PC 85-258,.~,,.
REuULUTION NU. PCdS-258
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CZTY YLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATZON N0. 85-86-8 SE GRANTEU
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planninq Commission did receive a ve~ified petition
fos Reclassification fcom I,ARRY ALVZN TORGERSON AND DINAH LYNNE TORGERSON, 216
Nocth Claudina Street, Anaheim, California 92805, owners, and CITY OF ANAHEIM,
200 South Anaheim, California 92805, ATTN: NORMAN J. PRIEST, EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING, agent for cectain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of orange, State of California,
described as follows:
THOSE CERTAIN PARCELS OP LAND SITUATED ZN THE CITY OE ANAHEIM~
COUNTY OF OI'iANGE~ STATE GF CALIFORNIA MORE PARTICULAIiLY
DESCRIBED A:~ Lv~S 7, 8. 9 and 10 OF THE SL':+HISE TRACT, AS PER
MAP RECORDEll IN BOOR 3, PAGE 38~ MISCELLANEOUS MAPS~ RECORDS OF
SAID ORANGE COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on Octobec 14, 1985 at 1:30 p.m.,
notice of said public nearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of the Ananeim t4unicipal Code. Chapter 18.03,
to hear and considec evidence for and a5ainst said proposed reclassification
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; said public hearing haviny been continued to the Planr~ing
Commission meeting of December 9, 1985; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideratioa of all
evidence and reports offeced at ~aid liearing, does find and deter~ine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes ceclassification of subject property
from the CG (Commeccial, General) to the RM-1200 (Re~idential,
Multiple-Family) Zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject pcoperties for
medium density residential land uses.
3. That the pcoposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/o~ desirable for the o[derly and pcoper development of the
community.
4. That the neoposed teclassification of subject pcoperty does
ptoperly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in
close oroximity to subject propecty and to the zones and their permitted uses
generally established ~hroughout the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subaect pcoperty requires
the dedication of abutting alleys in accozdance with the Circulation Element
of the General Plan, due to the ant;..~pated inccease in t[affic which will be
genetated by the intensification of land u~e.
PC85-256
Oo65r
`_ z^'sr
;,
~4~ ~ '. ' ~ .:~ ~ .. ~...~ .y{+.w~+~ : ~'..~ U.fLG ~,.~i+fY~ Y. ~^
_ _ _ w~a'ua.erumll~tY[!~: ~~?Y~GIA".ZM+b , ~ .. . . . . .. .'°~~}... ~1r _"
,-..
6• That no one indicated theic presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no corcespondence was received in opposition to subject
petition.
ENVIRONMEC7TAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Plan~ing
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify sub;ect ~,r.operty from the
CG (Commercial, General) to the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone on
a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately O.fi3 acre
located at the southeast cozner of Cypress Street and Claudina Street, and
Eurther described as 210, 216, 220 and 226 North Claudina Street; and does
hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that it has consideted
the Neqative Declaration together ~ith ~ny comments received during the public
review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received r_hac there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
CommissionOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESJLVF.D that the Anaheim City Planning
does hereby yrant subj~;; petition for Recla~sification and, by so
doing, that Title 18-ZOning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to
exclude the above-described ~roperty from the CG (Commercial, General) and to
incorporate said described property to the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone upon the folloNing conditions which are heteby found to
be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order
to preserve the safety and geneca] welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim:
1. That the owner of subject prcperty shall irrevocably offec to
dedicate to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 10 feet i~ width from
the centerline of the alley along the alley for alley widening
purposes.
2. That ordinances reclassifying subject property shall be adopted as
each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such
parcel; provided, however, that the word "oercAl• ~r;~~l mean
presently ~•zetir., p,;icei~ uf recocd and
aPProved by the City for a lot split. a~Y Parcel or parcels
3. That prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject
prooerty, Condition No. 1, abo~~e-mentioned, shall be completed. The
Pro~isions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and
compli d withnwithi~eoneayaar9fromm~the~datelof th s es lution are
such further time as the Plsnning Commission ma or
Y grant.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the A~aheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine L•hat adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's c~mpliance with each and all of the conditions
,:.- heceinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or an
declared invalid or unenforceable by the Einal
Y part thereof, be
+;: Competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, ~a gma~t of anY court of
k~p_ i:, ~,+; contained, shall be deemec~ null and void. Y ~PProvals hetain
~ r
Y";!'F., - '
~!'~
~As~:~::
~ ~, .
~ v~ -Z PC85-258
4 ~z;~«
-. ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 9th day of
December, 1985.
~ ~ ,~ -
! .~,_.;,~~c.,~., ~>'~~~ /~f"~¢.~c~:
CHAIRWOMAN, ANAHEIM CITY rLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~ ,!~~i/~ ol ,'~1,~.-w..
' SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CZTY PLANNIPIG COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission, do heceby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on December
9, 1965, by tne following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIOt7ERS: BOUAS, FRY, HERBST, LA CLAIRE, LAWICKI, MC BURNEY
MESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT; COMMISSIONF,RS: NOlIE
ZN WITNESS WHERF,OF, t have he:eunto set my hand this 9th day oE
December, 1985.
,~A T~L. ~~s'L.l.. c ~„
~
SECR6iAR , ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING ON
-3- PC85-258