PC 85-229RESULUTIO[J N0. PC85-229
A RESOLUTION pF THE ANAHEZM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PE'PITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION tl0. 85-86-12 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
~etition fo[ Reclassification from MAGNOLIA PLAZA, 1010 East Chapman Avenue,
Santa Ana, Califo[nia 92701, ATTt~: FRED E. HARTMAN, JR., owner of certain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
Califo[nia, desctibed as follows:
PARCtiL 1:
THE NUR'tHERLY 366 FE£T OF TyE WESTERLY 666 FEET OF THE
NORTHWEST ~UARTER SECTION 7~ TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH~ RANGE 10 WEST~
IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIt~1~ COUI7TY OF
ORP.NGE, STATE Og CALIFORNIA~ AS YER MAP RECOP.UED IN BOOR 51
PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ IN iHE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPi THEREFROM THE IdORTHER:,Y 200 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 200
PEET AND THE SOUTFiERLY 166 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 214 FEET.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Octobec 28, 1985 at 1:30 p.m.,
nocice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim I9unicipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to heac ~nd consider evidence for and against said propased ceclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due considecation o£ all
evidence and ceports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject property
feom CL (COmmercial, Limited) Zone to the Rm-1200 (Res:dential,
Multiple-Family) 'Lone.
2.That the Anaheim General Plan designates subjcct property for
mediwn density residential land ~~ses.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessacy and/oc desirable for the orderly and pro~er development of the
community.
4. That the proposed ceclassification of subject property does
pcoperly relate to the zones and their permitted uces locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their oermitted uses
generally established througha~at the community.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public heacing in
opposition; and that no correspondence wa~ received in upposition to subject
petition.
0635r PC65-229
..
,-•
ENVIRONMENTAL IF]PACT FINllING: That thr Anaheim City Planning
Commis~ion has reviewed the proposal tn reclass::.~:y ~~.t,ject property from the
CL (COmmercial, Lim.'.ted) Zone to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Fa:nily) or
a less intense zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 3.29 ,~cres, having a frontage of approximately 46G feet on the
south side of La Palma Avenue, approximately 200 f~aet east of the centerline
of Magnolia Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative ~eclaration upon
finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public review proc_ss and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comment:; received that there is nc
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect en the
environment.
~~oW, THEREFORE, SE ZT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission doe. hereby grant subject Yetition for Reclassification and, by so
doina, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim 6funicipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described property from the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone
and to incorporate said described property into the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found L•o
be a nece~sary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order
to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate ttaffic
signal assessment fee sball be paid ~o the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council for each new dwelling unit.
3. That the driveway shall be consrructed to accommodate ten (10) foot
radius curb returns as reguiced by the City Traffic Engineer.
4. That ~9rainage of sub~ect property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfacto*y to the City Engineer.
5. That s.:bjecL ~.ruN~cLy siiail be served by underground utilities.
6. That prior to commencement of structural freming, Lire hydrants shall
be instal.led and charged as required and determined to be necessary
by the Chief of the Fire Department.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in
accordance with approved plans on file with the Street Maintenance
and S~nitation Division.
8. That all proposed tandem parking spaces shall be assigned tc the same
dwelling unit.
9. That gates shall not be installed across any driveway in a manner
which may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public
street. installation of any gates within a distance of f~rl•y (40)
feet Ecom said public street right(s)-of-way shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer.
-'-
~ PCBS-229
~ .. _.
- ~~. _ _,
10. That all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground
mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and L•he sound
buEfered Lcom adjacent cesidential properties.
11. That prior t•o issuance of building permits, the applicant shall
present evidence satisfactory to L•he Chief Building Inspector that
the proposed project is in conformance with Council Policy Number 542
"Sound Attenuation in Residential Projects" and with Noise Insulation
Standards specified in the California Administrative Code, Title 7.5.
12. That prior to issuance o£ a building permil-, or within a period of
one year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nos. 1, 2 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be
~ granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Dlunicipal
F Code. i
~~
;; 13. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
3, 4, 5, 7, 9 and 10, above-mentioned, shall be complied .rith.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tP~at th~ Anaheim City Planning Commission does
: hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
' predicated upon applicant's compliance with eacb and all ~f the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should ~ny such condition, or any part thereof, be
declaced invalid oc unenforceable by the final judgnent of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOZNG RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 28th day
of October, 1985.
~~ 1'~ -c- %r~.^ ~~4~ \
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMt9ZSSI0N
ATTEST:
/!~i ~ -~-ilil..4i
'~ SF,CRETF~RY, ANA}(grr~ ~?my pLA::t:ItlC C0:•IRiiSSI02~
y:
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
S: COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
'' CITY C~F ANAHEIM )
~'
~ I, Edith L, iIarris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
` Commission, do heceby certify that the faregoing resolution was passed and
~ adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October
28, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
" AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS~ FRY~ HERBST~ LA CLAIRE~ LAWICKI~
a MC DURNEY~ MESSE
NOES: COFIMISSIONEI2S: NONE
a ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
~
{
IN WITNESS WHL•'REOF, I Have hereunto set my hand thia 28th day of
October, ~985.
i ~' .O~GG, iC ~ .~.,
', SECRETARY~ ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ -3- PC85-229
~ ;:,~:._, ., . _
. . _ . . _ _. _.. .
- _ _ _ ... .:~