abutting streets in accordance with
t}~e Circulation Element of the Ceneral P2an, d~e to the anticipated increase
in traffic which will be generated by the intensification of land u:e.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
EPJVIRONI•lENTAI. IMPACT FINDING: ~Phat the Anaheim City Planning
Co~mission has r.eviewed the proposal to reclassify subject property from the
RS-A-43,OU0 (Residential, Ayricultural) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Fami.ly) Zone or :~ less intense zone to construct a 15-unit
"aEfordable" apartment com~lex wilh waivers of minimum building site area and
maximum structural height on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land cor.sisl•ing
of approXimately 0.3& acre having a Erontage of a
south side of vermont Avenue, and further describedl as e32075W sttVermont
Avenue; and does heceby appro•~e the Ne gative D e c l ara tion upon finding that it
h a s consi dered the Negative Ueclaration together with an~• comments received
during the public ceview process and further finding on the basis of the
initial study and any comments received that there is r.o ~ub~tanlia.l evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, ~HEREFOP.E, B~ IT RESOLVED that the An~.heim City Planning
Commission does tiereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anah~im Ftunicipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described prop~rty from tne RS-A-43,000 (Residential,
Agricultural) Zone and to incorporate said described property into the RM-1200
(Residential, p]ultiple-Family) Zone upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary precequis~te to the proposed use of subject
property in order to preserve the satety and general welfar~ oF t,y~ ~itizeua
of the Citv ~p nr,ti~.~.
1. Thak street lighting facilities along Vermont Avenue shall be
installed as requir.ed by the Utilities General Man~ger in accordance
with specification~ on file in che Office of Utilities Genecal
Manager, and that securiky in the form of a bond, certificate of
deposit, letter of credit, or cash, in an amount and form
satisfactory tu the City of Anaheim, shall be posted with the City
to guarantee the satisfactory cowpletion of the above-mentioned
impcovements. Said security shall be posted with the City of
Anaheim prior to the intcoduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
property. The above-required improvements shall be insta.lled prior
to occupancy.
2. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
a Eee for tree planting purposes along Vermont Avenue in an amount
as detennined by the City Council.
-2-
YC85-219
~,
3• That prior to the introduction of an ozdinance rezoning subject
property, Condition Nos, 1 and 2, aoove-mentioned, shall be
completed. The provisions or rights grantec~ by this resolution
st~all become null and void by action of the Planning Commission
unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the
date of this resolution, oc cuch Eurther time as the Planning
Commission may grant.
aE IT PURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any sur.h condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid oL unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
comp~tent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be dee,ned null and void.
THt FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 30th day
of September, 1985,
" ~ ~,
- ~` l q,! f' • - /'1 ~i_~'/~ ~~ ~
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEI[4 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
,~i .( 9'~ ~ ~'A~i ~
~R~
SbCRETARY, ANAHEIbi CITY YLANNING COPt19ZSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF pRANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHE:t~! )
I, Edi.th L. Harris, Secretary of the Anahei.,. City Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the focegoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commissicn held on September
30, 1985, by the following vote oL the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ FRY~ HERBST, LA CLAIRE~ LAWICiCI, MC BURNEY~
MESSL•'
NOES: C!~MMISSIONERS; NONE
ABSENT: COPIP;ISSIUP7ERS: NONE
IPJ WITNESS WHEREOF, I have he[eunto set my hand this 30th day of
September, 1985.
~Lc~-/ ~ ~~u.~,
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C019MISSION
-3-
PC85-219