PC 85-231l~
RESULU7'ION N0. PC85-231
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIDt CITY PLANNING CO[9MISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 2725 Bu GRA.NTED~ IN PART
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from RAJNI B. PATEL, ET. AL., 1600 South Harbor
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92802, owner of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim, County of Ocange, State of California, described as
follows:
PARCEL 1:
^tHE &OUTHERLY 119.96 FEET OF THE NORTHERLY 459.96 FEET OF THE
NORTHEASi QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE $OUTHWEST
QUARiER OF SECTIUN 27, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE
RANCHO LAS BOLSAS~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51~ PAGE
10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGL•' COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
EXCEPTING TFIEREFROM THE WESiERLY 330.00 FEET,
PARCEL 2;
THAT PURTION OF THE NORTHEAS:' QUARTER OF THE SOUTHkEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 27, POWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHOS
SAN JUAN CASON DE SANTA ANA AND LAS 80LSAS, AS SHOWN ON A~1pp
RECORDEll IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF PIISCELLANEOUS P1APS, RECORDS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCFIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTZON OF THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 3267~
AS SHOWN ON A MAP TtIEREOF, RECORDED IN BOOK 102, PAGES 41 AND
42. MISCELLAi9EUUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, WITH A
LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL WITH AND 340 FEET SOUTY., MEASURED AT
RIGHT ANGLES FROM TIiE CENTERLINE OF ORANGE4100D AVENUE, AS SAID
CENTER:.INE IS SHOWN ON SAID FIAP; THF.NCF. F.I:em~p~l gyGNG SAill
='~u~i~Li,Li LiNt: 1'U THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE WHICH IS PARALLEL
WIT[i AND 20 .FEET EAST~ MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM TFIE EAST
LINE OF SAID TRAC2 3267; iHENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE LAST
MENTIOPtED PARALLEL LINE 119.97 FEET TO THE NORTH LZNE OF THE
SOUTH 2U0 FEET 0[' THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF TH~ NORTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWESR' QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 4
SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST~ AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF~ RECORDED IN
BOOK 51, PAGE 10, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE 20 FEET TO THE EAST
LINE OF SAID TRACT 3267; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE TO
TH~ POINT OF BEGINN2NG.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the Cit~• of Anaheim on October 28, 1985 at 1:30 p,m,~
notice of said puSlic hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim hlunicipal Code. Cnapter 18.03,
to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and cecommendations in connection
therewith; and
0637r
PC85-231
l;ci~r~~,~.,;.k:..,,... ......,, ., ...~......,.~..
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investiaation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said heacing, do~s Eind and determine the
foll.owing facts:
~• That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18,4d.050.160 to wit:
to construct a 3-story, 51-unit motel in addition to an existing commercial
building with waiver of:
SECTZUtdS 18.06.040.0231, - blir.imum number and t e of arkin s aces.
1a.06.050.022 (63 spaces required with a maximum 258 small
J.8.06.050.0241, car spaces permitted; 48 snaces with 408
18.06.080 AND cmall car spaces
18.44._ p6_ 6,050 - Proposed)
Z• Thal- the requested waiver is hereby granted, in part, permitting
a minimum of 47 parking spaces to be provided on-site, but requiring that no
more than 258 of those spaces be designated for small cars, as permitted by
code, on the basis that the parking waivec will not cause an increase in
traffic congestion in the immediate viciniry nor adversely affect any
adjoining land uses and granting of the parking waiver under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and fucther subject to
the condition that a covenant sha11 be recorded specifyir.g that subject
Farking variance shall terminate and become null and void upon any change of
use from the existing retail wig shop and also subject to the condition that
revised plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Traffic Engineer
indicating a maximum of 258 small car parking space.^,.
3. That the prooosed use is herebf granted to permit a 51-unit motel
and a retail aiig shop, subject to revised plans bein9 approved by the Planning
De,partment, (a) eliminating any outside access to any bedrooms in either the
manager or owner's unit and (b) showing a minimum of 47 parking spaces with a
maximum of 258 (12) being designated for small cars.
a• ~`~~= ~::~ ~c~~u~eo use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the yrowth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located.
5. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not
detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the granti.ng of the Conditional Use Permit under the
conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare of the Citizens oE the City of Anaheim.
7. That the traffic generated hy the proposed use will not impose an
undue bucden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic ia the area.
8. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition to tha
subject petition.
-2-
PC85-231
BNVIRONMEtJTAL It4PACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning
Cotnmission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify the northerly 51 feet o£
subject property fcom the ks-A-43,000 (Residenkial, Agricultural) Zone to the
CL (Co~meccial, Limited) Zone to construct a 3-story, 51-~nit motel in
addition to an existiny commeecial building with waivec af minimum number and
type of parking spaces on a[ectanyularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 0.80 acre having a frontage of approximately 120 feet on the
west side of Harbor Boulevard, and further described as 2125 South Harbor
Roulevard; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that
it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received
during the publir, review process and further Einding on the basis of the
initial study and any comments ~eceived that there is no substantial evidence
that the project will have a significant effect on the envicontnent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby g[ant subject Petition f.oc Conditional Use Permit, upon
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre[equisite
to the proposed use of the subject property in ordec to preserve the safety
and yeneral welfare of the Citizens of the City ot Anaheim:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permiC, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as determined by the City Council foc new commercial buildings.
,.. That the driveway shall be constcucted to accommodate ten (10) foot
radius cuctr returns as required by the City Traffic Engineer.
3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manne[
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
4. That in tt~e event subject property is to be divided for the purpose
of sale, lease, ar financing, a parcel map to record the approved
division of subject p~operty shall be submitted to and approved by
the City of Anaheim and then be ~ecorded in the Office of the Orange
Co~~nty Recocdec.
5. That subject pr~perty shall be served by unde~gcound utilities.
6. That prioc to commencement of st~uctural framing, fire hydrants shall
be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessaey
by the Chief of the Fice Depattment.
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in
accordance wlth approved plans on file with the Stceet Maintenance
and Sanitation Division.
8. That the owner of subject prope~ty shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee for street ]ighting along Harboc Boulevard in an amount as
determined by the City Cour.cil.
9. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim a
fee for tree planting purposes along Harbor Boulevard in an amount as
determined by ttie CiL•y Council.
_3_ PC85-231
. . .. ......, ~
10. That a covenar.t shall be recorded against the property, i~ a form
satisfactory to the City Attorney, indicating that subject parking
variance shall terminate and become null and void upon any change of
use in the existing retail wig sh~p unlese additional parking is
provided, in accordance with Chap.ar 28.06 "Vehicle Parking and
Loading Requirements".
11. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the adoption
of th~ Zoning Ordinance in connection with Reclassificatior: No.
85-86-1U, now pending.
12. Ynat all air conditioning facili.ties and othec roof and ground
mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view, and the sound
buffered from adjacent resid~ntial pcoperties.
13. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the
CL Zone, unless a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the
Planning Commission or City Council.
14. That a six (6) foot high masonry block wall shall be constructed and
permanently maintained along the westerly property line.
15. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked
~xhibit Nos. 1 through 9; provided, howeve:, that outside access to
bedrooms in the man~ger and owner's units shall be eliminated and
that a minimum of 47 parking spaces shall be prorided with a maximum
of 258 (12) being designated for small cars.
1G. That pzior to issuar,ce of a building permit, or within a period oL
one year from the date of this cesolution, whichever occurs first,
Condition Nos. 1, 8, 9, 10 and 11, above-mentioned, shall be complied
with. Extensions Eor furthec time to complete said conditions may be
g~anted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim ~funicipal
Code.
17. That pcior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos.
2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, and 15, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
BE Ii' EURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
heteinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or ur.enforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any aoprovals herein
contained, shall be ~eemed null and void.
iHE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 28th day
of October, 1985. ~ ^
~ G~ cw~. ~ Q C_. ~ C~c-[-G/
CHAIRWOPIAN, ANAHEIPI C:ITY PLANNIP'G COMMISSION
ATTESi•
~~~ ~ ~
SECRETA~tY~ ANAHEIPI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC85-231
I~fWYA'.W~n,«iu~ ..-.,..~.. . .~ .......... ...... ... . ... . . .. . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .
_ __....._~..;.,,:.
STAiE OF CALIFURNIA )
COUNTY OF URANGE ) ss.
CTTY OF ANAHE?M )
I, Editf: L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do hereby ~ertify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of Lhe Anaheirr, City Planning Commission held on October
28, 19&5, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMb1ISSI0NERS: BOUAS, FRY, HERBST~ LA CLAIP.E, LAWICKI~ FIESSE
NUES: COt•1MISSIONER~: NONE
ABSENT: COMMLSSIONEP.3; MC BURNEY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of
: Uctober, 1985,
i~
_ ~ ~. ~ .~ ,~/ ..~, , ~
SECRETARY~ AhAHEIM (,ITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5-
PC85-231