Loading...
PC 85-225~ RESOLUTION N0. PC85-225 A RESULUTION OF THE ANAHEIM C:ITY PLANNING COMMISSIOPI THAT PETITIOtJ rOR CONDITIONAL USE PER6IIT N0. 2728 BE GRANTED WFIEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a vecified Petition for Conditional Use Permit from E. I. I, REALTY CORPORATION, p, p, Box 210U, Chino, California 917U8, ATTN: WM. MICHAEL HILL, owner, and KAEMPCER/!/OLFF ZNVESTMENT BUILDERS, ZNC „ 600 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite :400, Los Angeles, California 90017, ATTN: TFiOMAS C. WOLFF, JR., and HOWARD F. TY.OMYSUtJ & ASSOCIATES, 16520 Aston Street, Irvine, California 92714, ATTN: FIOWARll F. THUFIPSON, agent ~or certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: PAI2CEL A: PAFtCELS 1, 3 AND 5, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 140, PAGES 49 AND 50 OF PARCEL PIAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF URANGE COUN1'Y, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTZNG ALL OIL, GAS, MINERALS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES~ LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF SOU PEET FROM THF. SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT WI7'uqUT THE RIGHT OF ENTRY UPGN ANY PORTION OF THE SURFACE ABOVE A DEPTH OF S00 FEET TO TAKE~ MARKET, MINF~ EXPLORE OR DRILL FOR SADlE, AS RESERVED IN DEED FROM A S W KRAEMER, INC., RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1970 IN BOOF 9225~ PAGE 680 UF OFFICIAL R~COP.DS AND IN DEED EXEC:UTED BY WALTER W. KRAEMER~ AS HIS SEPARATE PkOPERTY AND ALFRED 0. KRAEMER, A SINGLE MAN RECURDED MAP.CH 18, 1968 IN BOUK 8545, PAGE 43 OF OFFICZAL RECORDS. PAF2CEL B: AN EAS~PiENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY PURPOSES, OVER, UNDER, ALONG AA1D ?`:~I;O;,'(~,:: iiiii; (iUiti'hEkLY 4U1.U0 FEET OF THE WES^_'ERLY 15.00 FEET QF PARCEL 4 AS SHOi•]td ON A MAP FII~ED IN BOOK 140, PAGES 49 AND 50 OF PARCEL MAI~S, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COU`7TY RECORDL•'R OF URANGE CUUNTY~ CRLIFORNIA. PARCEL C: AIJ EASEMENT YOR INGRESS AND EGRESS PURcOSES OVER THE EASTERLY 20.00 FEE~ UF PAitCEL 2, AS SHC)WN ON A MAP PILED IN BOOK 62, PAGE 7 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF TIjE COUNTY RECORGER OF ORANGE COUNTY~ CALIFORNIA. WtiEREAS, the City Planni;ig Comr~iission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in tne City of Anaheim on October 14, 1985, at 1:30 p,m,, nutice of saiZ public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with khe provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and ayainst said propused conditional use permit and to investigate and make fi.ndings and recommendations in connection therewith; and 0632r PC85-225 ~•~ _ . . ._ WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1• That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.61.050.605 to wit: to ~ermit an industrially-related, two-story oFfice complex in the 61L(SC) (Industcial, Limited, Scenic Co[ridor Overlay) Zone. 2• That the proposed conditional uses are approved for the northerly 2-story building only (labelled as Building 1 on the a~pr!~ved plans) and that the other two buildinas shall be limited to the permitted uses on the Canyon Industrial Area, unless a subsequent corditio~al use permit is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council. 3. ihat the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses ,3nd the gzowth and development- of the acea in which it ?s ~roposed to be located. 4. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full developnient of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safe`.y and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anat~eim. 5• That the granting of the Condi~ional Use Permit undzr the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental. to the peace, health, safety and genecal welface of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. 6. That the traffic generated by tl~e proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways tlesigned and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 7• That no one indicated their pre~ence at said public heariny in opposition; and thar ~n ~~.,`~L;~,j,~~j,~` r~~ received 1n o subject pel•ition. pposition to the ENVIRUNt•tENTAL IhiPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit an industrially-related, two-story office complex in the ML(SC) (Industrial, Limited, Scenic Corridor Otierlay) Zoue on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 8,7 acres, having a frontage of approximately 421 feet on the south side of La Palma Avenue, and further described as 5460 East Palma Avenue (fo[merly Executive Motorhomes); and does here~y app:ove the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that tiiere is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. P10W, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petil-ion for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following r.onditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve tF.e ~afety and yeneral welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: -2- r PC85-225 ~ 1• That prior to issuance cf a building permit, thF appropriate traffic signal assessment fee anall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council for new industrial buildings (BUildings 2 and 3, 1-story each) and Eor new commercial buildings (BUilding 1, 2-stories). 2. That orior to icsuance oE a building permit, the ownet of subject property shall pay the appropriate drainage assessment fees to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Engineer. 3. That the driveway shall be reconstructed to accommodate ten (10) foot radius curb retucn~ as required by the City Traffic Enyineer. 4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 5. That a mediari island shall be installed on La Palma AvenUe to the satisfaction of the C~ty Traffic EnginEer. 6. That prior to commencement of strucEUral framing, fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Ct.ief of the Fire Department. 7. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance and Sanitution Division. 8. That the proposal sha;l comply with aA1 signing requirements of the M~ Zone, unl~ss a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the Planning Conu~ission ur City Council. y. ihat subject pcoperty shall be served by underground utilities. 10. That all air conditioning facilities and ~ther roof and ground mounted equioment ~ha17 he r~pi~~-.1 ~t,;elu~~ crom view. 11. That the proposed office uses for Building No. 1(2-stories) shall be limited to the followiny listed uses and that a covenant reviewed and approved by the City Attorney's Office so limiting said uses shall be recorded in the Office oE th? Orange County Recorder, a copy of which st~all be presented to khe Plauuing Department: 1. Accounting - Bookkeeping, CPA Firms or Temporary CPA Firms Z. Advertising 3. Apptaisers 4• Banks 5. Brckers - Real Estate, Business Opportunities, Etc. b• Business System Companies 7. Communication Cons~ltant 8. Credit Reporting Agency 9. Designer - Industcial, Interior, Craphic 10. Development Companies 11. Insurance Companies/pgencies -3 PC85-225 :;: ,~ 12. Inventory Services 13. Leasing Companies 14• Management Consultants/~ompanies 15. Marketing Reseacch 16. Personnel Agency 17. Sales Office (outside, as it rFlates to the Industrial) 1&• Secretarial Services ly- Any use permit under 'LOning Code Section 1f3.61.U20, subject to all conditions of said Section. Each individual use shali require the approval of the ?lanning Departnent prioz to occupancy which approval shall only be given when it is demonstrated by the applicant ti~at such use is either an expressly permitted use in such zone or meets the c;:iteria of Section 18•61.D50.605 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 12. That subject proper=y shall be developed substantially in accordance a~ith plans and specificctions on file with the City oF Anaheim marked ~xhibit t~os. 1 through 8, 13. ;hat prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one year Erom the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition No,. 1, 2 and 11, above-nientioned, shall be complied wir.~, Extensions for further cime to complete said conditions may be 9ranted iu accordance with Section 1&.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 14. That prior to final building and zoning inspeckions, Condicion ~7os. 3' 4' S~ ~• y. 1~ and 12, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. B~ IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the r~nahe.im City Planninq Commission does hereby fincl and determine that adoption of this Recolution is expressly predicated uF~on applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditi~nc declared invaZg~ ~r ;;r,c~~lucceable Gy the final ~^~ `r' r'~ct Li~eceot, be competent jurisdiction, then this Resolurion and 9 a~nt of any court of contained, shall be deemed null and void, ' Y aPProvals herein THE FOREGOZNG RF.SOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 14th day of October, 1985. i ~''~',~. _/~ E-~.~ C'-~~c u`~ ATTEST: CHAIRWOFIAN~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~~ ~ A/~~~L SECRE'"A Y, ANAfi~,IM CITY PLANYING CUMMISSION ;A -4- PC85-225 ~ ~ STATE OF CALTFOkNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHF.IM ) I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary ~f the Anaheim City Planning Commis5ion, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed anc7 adopred at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 14, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COA1t4ISSI0NERS: ERY~ LA CLP.IRE~ LAWICXI~ MESSE NOES: CO6IMISSIUNE;P.S: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIUNERS: BOUAS, HERBST, MC BURNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, i have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of October, 1985. „ SECRETARY, ANAHEIt9 CITY'PLANNING COMMISSION Y -5- PC85-225 ~~~ :Y-